Article View: rec.running
Article #1337Re: Nike Air Pegasus vs. Air Anodyne
From: Ken Papai
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 20:48
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 20:48
22 lines
1566 bytes
1566 bytes
(David Ross) writes: >Is the Air Anodyne built on the same last as the Pegasus? If so, >how do they compare on support/cushioning/stability? >I ask because I'm a long-time Pegasus wearer (every attempt to switch >to other brands in recent years has caused injuries), but my current >shoes are compressing and the local dealers don't have my size (10EE) >in stock on the Pegasus. (Moreover, the distributer on the mainland >seems to be backordered through January.) I think I can get the Anodyne >in my size, but only want to do so if the shoe isn't too different Posting my reply since the mailed bounced. I've gone through lots of Air Peg shoes and have always liked them. I alternate them every other day with Air 180's or Air Anodynes. I like the Anodynes a lot. The toe room is a bit tighter though. They seem to have plenty of cushioning, support, & stability. As a strictly Nike wearer, and one who has semi flat feet and wide feet, 11.5 EE or so, I can recommend the Anodynes. Ken Papai Sunnyvale, CA (I wear the width the stores stock, which seems to always be D width, maybe I ought to find a store with E widths?)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<BxzDtH.4D8@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!decwrl!pacbell.com!tandem!zorch!kpapaiReferences:
<1992Nov19.025405.19915@news.Hawaii.Edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: rec.running Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!decwrl!pacbell.com!tandem!zorch!kpapai From: kpapai@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG (Ken Papai) Subject: Re: Nike Air Pegasus vs. Air Anodyne Message-ID: <BxzDtH.4D8@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG> Organization: SF-Bay Public-Access Unix References: <1992Nov19.025405.19915@news.Hawaii.Edu> Distribution: na Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 20:48:52 GMT Lines: 22