🚀 go-pugleaf

Greetings to all assembled, from Vajk!

Loki has posted the results of his informal survey, and while
I accept that the results are probably not an accurate reflection
of the SCA as a whole, I am intrigued by the series of figures
from the 13th back to the 10th century.

The figures seem to be roughly even from the 10th - 16th centuries
except for the 13th and 11th.

Is this radical departure due to the methodology, or is it
the resutl of bias against those particular centuries?  I would
have expected the 11th century to be considerably higher, with
1066 and all that!

For statistical purposes I believe, from a quick glance, that
this sample would be labeled a LARGE sample, but that is a 
technical definition only.

Vajk