Article View: rec.org.sca
Article #5843Re:Heraldic Questions...
From: pols055
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 22:41
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 22:41
18 lines
1578 bytes
1578 bytes
As I beleif someone has already pointed out, one of the biggest problems with promoting period style heraldry is that most designs that are simple enough to be period conflict with the masses of period heraldry which also follows that simple design. For example anything with a rampant feline as a single charge. Many of us are familiar with the representations of row after row of arms that look almost identical, differenced only by colour of the feline or the field or even something as minor as a splt tail or a crown added to the feline charge (the page I am thinking of is in the Oxford Guide to Heraldry but there are others). Of course I can't register my black panther on a red and white barred field! it conflicts with dozens of others. So my only option is to use unusual charges, field divisions, etc so that it is different enough. Maybe this is justified, maybe not. But it seems to me that we have to either allow greater conflict and promote period designs, or allow periodicity to suffer so as to protect uniqueness in armory. Eleonora van den Bogaerde. Southron Gaard, Caid. Simone Hindin, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan25.114137.1@csc.canterbury.ac.nz>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!ames!decwrl!waikato.ac.nz!canterbury.ac.nz!cantva!pols055Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!ames!decwrl!waikato.ac.nz!canterbury.ac.nz!cantva!pols055 Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re:Heraldic Questions... Message-ID: <1993Jan25.114137.1@csc.canterbury.ac.nz> From: pols055@csc.canterbury.ac.nz Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 22:41:37 GMT Organization: University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand Nntp-Posting-Host: cantva.canterbury.ac.nz Lines: 18