Article View: rec.puzzles
Article #2670Re: Port Holes
From: David Karr
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 17:11
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 17:11
13 lines
1192 bytes
1192 bytes
In article <1993Jan10.122008.1802@wisipc.weizmann.ac.il> jhsegal@wiscon.weizmann.ac.il (Livian) writes: >Oh,come on! It is a known fact that the round shapes are more resistable to >pressure.So ship port holes are round to resist to the water pressure. This is a non sequitur. A sphere will indeed withstand more pressure than a cube of the same volume and skin thickness. But this doesn't explain why a round hole in that sphere should be stronger than a square hole. I believe the stress analysis required for the latter case is much more sophisticated than for the former. Further I would guess that the properties of the round porthole often are important when there is not even any water *near* the porthole, and atmospheric pressure is equal on both sides of the porthole.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan12.171156.16696@cs.cornell.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!batcomputer!cornell!karrReferences:
<13797@grayt> <1993Jan10.122008.1802@wisipc.weizmann.ac.il>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: rec.puzzles Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!batcomputer!cornell!karr From: karr@cs.cornell.edu (David Karr) Subject: Re: Port Holes Message-ID: <1993Jan12.171156.16696@cs.cornell.edu> Organization: Cornell Univ. CS Dept, Ithaca NY 14853 References: <13797@grayt> <1993Jan10.122008.1802@wisipc.weizmann.ac.il> Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 17:11:56 GMT Lines: 13