🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: rec.puzzles
Article #2670

Re: Port Holes

#2670
From: David Karr
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 17:11
13 lines
1192 bytes
In article <1993Jan10.122008.1802@wisipc.weizmann.ac.il> jhsegal@wiscon.weizmann.ac.il (Livian) writes:
>Oh,come on! It is a known fact that the round shapes are more resistable to
>pressure.So ship port holes are round to resist to the water pressure.

This is a non sequitur.  A sphere will indeed withstand more pressure
than a cube of the same volume and skin thickness.  But this doesn't
explain why a round hole in that sphere should be stronger than
a square hole.  I believe the stress analysis required for the latter
case is much more sophisticated than for the former.

Further I would guess that the properties of the round porthole often
are important when there is not even any water *near* the porthole, and
atmospheric pressure is equal on both sides of the porthole.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1993Jan12.171156.16696@cs.cornell.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!batcomputer!cornell!karr
References: <13797@grayt> <1993Jan10.122008.1802@wisipc.weizmann.ac.il>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: rec.puzzles
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!batcomputer!cornell!karr
From: karr@cs.cornell.edu (David Karr)
Subject: Re: Port Holes
Message-ID: <1993Jan12.171156.16696@cs.cornell.edu>
Organization: Cornell Univ. CS Dept, Ithaca NY 14853
References: <13797@grayt> <1993Jan10.122008.1802@wisipc.weizmann.ac.il>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 17:11:56 GMT
Lines: 13