Article View: rec.models.rc
Article #1837Re: Rocket powered R/C (Estes Astro Blaster)
From: Mike Welch
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1993 15:08
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1993 15:08
74 lines
3402 bytes
3402 bytes
In article <42995@sdcc12.ucsd.edu>, dlou@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (Dennis Lou) writes: |> |> |> Anyone have any experience with the Estes Astro Blaster? Yes, I built one scratch from a friend's plans. |> |> I was thinking about getting either this one or the Sig Ninja. |> |> The Astro Blaster sounds really intriguing because it is a canard and |> can fly rocket boost, slope, or you can use a dummy rocket motor and |> plug in a .049. This would work out great for me since I can fly it on |> the slope when I'm at school (Torrey Pines site), fly it under power |> at a schoolyard when I'm home for the holidays, and fly it rocket boost |> when I want to show off to my friends. I built mine without the rocket motor. My firend had a "blast" with his under rocket power. (Sorry for the pun.) |> |> My concerns are that |> 1> I don't know how well it will fly on the slope. For that matter, I don't |> know how well it will fly period. (I already read the Dec `92 MAN review, |> but they never mentioned anything about slope performance or much about glide |> characteristics) I thought I could improve the glide by changing the airfoil to an Epler 374. I was wrong. The canard seemed to be too small. I changed the incidence in order to increase the lift. This resulted in very poor glide. I was generally disappointed in the glide. Even at Torrey Pines. I could keep it up. It would roll nice. but.. |> |> 2> The elevator/aileron canard configuration prevents stall maneuvers (i.e. |> snap rolls and tumbles) |> I could barely do a loop. Too much pitch stability. The fuse was big and boxy. Too much drag to retain energy. |> 3> the .049 pusher configuration means you can't use a clunk tank (the |> clunk will be facing the wrong way) and the QRC/Texaco/Black Widow |> engines won't go inverted which, combined with #2, means you can't do many |> good stunts under power. The glide was alot worse inverted. Too much drag from the canard. I still might add an .049. That should make up for the poor glide. |> |> Anyone have any comments on this plane or how to solve #3? |> |> -- |> Dennis Lou || "But Yossarian, what if everyone thought that way?" |> dlou@ucsd.edu || "Then I'd be crazy to think any other way!" |> [backbone]!ucsd!dlou |+==================================================== |> dlou@ucsd.BITNET |Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak went to my high school. Thanks, Mike ****************************************************************************** Mike Welch * "Gun laws go against Darwin's Theory. SDRC * Let stupid people kill each other." 2000 Eastman Drive * Milford, Ohio 45150 * "Governments should not mandate the Tel: (513) 576-2514 * use of safety belts. Let Natural Email: Mike.Welch@sdrc.com * Selection work." - me ******************************************************************************
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<270@heimdall.sdrc.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!psinntp!heimdall!sgidq4!dqwelchReferences:
<42995@sdcc12.ucsd.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!psinntp!heimdall!sgidq4!dqwelch From: dqwelch@sgidq4.sdrc.com (Mike Welch) Newsgroups: rec.models.rc Subject: Re: Rocket powered R/C (Estes Astro Blaster) Message-ID: <270@heimdall.sdrc.com> Date: 4 Jan 93 15:08:53 GMT References: <42995@sdcc12.ucsd.edu> Sender: news@heimdall.sdrc.com Organization: SDRC Lines: 74