Thread View: rec.railroad
5 messages
5 total messages
Started by Loren Petrich
Mon, 19 Jun 1995 00:00
My Long Trip: June 17-18, 1995 [LONG!]
Author: Loren Petrich
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 1995 00:00
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 1995 00:00
226 lines
12961 bytes
12961 bytes
My Long Trip: June 16-17 I took a very long trip that day, from Livermore to San Jose to Sacramento and back to Livermore (though by a bit more direct route :-). Here is how the trip went, organized by subject. I note in passing that I spent much of the time reading Marc Reisner's book _Cadillac Desert_, about the history of water projects in the western United States (sort of like socialism ran amok :-). * BART to Dublin/Pleasanton: I-580 The bulk of the Dublin-Pleasanton BART extension runs in I-238/I-580 from BART's Fremont Line eastward to those two towns. Here is an east-to-west report: At eastern D/P, east of the Hopyard-Road bridge, the interior of the station was still under construction, with walls, pillars, and rebar frameworks visible. The bus I rode turned off the freeway at the aforementioned bridge, however, and did not return to it until it reached the Foothill Rd. bridge. There was no track in D/P proper, though the ground was flattened and the road barriers built. From there on, it was almost continuous track all the way to Castro Valley, with a few breaks in the north-side track (one at a long, curving bridge and one in CV itself). The bulk of the retaining walls on the sides of the CV station appeared done, but it was harder to see what was going on with the station platforms. The tracks were partially done to the west of there, but I got an incomplete picture, since the bus turned off at the I-580/I-238 interchange. But some weeks back, I did go by there, and the most that was evident was some flattened ground and some partial barrier construction. At this level of completeness, I'm not surprised that the opening of this extension has been put off until the middle of next year. * BART to Dublin/Pleasanton: BayFair South Yard and Junction :-) This is actually two sidings and a center track just south of BayFair station, and some switches for the D/P extension track to depart. That extra center track turns into the eastbound track, and goes over the northbound one in a flyover bridge. They had been wiring those two sidings (there were big spools of electrical cable there), and when I passed by it on my way to San Jose, I noticed that one of those spools had moved to the center track near where the flyover begins. When I returned the next day, it was too dark to see much, but at Hayward, there was a big sign reminding everybody to use the west-side (southbound) platform for all of the trains -- meaning that the east-side track had been closed that day. There is also some rebuilding of the I-238 bridge over the BART and UP tracks; currently, the north-side lanes are done, while half of the south-side lanes are now demolished and some new bridge piers are going up. One thing interesting is that the construction has created a jag in the UP line; I wonder if the UP trains have to slow down very much for it. * San Jose LRT I took BART southward to Fremont, and then the Santa Clara County bus southward to downtown San Jose. There are plans to built a BART line to downtown SJ, but they have been stalled by endless bickering over such things as its great cost. I got off at the Civic Center LRT station, and I waited for a LR train. I rode it to the hotel where I stayed the line, but it had already gotten very dark, and it was difficult for me to tell where I was. I wanted to get off at the Convention Center, where my hotel was, and I did it by dead reckoning. I had heard a less-than-clear announcement of the Paseo de San Antonio, and I looked out the window and noticed that. That meant that the Convention Center was next, just around the curve. Sure enough, the LRV went around a sharp curve, and I got off at the next station -- which *was* the Convention Center :-). Otherwise, the SJ LRV's were *very* nice -- comfortable, smooth, and quiet. * Amtrak California: the California Capitols to Sacramento and Back I took a taxi to the San Jose Amtrak station, which still had "Southern Pacific" on it, and I ate a bit of breakfast there; it was nice that the station building had now been reopened. The train pulled in, and I got a very big and very pleasant surprise -- I saw a train come in that had the new California Cars, which looked something like Superliners with a different paint job. There was also a Superliner diner (evidently, Caltrans still hasn't gotten those). And it had a California Loco pointing northward, towards Sacramento. Interestingly, the new schedule stated that between Emeryville and San Jose, the Capitols would be replaced by Amtrak buses (Ambuses) that would take 20 min. longer to run -- on every day but Saturday, when I made my trip. There were a lot of people there, and one thing that helped was a beep coming from the open doors. We can thank the handicapped lobby for that :-) Also, the CalCars had little signs on them indicating which train they were, actually a very convenient feature, though it is not as useful as it would be if there were a large number of trains coming and going. I got on, went up to the upper level, and found a seat. The seats were half-forward and half-backward, as if for push-pull duty, and some of the seats were around tables. I sat near a window, of course :-), but the windows were *big*, and I could get a good view of *both* sides. Though the narrowness of the seats has stirred up some controversy, I did not find them excessively narrow for myself. The aisles were very wide, thanx to the handicapped lobby :-), and there was a little sign inside like the ones on the outside announcing which train it was. My train was a bit late in leaving, but I knew we were moving when I heard the CalLoco rev up like a freight loco. The CalCars were very quiet inside (the main thing I could hear was the A/C), and the suspension seemed very good. My train was held up a few minutes at Niles Junction; apparently a UP dispatcher had forgotten to reset some signals. On its way northward (geographic north, not SP north :-), the train paralleled the BART line, often being a block or two away. The BART line was on a concrete el, and it did not seem very obtrusive. My train stopped at the new Jack London Square station in Oakland, and already there was the Coast Starlight, with two AMD-103's up front. The CS was, for some curious reason, on the track nearest the station building, which threatened to block off my train. But my train got past the end of the CS. There was a short pause in west Oakland, for no clear reason (possibly another train which was stopping, and which might have used some upcoming track). North of the BART el, there was not much evidence of construction of the replacement freeway there -- mainly a lot of destruction :-) -- a pile of dirt and broken-up pavement where some of the yard used to be. The 16th-and-Wood SP/Amtrak station was now deserted, but still standing. To the north, however, there were some pillars in place and a short section of new freeway in place. Berkeley was only a short distance from Emeryville; that station seems suspiciously porky :-) [Especially when one can easily go to Emeryville or Richmond from Berkeley]. Onward and north-east-northward -- a lot of pleasant scenery. The stretch of track between Richmond and Martinez, especially the more mountainous parts west of Martinez, seem to be a favorite spot to photograph trains at :-). Past Martinez, going up the grade to the bridge, I saw another Capitol come buy -- a CalLoco in front, four CalCars, and a Superliner diner. Going through the Central Valley always gives me the pleasure of watching farmers waste water :-), though I did not see too much of that this time around. The Causeway Zone near Sacramento was still single-tracked (no work apparent to replace the missing causeway tracks), and for some reason, my train switched over to the other track to go the rest of the way to Sacramento (the other track was getting a bit rusty on top). At Sacramento, where the station also had "Southern Pacific" on it, I checked out the new info terminals, which were in the style of some airport ones (I didn't have the time to try out those at San Jose). Not as fancy as I'd like, though still rather good. They had a list of all the Amtrak California stops, and had varying amounts of detail about each of them (some had maps and some didn't). They also had mentioned numerous local transit agencies, but only had a map of BART. Also at that station, there were (as usual) some Ambuses. Returning, there were a lot of people getting on at Sacramento, and I had to sit away from a window. And the conductor only got around to my ticket *after* the train had stopped at Fairfield. The train was held up a couple of minutes at the bridge over the San Joaquin River; there was a ship passing through, and the bridge's center section had been raised to allow the ship to pass. Interestingly, the "Superliners" on both trains were not "true" Superliners but old double-decker Santa Fe El Capitan diners, which now had an Amtrak paint job. The seats were nice and plush, and the windows had blinds one could pull down. And I could tell that they were still turning Capitols at both San Jose and Sacramento; at least the one that I was riding to Sac'to got turned for its return. This was despite its having a cab car at the end (well, that's good for turning also, since turning at a wye requires backing up). The Central-Valley track seemed a bit rough, even when experienced through the good suspension of the CalCars. There was supposed to be some sort of deal with SP to improve that track and rebuild the second track through the Causeway Zone, but I have no idea what has come of it -- is it still bogged down in negotiations? There are also some plans to extend some Capitol runs to Reno, NV, which would be nice for all the skiers :-), but I don't know what's happened. SP's single-tracking of parts of the Donner Pass might make life a bit difficult. * The California State Railroad Museum A very nice place. Recommended for train-brains everywhere :-) And only a short walk from the Amtrak station there. It contains a big collection of antique RR rolling stock; when I went, some privately owned railcars had shown up; some of them are available for tourists who want the ultimate vacation :-). There were also some model-railroad exhibits; some on a rather grandiose scale :-). However, most of what was there I had already seen before, but I did find two things new. There is supposed to be a Museum of Railroad Technology to be built near the CSRM; presumably a little to the south of it; there is a bond issue to go to the voters some months for now. The opening date: if everything goes well, 2000. * The Sacramento LRT I took a ride on it to see how much had gotten double-tracked. A good fraction of it now is, and there's a gap that is now filled between 29th and 59th Sts. However, the following is still single-tracked: the Bee Bridge (between 13th and 16th Sts.; named after the newspaper building it goes by), some parts east of 69th St. / Univ., including the curvy, bridge over the SP line, the sharp S-curve just south of Royal Oaks, and the track at the I-80/Watt stations. I was disappointed at the paucity of rail-advocacy publications I had found this year (other years were better :-), so I got nothing on plans to extend this LRT and to build a downtown antique-trolley loop. The Sacramento LRV's were also nice, if not as fancy as the San Jose ones (I don't like the facing seating; I prefer stretches of single-direction seating). I just hope that the San Francisco Muni does not take forever to replace those rolling junkheaps that pass for LRV's, and that their replacements, which are now arriving, will be a significant improvement. -- Loren Petrich, the Master Blaster Happiness is a fast Macintosh petrich@netcom.com And a fast train Visit ftp://ftp.netcom.com/pub/pe/petrich Or ftp to ftp.netcom.com, then go to /pub/pe/petrich
Re: My Long Trip: June 17-18, 1995 [LONG!]
Author: Espeecial1
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 1995 00:00
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 1995 00:00
14 lines
1475 bytes
1475 bytes
++I took a very long trip that day, from Livermore to San Jose to Sacramento and back to Livermore (though by a bit more direct route :-). Here is how the trip went, organized by subject. I note in passing that I spent much of the time reading Marc Reisner's book _Cadillac Desert_, about the history of water projects in the western United States (sort of like socialism ran amok :-).++ rest of boring story cut=== Hopefully, we don't have to have this boring stuff tie up bandwidth every week. Such info belongs on rec.dorky.travel. By the way, someone teach this character which way is *north* on the SP -- their ain't such a thing.
Re: My Long Trip: June 17-18, 1995 [LONG!]
Author: Christopher D Coleman
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 1995 00:00
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 1995 00:00
26 lines
2134 bytes
2134 bytes
In article <3s2u23$4c8@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, espeecial1@aol.com (Espeecial1) writes: |> ++I took a very long trip that day, from Livermore to San Jose |> to Sacramento and back to Livermore (though by a bit more direct route |> :-). Here is how the trip went, organized by subject. I note in |> passing that I spent much of the time reading Marc Reisner's book |> _Cadillac Desert_, about the history of water projects in the western |> United States (sort of like socialism ran amok :-).++ |> |> rest of boring story cut=== |> |> Hopefully, we don't have to have this boring stuff tie up bandwidth every |> week. Such info belongs on rec.dorky.travel. If you don't like it, don't read it! You post belongs in alt.flame. ______________________________ Chris |\ \ colemanc@infinet.com |*\_____________________________\ colemanc@er4.eng.ohio-state.edu |**|===LIONEL ELECTRIC TRAINS===| Columbus, Ohio |\*|**+======================+**| r.m.r Tinpate FAQ author | \|**| W&H +--+ Digital |**| The Webville and Hypertext RR Co. | |--| RR CO | | Service |--|http://www.he.tdl.com/~colemanc/webville.html \ | |-===-----+==+-----===-| |ftp he.tdl.com /pub/colemanc \ | +-~~~--------------~~~-+ | \|____________________________|
Re: My Long Trip: June 17-18, 1995 [LONG!]
Author: Rick Miller
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 1995 00:00
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 1995 00:00
13 lines
1340 bytes
1340 bytes
In article <3s2u23$4c8@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, espeecial1@aol.com (Espeecial1) wrote: >Hopefully, we don't have to have this boring stuff tie up bandwidth every >week. Such info belongs on rec.dorky.travel. Who died and made you moderator? If you don't like it, don't read it...if you don't like the group, don't drop in. If you don't have something constructive to say about someone's posts, keep quiet. -- Rick Miller __ rmiller@execpc.com Milwuakee, Wisconsin Amiga 2500 \/ B3 f+ t+ w- g+ k++ Fidonet: Richard Miller 1:154/280
Re: My Long Trip: June 17-18, 1995 [LONG!]
Author: Ronald Owen Carlson
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 1995 00:00
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 1995 00:00
16 lines
1607 bytes
1607 bytes
Christopher D Coleman (colemanc@er4.eng.ohio-state.edu) wrote: : In article <3s2u23$4c8@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, espeecial1@aol.com (Espeecial1) writes: : |> ++I took a very long trip that day, from Livermore to San Jose : |> rest of boring story cut=== : |> : |> Hopefully, we don't have to have this boring stuff tie up bandwidth every : |> week. Such info belongs on rec.dorky.travel. : If you don't like it, don't read it! You post belongs in alt.flame. I enjoyed it. But then again, I'm just another "dorky" railfan. Oh, that's what this group is about, isn't it? I'm so happy I've found you, or is it us? Ron
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads