Posting private email..

Article View: rec.scouting

Article #1553

#1553

From: Stan Krieger
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 18:31

16 lines
1039 bytes

Carl M. Kadie writes:

>>I should have said that the CONTENTS of the letter remain the
>>property of the author....

>This is ambiguous. To the best of my understanding here is want is
>legal and illegal (disclaimer: I'm not a lawyer)....

Let's not lose sight of the fact that there was no legal issue
involved.  It was strictly a netiquette issue; Dominick posted
my private e-mail to him without my consent or knowledge.
-- 
Stan Krieger                 All opinions, advice, or suggestions, even
UNIX System Laboratories     if related to my employment, are my own.
Summit, NJ
smk@usl.com

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Nov18.183131.26919@cbnewsl.cb.att.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!att-out!cbnewsl!stank

References: <Bxo10K.4M7@cs.uiuc.edu> <1992Nov18.150853.10999@sei.cmu.edu> <BxxB24.5st@cs.uiuc.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: rec.scouting
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!att-out!cbnewsl!stank
From: stank@cbnewsl.cb.att.com (Stan Krieger)
Subject: Posting private email..
Organization: Summit NJ
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 18:31:31 GMT
Message-ID: <1992Nov18.183131.26919@cbnewsl.cb.att.com>
References: <Bxo10K.4M7@cs.uiuc.edu> <1992Nov18.150853.10999@sei.cmu.edu> <BxxB24.5st@cs.uiuc.edu>
Lines: 16

Reply to Parent Message