Article View: rec.org.sca
Article #6138Re: Authentic?
From: reichmann
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 12:51
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 12:51
17 lines
1302 bytes
1302 bytes
In re: the constant battle over the definition of authenticity. Please, all of you stop and think about what you are saying! Try and recall the spirit in which the SCA is founded and in which we participate. Authenticity, is a goal, the ATTEMPTS IN GOOD FAITH to be authentic is the reality. Yes, obviously there will be a wide range of attempts, but to qualify them is to rate them and, frankly that is not what we are all about, or so I have been led to believe. When someone asks about authenticity the best response, in my opinion, is to have that person do their best within their own ability and resources. The more they research and work, the more "authentic" it would be, but this does not mean that someone who can't or even won't go through all the trouble should feel penalized. Sorry to lecture, but my feathers got ruffled! -Alyna Thomas (Debbie Reichmann)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan26.175153.2141@guvax.acc.georgetown.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!emory!gatech!darwin.sura.net!guvax.acc.georgetown.edu!reichmannShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!emory!gatech!darwin.sura.net!guvax.acc.georgetown.edu!reichmann From: reichmann@guvax.acc.georgetown.edu Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: Authentic? Message-ID: <1993Jan26.175153.2141@guvax.acc.georgetown.edu> Date: 26 Jan 93 12:51:53 GMT Article-I.D.: guvax.1993Jan26.175153.2141 Distribution: world Organization: Georgetown University Lines: 17