Article View: rec.mag
Article #94Re: Unscientific Americans
From: Ed Kaulakis
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 1988 03:04
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 1988 03:04
11 lines
752 bytes
752 bytes
1) Each issue since the takeover has been slimmer than the last... 2) Stupid advertising. 3) Now T&A. I've been reading Sci Am since I was 11 (28 years), and it is probably the source of 80% of what I know outside my field. Its loss would be a catastrophe! SUBSCRIBE! NOW!
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2736@gryphon.CTS.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!agate!ig!uwmcsd1!marque!gryphon!edkShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!agate!ig!uwmcsd1!marque!gryphon!edk From: edk@gryphon.CTS.COM (Ed Kaulakis) Newsgroups: rec.mag,sci.misc,talk.rumors Subject: Re: Unscientific Americans Message-ID: <2736@gryphon.CTS.COM> Date: 29 Feb 88 03:04:40 GMT Organization: Trailing Edge Technology, Redondo Beach, Ca. Lines: 10 Keywords: Scientific American Summary: Taken over by krauts, Sci Am is in deep deep puckey...