Thread View: rec.heraldry
5 messages
5 total messages
Started by boyko
Wed, 30 Dec 1992 14:54
But Solvieg,
Author: boyko
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 14:54
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 14:54
8 lines
722 bytes
722 bytes
It is my understanding that this group is not just for heraldry within the sca, but for heraldry in general. I would agree with you if it were not my opinion that general questions regarding the role of heraldry within the SCA are best suited for rec.org.sca, in light of the sort of audience that is drawn to rec.org.sca; that newsgroup provides the best "fit" for such questions. Layamon
Re: But Solvieg,
Author: Roadster Racewerks
Date: Fri, 01 Jan 1993 12:07
Date: Fri, 01 Jan 1993 12:07
19 lines
1200 bytes
1200 bytes
It all depends upon what topic of heraldry the SCA is discussing. If it deals entirely with SCA rules of blazon, and the inevitable lawyering that causes, it does not belong here. If it deals with more general topics, such as whether color-on-color was used more frequently than our college of arms currently believes, it is probably useful to ask people outside the SCA for an opinion. It might also be useful to discuss Tadhg's ideal of "south of the Trent, west of the Rhine and north of.... (I forget, somewhere in southern France) and between 1100 and 1400" as the true essence of "pure" heraldic style, here. That might generate some interesting discussion from non-SCA students of history. (And that is about as far into things of interest to the SCA I would want to go in this forum...) Suze
Re: But Solvieg,
Author: Tuomas Viljanen
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 1993 13:06
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 1993 13:06
68 lines
4202 bytes
4202 bytes
In article <C06CCz.997@agora.rain.com> trifid@agora.rain.com (Roadster Racewerks) writes:
>
>
>It all depends upon what topic of heraldry the SCA is discussing. If it deals
>entirely with SCA rules of blazon, and the inevitable lawyering that causes,
>it does not belong here. If it deals with more general topics, such as whether
>color-on-color was used more frequently than our college of arms currently
>believes, it is probably useful to ask people outside the SCA for an opinion.
This newsgroup should not be a SCA-oriented channel, but it should be an
open forum for all kinds of "official" and inofficial heraldry in our world.
>It might also be useful to discuss Tadhg's ideal of "south of the Trent, west
>of the Rhine and north of.... (I forget, somewhere in southern France) and
>between 1100 and 1400" as the true essence of "pure" heraldic style, here.
I have come into contact with the SCA only quite lately (though I have been
interested in the history and heraldry for years). Since most of the SCA
personae seem to be of Celtic origin (and they had no heraldry at all), why
wonder with the heraldic problems at all ?
There are A HELL OF A LOT heraldry in the world apart from the Anglo-French
style, and they are damn well as period as the "official" SCA heraldry. For
example, Tadgh is going to dismiss the whole world of The Holy Roman Empire
and German heraldry, as well as Italian, Polish, Balkan, Iberian and
Nordic heraldry. They are of different style than the Anglo-French heraldry,
often poorer by standards, but they are certainly period and of the style
of the according countrey and cultural sphere. Or is the SCA limited only
for 300-1000 AD Celtic personae who use 1100-1400 AD Anglo-French heraldry ?
Anachronism, certainly. I have a Castilian persona and I have applied him
a Castilian style coat of arms. Yes, I admit that there is one conflict
with the tinctures' law: bordure of color next to another color, but I have
two excuses I am going to use if the apply is repulsed: 1) bordure is a
typical Castilian feature and 2) the tinctures' rule does not generally apply
on bordures or other surmounted ordinaries, even in the Anglo-French heraldry.
A generic Hungarian coat of arms would be:
Azure, a severed Turk's head proper blood dripping Gules impaled with a
sword palewise Argent, on the base a triple mountain Vert
This coat of arms would never make it in the SCA armory, but it still is
in Hungarian style and "good" in the Hungarian standard, though I myself
do not find it particularly impressive (it breaks at least four heraldic
rules). More important, the Hungarian-Turkish wars _are_ period, and there-
fore this "generic" Hungarian coat-of-arms _should_ be qualified. Or how
about the Balkan and/or Polish "housemark" armory ?
>That might generate some interesting discussion from non-SCA students of
>history.
Certainly. What are the blazons of the arms of the newborn Balkan countries ?
The Baltic arms are, I'd think:
Estonia: Or, seme de hearts Or, three leopards Azure
Latvia: Parti per fess; chief Azure, a rising sun Or: base parti per pale
dexter Argent, lion rampant sinister Gules, sinister Gules, a griffin
rampant Argent
Lithuania: Gules, a vytis (riding armored knight on a black horse) proper,
on a shield Azure a double cross Argent
--++ Tuomas Viljanen ++ For a battle like Crecy, you do ++
++ Lahderanta 20 A 19 ++ not need a military genius like ++
++ SF-02720 Espoo FINLAND ++ Edward III. All you need is an ++
++ 358-0-592175 or c34657b@saha.hut.fi ++ idiot like Duke of Alencon. ++
Baltic states (was Re: But Solvieg,)
Author: Tero Juhani Heikkinen
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 1993 14:48
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 1993 14:48
23 lines
1551 bytes
1551 bytes
In article <1993Jan2.130646.4721@nntp.hut.fi> c34657b@saha.hut.fi (Tuomas Viljanen) writes: >Certainly. What are the blazons of the arms of the newborn Balkan countries ? >The Baltic arms are, I'd think: > >Estonia: Or, seme de hearts Or, three leopards Azure That's Or, three lions passant guardant in pale azure. Only Denmark has the hearts. And btw, the term 'leopard' is probably just a French Taunt(tm) and therefore only applicable to the arms of England. >Latvia: Parti per fess; chief Azure, a rising sun Or: base parti per pale > dexter Argent, lion rampant sinister Gules, sinister Gules, a griffin > rampant Argent >Lithuania: Gules, a vytis (riding armored knight on a black horse) proper, > on a shield Azure a double cross Argent tsahib. -- *** Tero.J.Heikkinen@hut.fi *********** Disclaimer wanted: Apply within *** "Well, I'm an accountant, and consequently too boring to be of interest."
Re: But Solvieg,
Author: Francois R. Velde
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1993 16:10
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1993 16:10
15 lines
1350 bytes
1350 bytes
In article <1993Jan2.130646.4721@nntp.hut.fi> c34657b@saha.hut.fi (Tuomas Viljanen) writes: >a Castilian style coat of arms. Yes, I admit that there is one conflict >with the tinctures' law: bordure of color next to another color, but I have >two excuses I am going to use if the apply is repulsed: 1) bordure is a >typical Castilian feature and 2) the tinctures' rule does not generally apply >on bordures or other surmounted ordinaries, even in the Anglo-French heraldry. Witness the Anjou mark of cadence (a bordure gules next to France's azure field). The Touraine cadence is a bordure compony argent and gules. Perfectly legitimate heraldry, from a respectable family. One of the oldest arms in France is Burgundy Ancient: bendy of 6, or and azure, a bordure gules. >What are the blazons of the arms of the newborn Balkan countries ? I had a post on this recently. Should I repost?
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads