🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Thread View: rec.pyrotechnics
7 messages
7 total messages Started by Mike N. Tue, 20 Apr 1999 00:00
way off topic(Canadian email bill)
#1355
Author: Mike N.
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 00:00
14 lines
1214 bytes
The government is quietly trying to push a bill that will allow them to
charge you an extra $0.05 for every email received. Just think that is
you receive 10 messages a day for a year that would amount to $180 above
your internet costs. You really would be paying for spam. This money
would be paid to Canada post directly as "alternate postage fees" for a
service they do not even provide. The bill is 602p, call your local MP
and say no, or things may change for the worst.
-- 
Talking to yourself is ok, as long as you don't get an answer.

Mike N.

My new pyro site http://www.angelfire.com/co2/kno3/index.html (frames)
under construction
Re: way off topic(Canadian email bill)
#1356
Author: Andy Krywonizka
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 00:00
14 lines
1160 bytes
" Mike N." wrote:
> 
> The government is quietly trying to push a bill that will allow them to
> charge you an extra $0.05 for every email received.

No, they're not. This has already been debunked as a hoax.

Andy K.

-- 
**NEW** E-mail:  gryphon223 <AT> home <DOT> com
ICQ:  5025799 (authorization required)

"Gun control is using both hands"
Re: way off topic(Canadian email bill)
#1357
Author: Timothy Campbell
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 00:00
6 lines
1088 bytes
Mike N. wrote:
> 
> The government is quietly trying to push a bill that will allow them to
> charge you an extra $0.05 for every email received. 
I got this by email. I sent it on to many. I've got a number of
responses saying it is a hoax. The lawyers, and the MP, do not exist.
Re: way off topic(Canadian email bill)
#1358
Author: Mike N.
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 00:00
17 lines
1183 bytes
Timothy Campbell wrote:
> 
> Mike N. wrote:
> >
> > The government is quietly trying to push a bill that will allow them to
> > charge you an extra $0.05 for every email received.
> I got this by email. I sent it on to many. I've got a number of
> responses saying it is a hoax. The lawyers, and the MP, do not exist.

I know now, I let my emotions take over before investigating.
-- 
Talking to yourself is ok, as long as you don't get an answer.

Mike N.

My new pyro site http://www.angelfire.com/co2/kno3/index.html (frames)
under construction
Re: way off topic(Canadian email bill)
#1359
Author: Timothy Campbell
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 00:00
11 lines
1320 bytes
Mike N. wrote:
> Talking to yourself is ok, as long as you don't get an answer.
1) When you talk to God, it's considered prayer. When God talks to you,
some believe its schizophrenia.
2) Talking is OK, answering is alright; we get concerned when you lose
the argument.
-- 
An informed person and open-minded being will accept logical reasoning,
 only a fool would be ofended by it. Unknown

Remember to remove the 'NOSPAM' from the "Reply To" address.
Re: way off topic(Canadian email bill)
#1353
Author: Don
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 00:00
19 lines
1565 bytes
You have been duped.  It was a hoax
Don Smith
Victoria Legal Research Co.

Mike N. <705728@ican.net> wrote in message <371C3369.21970CAC@ican.net>...
>The government is quietly trying to push a bill that will allow them to
>charge you an extra $0.05 for every email received. Just think that is
>you receive 10 messages a day for a year that would amount to $180 above
>your internet costs. You really would be paying for spam. This money
>would be paid to Canada post directly as "alternate postage fees" for a
>service they do not even provide. The bill is 602p, call your local MP
>and say no, or things may change for the worst.
>--
>Talking to yourself is ok, as long as you don't get an answer.
>
>Mike N.
>
>My new pyro site http://www.angelfire.com/co2/kno3/index.html (frames)
>under construction
Re: way off topic(Canadian email bill)
#1354
Author: Mike N.
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 00:00
31 lines
1718 bytes
That's old news.
-- 
Talking to yourself is ok, as long as you don't get an answer.

Mike N.

My new pyro site http://www.angelfire.com/co2/kno3/index.html (frames)
under construction


Don wrote:
> 
> You have been duped.  It was a hoax
> Don Smith
> Victoria Legal Research Co.
> 
> Mike N. <705728@ican.net> wrote in message <371C3369.21970CAC@ican.net>...
> >The government is quietly trying to push a bill that will allow them to
> >charge you an extra $0.05 for every email received. Just think that is
> >you receive 10 messages a day for a year that would amount to $180 above
> >your internet costs. You really would be paying for spam. This money
> >would be paid to Canada post directly as "alternate postage fees" for a
> >service they do not even provide. The bill is 602p, call your local MP
> >and say no, or things may change for the worst.
> >--
> >Talking to yourself is ok, as long as you don't get an answer.
> >
> >Mike N.
> >
> >My new pyro site http://www.angelfire.com/co2/kno3/index.html (frames)
> >under construction
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads