Re: Nike Any Good? (was: Nike Air Pegasus vs. Air Anodyne)

Article View: rec.running

Article #1378

#1378

From: Thomas Page
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 17:41

13 lines
1341 bytes

In article <1992Nov21.181236.14186@eng.umd.edu>, gsurbeck@eng.umd.edu (Gregory D. Surbeck) writes:
|> A few years ago I ran a cross country season in Air Pegasus.  They
|> were okay but nothing phenomenal.  I switched to Asics and the Air
|> Pegasus just didn't compare.  I have watched the Pegasus's prices go
|> up and up and they just can't compete with shoes in a similar price
|> range.  I have a friend who's Airs blew out (not Pegasus) and she
|> can't afford to get another pair of shoes so she has to swim (perish
|> the thought)!  
|> 

I was under the impression that Nike unconditionally guaranteed the air units.
Your friend should just return them to the store where she bought them.
Tom

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Nov23.174145.9970@cs.ucla.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ucla-cs!ficus.cs.ucla.edu!page

References:

<BxzDtH.4D8@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG> <92325.101517IO10644@MAINE.MAINE.EDU> <1992Nov20.143445.1818@guvax.acc.georgetown.edu> <1992Nov21.181236.14186@eng.umd.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: rec.running
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ucla-cs!ficus.cs.ucla.edu!page
From: page@ficus.cs.ucla.edu (Thomas Page)
Subject: Re: Nike Any Good? (was: Nike Air Pegasus vs. Air Anodyne)
Message-ID: <1992Nov23.174145.9970@cs.ucla.edu>
Sender: usenet@cs.ucla.edu (Mr Usenet)
Nntp-Posting-Host: wingfield.cs.ucla.edu
Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department
References: <BxzDtH.4D8@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG> <92325.101517IO10644@MAINE.MAINE.EDU> <1992Nov20.143445.1818@guvax.acc.georgetown.edu> <1992Nov21.181236.14186@eng.umd.edu>
Distribution: na,world
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 92 17:41:45 GMT
Lines: 13

Reply to Parent Message