Article View: rec.mag
Article #99Re: Unscientific Americans
From: William L. Rupp
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 1988 08:23
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 1988 08:23
17 lines
1331 bytes
1331 bytes
I have no idea how S.A. is doing or will do in the future (though I of course hope the magazine prospers). I do know that in the 1940's, S.A. was a very poor journal, consisting mostly of industry press releases. About 1948, however, there was a rebirth. The quality and quantity of articles improved greatly. I only know of this retrospectively, having just entered the first grade myself in 1948. Perhaps someone with a longer memory could enlighten us with the details. In any event, maybe S.A. is destined to have these cycles of good and bad times. Maybe it is too soon to count this venerable journal out. Bill ====================================================================== I speak for myself, and not on behalf of any other person or organization .........................How's that, Gary? ======================================================================
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1019@cod.NOSC.MIL>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!ucsd!nosc!cod!ruppReferences:
<3555@dayton.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!ucsd!nosc!cod!rupp From: rupp@cod.NOSC.MIL (William L. Rupp) Newsgroups: rec.mag,sci.misc,talk.rumors Subject: Re: Unscientific Americans Message-ID: <1019@cod.NOSC.MIL> Date: 4 Mar 88 08:23:04 GMT References: <3555@dayton.UUCP> Reply-To: rupp@cod.nosc.mil.UUCP (William L. Rupp) Organization: Computer Sciences Corp., San Diego Lines: 16 Keywords: Scientific American