Article View: rec.guns
Article #8069Re: home protection concerns
From: Gregory O. Harp
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 16:11
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 16:11
44 lines
2725 bytes
2725 bytes
holger@vmars.tuwien.ac.at (Holger Reusch (Dipl. Gerhard + Joe)) writes:
#morlan@afit.af.mil (Bruce W. Morlan) writes:
##I handle my home defense weapon with a slightly oily cloth when I
##preload it in the "readly alert" mode. This cuts down on the oils and
##salts that the gun has to endure during storage - but probably removes
##fingerprints. Is the net.opinion really strong on this issue?
#Since you have a factual reason for wiping your gun the finger-
#print viewpoint is of minor importance. You did it because
#you are a responsible gun owner interested in keeping his guns in
#serviceable condition. BTW, who is interested in fingerprints
#when it is wholly clear from the start who used the gun?
I agree. Besides, you'd be getting fingerprints on it if used in a
home/self defense situation. That is, of course, assuming you don't
go around wearing gloves all the time. ;)
##Also - I use factory loads - partially jacketed hollow points (.357
##Mag), would I be better off if I used a more conventional round (is the
##hollow point a problem?
#If the law doesn't prohibit HPs, I don't think that they would
#pose a problem. HPs are, for instance, less penetrative than
#round-nosed bullets.
On this subject, I still think there's reason to worry. Personally, I
use Black Talon (tm) as my defense ammo. However, if I ever have to
use them I expect that I might have to answer to a lawyer who has
renamed them to "Black Evil Baby-Killing Talons." The simple answer
is: I shopped around and picked the ammo that I felt had the highest
likelihood of protecting the lives of myself and my loved ones while
being as safe as possible WRT bystanders.
If you're using a .357 for home/self defense I'd _definitely_ use some
kind of hollowpoint. Round-nosed ammo tends to _way_ overpenetrate in
that caliber. Also, supposedly a shot that fully penetrates the
target is less likely to stop them than one that comes to rest inside
the body.
--
-----------------Greg-Harp----------------harp@netcom.com------------------
Dallas Cowboys -- NFC Champions
The 'Boys are Back!
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan28.124825.15634@netcom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!math.fu-berlin.de!ira.uka.de!scsing.switch.ch!univ-lyon1.fr!ghost.dsi.unimi.it!rpi!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!agate!ames!haven.umd.edu!mimsy!netcom.comShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!math.fu-berlin.de!ira.uka.de!scsing.switch.ch!univ-lyon1.fr!ghost.dsi.unimi.it!rpi!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!agate!ames!haven.umd.edu!mimsy!netcom.com From: harp@netcom.com (Gregory O. Harp) Newsgroups: rec.guns Subject: Re: home protection concerns Message-ID: <1993Jan28.124825.15634@netcom.com> Date: 28 Jan 93 16:11:08 GMT Sender: magnum@mimsy.umd.edu Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest) Lines: 45 Approved: gun-control@cs.umd.edu