🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: rec.models.rc
Article #1767

MonoKote/SuperMonoKote (was FliteKote<=>MonoKote?)

#1767
From: Rich
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 17:28
28 lines
1648 bytes
In article <swhite.725657520@convex.com>, swhite@convex.com (Steve Whiteside) wrote:
> 
> 2) I haven't seen any SuperMonoKote around. Is this something that
> went the way of the dodo bird? Is MonoKote really SuperMonoKote in
> disguise?
> 

 This reminded me of a question that I have had for a while now.  No one
seems to be able to answer me so far.... and I don't trust the boyz at one
local Hobby shop, they seem to always want to answer me in any way that will
cause me to spend more money at their shop.

  Q) What is the difference between MonoKote and SuperMonoKote?

  I have a few rolls of each, and I can't really tell any difference in them.
Is this just a marketing term?  Maybe they changed the name at one point and
I have some 'old' rolls?  Or is it that some colors are called 'Super' and
others are simply the 'regular' stuff?

 Either way, I still need to know.  How can I get my plane to fly correctly
if I don't use the proper stuff??? ;-) ;-)


-- 
 /**************************************************************************\
 * Rich Bono                     IMRICH         UUCP:rbono@necis.ma.nec.com * 
 * (508) 635-6300                 NM1D          AMPR: nm1d@nm1d.nh.usa.noam * 
 \**************************************************************************/
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1784@necis.UUCP>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!transfer.stratus.com!necis!rbono
References: <swhite.725657520@convex.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!transfer.stratus.com!necis!rbono
From: rbono@necis.UUCP (Rich)
Newsgroups: rec.models.rc
Subject: MonoKote/SuperMonoKote (was FliteKote<=>MonoKote?)
Message-ID: <1784@necis.UUCP>
Date: 30 Dec 92 17:28:57 GMT
References: <swhite.725657520@convex.com>
Organization: still seeking it
Lines: 28