Thread View: rec.skydiving
83 messages
83 total messages
Page 1 of 2
Started by Peter Lucas
Tue, 05 Oct 2010 21:59
Page 1 of 2 • 83 total messages
what ''shit' ' for the common wealth games..............
Author: Peter Lucas
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 21:59
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 21:59
18 lines
2307 bytes
2307 bytes
Now THIS is were we send our athleets?!? Was always been puzzled as to why so many indians would in the frikken busy sidewalks or even road sides would simply stop and squat - leaving behind a pile of shit full of lentils and curry. Later found out that as many as 850 million indians do not have access to toilet facilities. Hence the famous indian stop and squat. Wow! Just do the math. The estimated cost of staging the Common wealth games ranges from US$4 billion to a wild $23 billion. Surely that money could have built a lot of frikken toilets! Enough to serve the 850 million stop-and-squatting incompetant indians. And THIS is were we send our best too?!-- Just a thought. Peter Lucas Brisbane Australia
Re: what ''shit' ' Now concerns for Pacific Rim peace and solving Peters sanitary dilemma
Author: OldFella
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 02:21
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 02:21
33 lines
2702 bytes
2702 bytes
"the unknown flailer" <thuythu@iwon.com> wrote in message
news:572a6938-84e4-48ce-a2dc-c95c7e45836c@f26g2000vbm.googlegroups.com...
<Snip>
>He and his gay programmer friends in Tasmania have quited down since I
>took a interest, like the NSA was on their trail
63.174.133.193
Country: UNITED STATES
Region: TEXAS
City: HENDERSON
Latitude: 32.1489
Longitude: -94.781
Obviously another George W. Bush supporter , sounds like another
wannabe NSA employee, here's the link to apply for a job with them :-) gotta
feel sorry for a person like you.
https://www.nsa.gov/psp/applyonline/EMPLOYEE/HRMS/c/HRS_HRAM.HRS_CE.GBL?Page=HRS_CE_HM_PRE&Action=A&SiteId=1
Another very interesting website:
http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/bushquotes/a/dumbbushquotes.htm
More ramblings:
http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/blbushisms.htm
Re: what ''shit' ' Now concerns for Pacific Rim peace and solving Peters sanitary dilemma
Author: Aussie
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 02:43
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 02:43
43 lines
3036 bytes
3036 bytes
"OldFella" <NoSpam@hotmail.com> wrote in news:4cc0f544$0$25359$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au: > > "the unknown flailer" <thuythu@iwon.com> wrote in message > news:572a6938-84e4-48ce-a2dc- c95c7e45836c@f26g2000vbm.googlegroups.com... > > <Snip> > >>He and his gay programmer friends in Tasmania have quited down since I >>took a interest, like the NSA was on their trail > > > > 63.174.133.193 > > Country: UNITED STATES > Region: TEXAS > City: HENDERSON > Latitude: 32.1489 > Longitude: -94.781 The "the unknown flailer" aka "Snuffy" is a pathetic little troll wannabe/usetabe that hangs out in rec.skydiving baiting anyone and everyone so that people will 'talk' to it and make its pathetic life meaningful for that day. It has been kicked out of any and all the moderated skydiving forums as it's a completely useless waste of oxygen, with nothing at all to contribute to anything. -- Peter Lucas Hobart Tasmania If riding in an airplane is flying, then riding in a boat is swimming..If you want to experience the element, get out of the vehicle !
Re: what ''shit' ' Now concerns for Pacific Rim peace and solving Peters sanitary dilemma
Author: OldFella
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 03:51
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 03:51
61 lines
3673 bytes
3673 bytes
"Aussie" <Aussie@home.upstairs.in.brissie.aus> wrote in message news:Xns9E19817D62864Peterhomeinbrissie@61.9.134.55... > "OldFella" <NoSpam@hotmail.com> wrote in > news:4cc0f544$0$25359$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au: > >> >> "the unknown flailer" <thuythu@iwon.com> wrote in message >> news:572a6938-84e4-48ce-a2dc- > c95c7e45836c@f26g2000vbm.googlegroups.com... >> >> <Snip> >> >>>He and his gay programmer friends in Tasmania have quited down since I >>>took a interest, like the NSA was on their trail >> >> >> >> 63.174.133.193 >> >> Country: UNITED STATES >> Region: TEXAS >> City: HENDERSON >> Latitude: 32.1489 >> Longitude: -94.781 > > > > The "the unknown flailer" aka "Snuffy" is a pathetic little troll > wannabe/usetabe that hangs out in rec.skydiving baiting anyone and > everyone so that people will 'talk' to it and make its pathetic life > meaningful for that day. > > > It has been kicked out of any and all the moderated skydiving forums as > it's a completely useless waste of oxygen, with nothing at all to > contribute to anything. > > > -- > Peter Lucas > Hobart > Tasmania > > If riding in an airplane is flying, then riding in a boat is swimming..If > you want to experience the element, get out of the vehicle ! G'day Peter, I like they way you refer to the subject or P.O.I.( person of interest) or in his case Person of No Interest , as "it" no doubt IT will keep up the ranting, there was a person like it in a couple of Amateur and CB Radio N/G's a long while back, he was obviously compulsively obcessed with being the head honcho in the news groups, even when most readers ignored his postings he would copy and paste his earlier postings flooding the N/G with his trash, most people using Outlook Express simply did the Block Sender trick, it made for much better reading , anyhow enough from me, Have a good one, OldFella
Re: what ''shit' ' Now concerns for Pacific Rim peace and solving Peters sanitary dilemma
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 06:13
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 06:13
33 lines
3146 bytes
3146 bytes
On Oct 21, 9:21 pm, "OldFella" <NoS...@hotmail.com> wrote: > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in messagenews:572a6938-84e4-48ce-a2dc-c95c7e45836c@f26g2000vbm.googlegroups.com... > > <Snip> > > >He and his gay programmer friends in Tasmania have quited down since I > >took a interest, like the NSA was on their trail > > 63.174.133.193 > > Country: UNITED STATES > Region: TEXAS > City: HENDERSON > Latitude: 32.1489 > Longitude: -94.781 > Not even close....Another guy had me down around Shepard.....Either yawls soft ware sucks or the backwoods routing system changes gateways depending on time of day day of week or who's asking. Effective eh? > Obviously another George W. Bush supporter , sounds like another > wannabe NSA employee, here's the link to apply for a job with them :-) gotta > feel sorry for a person like you. > Not even close again, I voted against the asshole in every election, even when he was running for Governor of Texas. . ;-*
Re: what ''shit' ' Now concerns for Pacific Rim peace and solving Peters sanitary dilemma
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 06:19
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 06:19
44 lines
3371 bytes
3371 bytes
On Oct 21, 9:43 pm, Aussie <Aus...@home.upstairs.in.brissie.aus> wrote: > "OldFella" <NoS...@hotmail.com> wrote innews:4cc0f544$0$25359$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au: > > > > > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in message > > news:572a6938-84e4-48ce-a2dc- > > c95c7e458...@f26g2000vbm.googlegroups.com... > > > > > <Snip> > > >>He and his gay programmer friends in Tasmania have quited down since I > >>took a interest, like the NSA was on their trail > > > 63.174.133.193 > > > Country: UNITED STATES > > Region: TEXAS > > City: HENDERSON > > Latitude: 32.1489 > > Longitude: -94.781 > > The "the unknown flailer" aka "Snuffy" is a pathetic little troll > wannabe/usetabe that hangs out in rec.skydiving baiting anyone and > everyone so that people will 'talk' to it and make its pathetic life > meaningful for that day. > > It has been kicked out of any and all the moderated skydiving forums as > it's a completely useless waste of oxygen, with nothing at all to > contribute to anything. > > -- > Peter Lucas > Hobart > Tasmania > I call them like I see them and that seems to piss nervous people off....I love pissing losers---Foreign or Domestic off and you qualify drag queen.
Re: what ''shit' ' Now concerns for Pacific Rim peace and solving Peters sanitary dilemma
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 06:34
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 06:34
72 lines
5248 bytes
5248 bytes
On Oct 11, 9:09 am, Krypsis <kryp...@optusnet.com.au> wrote: > On 11/10/2010 12:27 PM, the unknown flailer wrote: > > > > > > > On Oct 9, 9:43 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" > > <rhondaleak...@earthling.net> wrote: > >> the unknown flailer wrote: > >>> On Oct 7, 2:24 pm, george<gbl...@hnpl.net> wrote: > >>>> On Oct 6, 10:59 am, Peter Lucas<ruthsbed...@lavabit.com> wrote: > > >>>>> Just a thought. > > >>>> Comes of jumping without a canopy I'm afraid but as he landed on his > >>>> head there was no damage apart from a strange need to post crap... > > >>> I think Peter is a natural, a small man with a small spirit and what > >>> there is of it is mean...He over compensates by acting ugly...Also a > >>> huge amount of petty jealousy is involved...His country was passed > >>> over for India to hold the games.. A real kick in the Brisbane balls. > >>> A pair of what GB and her Colonials call gum boots but known as Rubber > >>> boots in the good Ole USA should solve his complaint. I personally > >>> think Canada should have got the games----They are part of North > >>> America and not as backward as Australia thanks to their neighbor to > >>> the Souths influence. ~zing zing right up the kazoo~ 0~;-) Snuffy > >>> "promoter of peace between third world Nations" > > >> Your brains have leaked out of your ears entirely. > > >> Peter has nothing to do with any of these posts, you stupid, senile old man.- Hide quoted text - > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > He and his gay programmer friends in Tasmania have quited down since I > > took a interest, like the NSA was on their trail > > "quited"??? "took a interest"??? Looks like the English grammar wasn't > your forte in school. > > By the way, the NSA has nothing to do with Australia. The National > Security Agency/Central Security Service (NSA/CSS) is a cryptologic > intelligence agency of the United States Department of Defense > responsible for the collection and analysis of foreign communications > and foreign signals intelligence, as well as protecting U.S. government > communications and information systems,[1] which involves cryptanalysis > and cryptography. As such, Peter and his friends, whatever their > orientation, have nothing to fear from the NSA > > Krypsis- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Dunno, everything has changed in the 50 years since I've been out....It used to be a electronic Intelligence collecting agency and had use of a para military arm from the Company to do its dirty work....Even Navy rates have changed, used to be CT's were crypto technicians and mainly spied on the airwaves...Now CT's are Communication Techs and have replaced the Radioman rate, of course appearances can be deceiving I figure they still have a separate branch of CT's that listens to everybody's traffic....What used to piss me off was sure they spied on USSR Communications but they monitored us also, pretty chicken shit spying on your own people if you ask me, They did it to enforce radio procedure but it still pissed Fleet Radiomen off. So there you are whipper snapper a history lesson in comm from someone who was there half a century ago on active service. ;)P
Re: what ''shit' ' Now concerns for Pacific Rim peace and solving Peters sanitary dilemma
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 06:41
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 06:41
35 lines
3487 bytes
3487 bytes
On Oct 9, 9:43 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhondaleak...@earthling.net> wrote: > the unknown flailer wrote: > > On Oct 7, 2:24 pm, george <gbl...@hnpl.net> wrote: > >> On Oct 6, 10:59 am, Peter Lucas <ruthsbed...@lavabit.com> wrote: > > >>> Just a thought. > > >> Comes of jumping without a canopy I'm afraid but as he landed on his > >> head there was no damage apart from a strange need to post crap... > > > I think Peter is a natural, a small man with a small spirit and what > > there is of it is mean...He over compensates by acting ugly...Also a > > huge amount of petty jealousy is involved...His country was passed > > over for India to hold the games.. A real kick in the Brisbane balls. > > A pair of what GB and her Colonials call gum boots but known as Rubber > > boots in the good Ole USA should solve his complaint. I personally > > think Canada should have got the games----They are part of North > > America and not as backward as Australia thanks to their neighbor to > > the Souths influence. ~zing zing right up the kazoo~ 0~;-) Snuffy > > "promoter of peace between third world Nations" > > Your brains have leaked out of your ears entirely. > > Peter has nothing to do with any of these posts, you stupid, senile old man.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Ahhhhh I'm cumming, you made my month woman and BTW Peters enough of a schemer to set up fake accounts to fool young dumb ass's like you and Whineor to get away with filth while appearing to be the injured party...Ever think of that Missy know it all? Now give me tung Jersey girl ;)P
Re: what ''shit' ' Now concerns for Pacific Rim peace and solving Peters sanitary dilemma
Author: Sunny
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 07:25
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 07:25
9 lines
1866 bytes
1866 bytes
"the unknown flailer" <thuythu@iwon.com> wrote in message news:bed1af5a-0b18-4249-b913-aa703d30b17a@p26g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... Ahhhhh I'm cumming, you made my month woman and BTW Peters enough of a schemer to set up fake accounts to fool <snip rest of garbage> ** Are you going through a second childhood, or you just a boofhead ?
Re: what ''shit' ' Now concerns for Pacific Rim peace and solving Peters sanitary dilemma
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 14:03
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 14:03
14 lines
2307 bytes
2307 bytes
On Oct 22, 2:25 am, "Sunny" <wombatho...@yahoo.com.au> wrote: > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in messagenews:bed1af5a-0b18-4249-b913-aa703d30b17a@p26g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... > > Ahhhhh I'm cumming, you made my month woman and BTW Peters enough of a > schemer to set up fake accounts to fool > <snip rest of garbage> > > ** Are you going through a second childhood, or you just a boofhead ? I like to see phonies pop their corks and point out deceivers & filthy scum bags like the down under crew. Things like this amuse me. "boofhead".... are you old enough to post child does your mommy know you are on a computer? ;->
Re: what ''shit' ' Now concerns for Pacific Rim peace and solving Peters sanitary dilemma
Author: Krypsis
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 14:18
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 14:18
77 lines
5122 bytes
5122 bytes
On 22/10/2010 5:34 PM, the unknown flailer wrote: > On Oct 11, 9:09 am, Krypsis<kryp...@optusnet.com.au> wrote: >> On 11/10/2010 12:27 PM, the unknown flailer wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Oct 9, 9:43 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" >>> <rhondaleak...@earthling.net> wrote: >>>> the unknown flailer wrote: >>>>> On Oct 7, 2:24 pm, george<gbl...@hnpl.net> wrote: >>>>>> On Oct 6, 10:59 am, Peter Lucas<ruthsbed...@lavabit.com> wrote: >> >>>>>>> Just a thought. >> >>>>>> Comes of jumping without a canopy I'm afraid but as he landed on his >>>>>> head there was no damage apart from a strange need to post crap... >> >>>>> I think Peter is a natural, a small man with a small spirit and what >>>>> there is of it is mean...He over compensates by acting ugly...Also a >>>>> huge amount of petty jealousy is involved...His country was passed >>>>> over for India to hold the games.. A real kick in the Brisbane balls. >>>>> A pair of what GB and her Colonials call gum boots but known as Rubber >>>>> boots in the good Ole USA should solve his complaint. I personally >>>>> think Canada should have got the games----They are part of North >>>>> America and not as backward as Australia thanks to their neighbor to >>>>> the Souths influence. ~zing zing right up the kazoo~ 0~;-) Snuffy >>>>> "promoter of peace between third world Nations" >> >>>> Your brains have leaked out of your ears entirely. >> >>>> Peter has nothing to do with any of these posts, you stupid, senile old man.- Hide quoted text - >> >>>> - Show quoted text - >> >>> He and his gay programmer friends in Tasmania have quited down since I >>> took a interest, like the NSA was on their trail >> >> "quited"??? "took a interest"??? Looks like the English grammar wasn't >> your forte in school. >> >> By the way, the NSA has nothing to do with Australia. The National >> Security Agency/Central Security Service (NSA/CSS) is a cryptologic >> intelligence agency of the United States Department of Defense >> responsible for the collection and analysis of foreign communications >> and foreign signals intelligence, as well as protecting U.S. government >> communications and information systems,[1] which involves cryptanalysis >> and cryptography. As such, Peter and his friends, whatever their >> orientation, have nothing to fear from the NSA >> >> Krypsis- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > Dunno, everything has changed in the 50 years since I've been > out....It used to be a electronic Intelligence collecting agency and Nothing stays the same ... except your childish level of intelligence. Actually, I think it's regressing if anything! > had use of a para military arm from the Company to do its dirty > work....Even Navy rates have changed, > used to be CT's were crypto technicians and mainly spied on the > airwaves...Now CT's are Communication Techs > and have replaced the Radioman rate, of course appearances can be > deceiving I figure they still have a separate branch of CT's that > listens to everybody's traffic....What used to piss me off was sure > they spied on USSR Communications but they monitored us also, pretty > chicken shit spying on your own people if you ask me, They did it to > enforce radio procedure but it still pissed Fleet Radiomen off. So > there you are whipper snapper a history lesson in comm from someone > who was there half a century ago on active service. ;)P At 73, I qualify as "there half a century ago" as well. So what? Krypsis
Re: what ''shit' ' for the common wealth games..............
Author: Chemo the Clown
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:34
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:34
15 lines
1949 bytes
1949 bytes
On Oct 5, 3:37 pm, Chemo the Clown <an...@peak.org> wrote: > On Oct 5, 3:08 pm, notbob <not...@nothome.com> wrote: > > > On 2010-10-05, Peter Lucas <ruthsbed...@lavabit.com> wrote: > > > > sides would simply stop and squat - leaving behind a pile of > > > shit..... > > > Much like you posts, here. Back in the crap corral with you. > > > nb > > I wish he could write in complete sentence structure....at the least. I don't think 4 years can quite do that yet.
Re: what ''shit' ' Now concerns for Pacific Rim peace and solving Peters sanitary dilemma
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 22:20
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 22:20
20 lines
2333 bytes
2333 bytes
On Oct 22, 9:18 am, Krypsis <kryp...@optusnet.com.au> wrote: > On 22/10/2010 5:34 PM, the unknown flailer wrote: > > > > > > > On Oct 11, 9:09 am, Krypsis<kryp...@optusnet.com.au> wrote: > >> On 11/10/2010 12:27 PM, the unknown flailer wrote: > > someone who was there half a century ago on active service. ;)P > > At 73, I qualify as "there half a century ago" as well. So what? > > Krypsis- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - No you don't, you are just another sissy foreigner, you fairies never could win a war without us carrying you.
Re: what ''shit' ' Now concerns for Pacific Rim peace and working to improve anglo relations
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 00:29
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 00:29
16 lines
2235 bytes
2235 bytes
On Oct 22, 9:18 am, Krypsis <kryp...@optusnet.com.au> wrote: > On 22/10/2010 5:34 PM, the unknown flailer wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>0~;-) Snuffy "promoter of peace between third world Nations" > At 73, I qualify as "there half a century ago" as well. So what? > > Krypsis- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Nothing but Fags and crooks in your part of the Pacific Rim so you have been one or the other for 73 years, what you want me to do pop a flare?
Re: what ''shit' ' Now concerns for Pacific Rim peace, they have bad attitudes after we rescued them in the 40's
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 03:29
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 03:29
13 lines
2243 bytes
2243 bytes
On Oct 22, 2:25 am, "Sunny" <wombatho...@yahoo.com.au> wrote: > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in messagenews:bed1af5a-0b18-4249-b913-aa703d30b17a@p26g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... > > Ahhhhh I'm cumming, you made my month woman and BTW Peters enough of a > schemer to set up fake accounts to fool > <snip rest of garbage> > > ** Are you going through a second childhood, or you just a boofhead ? Dayum I try to be cement good relations between the U.S. & white trash like the Tas-maniacs and Au-strange-aliens then they get in a snit. 0~;->
Re: what ''shit' ' Now the difference between colony's down under and on this side of the Pacific. Anthropological thesis
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 07:06
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 07:06
61 lines
5331 bytes
5331 bytes
On Oct 24, 10:29 pm, the unknown flailer <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote: > On Oct 22, 2:25 am, "Sunny" <wombatho...@yahoo.com.au> wrote: > > > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in messagenews:bed1af5a-0b18-4249-b913-aa703d30b17a@p26g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... > > > Ahhhhh I'm cumming, you made my month woman and BTW Peters enough of a > > schemer to set up fake accounts to fool > > <snip rest of garbage> > > > ** Are you going through a second childhood, or you just a boofhead ? > > Dayum I try to be cement good relations between the U.S. & white trash > like the Tas-maniacs and Au-strange-aliens then they get in a snit. > 0~;-> But thats to be expected, Australia and Tasmania were English prison colony's unlike the U.S. and Canada where furs and crops were paramount or the Caribbean Islands where sugar cane was king...They had to send working types Or indentured servants to North America and slaves to the islands....Australia and Tasmania? Debtors from London jails and prison guards, neither desirable or industrious stock IMHO. Plus Canada had a French English mixture and the U.S. French/English/Spanish and we opened our doors to immigrant's and received rich diversity...Au & Tas? Pretty well closed up, no body of color or with slant eyes was allowed in until only recently at the very end of the 20th century....That sick trash down there is lucky I'm willing to help them with their emotional problems. And the ANZAC? Like most AuTas they talk a good fight but have no ass to back it up....The Turks whipped their ass in WW I and Japan was going to make a colony of white slaves out of them till they made the mistake of attacking Pearl and pissing the U.S. off. So there it is, I have a Vietnam foot note, they were involved there as part of the SEATO pack I believe, Sent their best the SAS----I was not impressed, they stayed in their fort and bad mouthed the USMC...I make fun of the Corps myself but thats OK, their ours and since breaking away from the Navy in the 1950's have become uppity. I stopped at the ANZAC fort a couple of times because it was at the end of my patrol line, here sat these ANZAC Advisor's inside the fort with cases of stubbies pilled around them, Couldn't wait to tell me some Marines had been killed within sight of their Fort walls....I said "Well thats what happens when you patrol...It throws the enemy off balance and tends to piss them off---They were all middle aged and fat around the middle every one of them had three white chevrons and a SAS badge. Unlike us they didn't live with the Vietnamese in a local village, they stayed in their fort----That kind of mentality didn't work against the American Indians of the old west and it didn't cut it in Asia either....You got to get out there and contest the country side...I was so disillusioned with ANZAC that I turned down R&R to Australia preferring to go to Taiwan. The X.O. said "what are you crazy?" You live and fight beside Asians and now your taking your break with Asians? "Yes Sir, I just don't like Australians, they strike me as blowhards." "You and I have not seen a round eyed woman in at least 6 months and you choose Taiwan?" "Unless you are willing to send me to Canada on R&R, I'm willing to take a chance on living six more months then see some real round eyed North American women YES SIR !!!!" Well he didn't think that was too damn funny and stamped my R&R orders for Taiwan without further comment. ~there it is~ those jack wagons down under don't have me fooled. .
Re: what ''shit' ' Now the difference between colony's down under and on this side of the Pacific. Anthropological thesis
Author: Sunny
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 07:38
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 07:38
20 lines
2674 bytes
2674 bytes
"the unknown flailer" <thuythu@iwon.com> wrote in message news:8289d62b-ecea-45e6-afe6-371ae50a92c8@u10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com... <snip rant> I have a Vietnam foot note, they were involved there as part of the SEATO pack I believe, Sent their best the SAS----I was not impressed, they stayed in their fort and bad mouthed the USMC <snip> Your involvement in SVN was .....................? Read some History, instead of inventing your own. As well as SASR we had a Task Force of 6000 Infantry (Rotated 9 Bns each 3 years) and The AATV (Trg Team) Your US Commander gave us the main responsibility for 3 Corps area (look it up on a Map) I was an Infantry Coy CSM with 8 Bn RAR on combat operations in SVN 1969-1970 and worked with a lot of US Army, Navy Engineers, Artillery, and Air Force. Which Australian Units did you get "involved with" to form your "I was not impressed" mantra?
Re: what ''shit' ' Now the difference between colony's down under and on this side of the Pacific. Anthropological thesis
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 16:01
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 16:01
43 lines
4194 bytes
4194 bytes
On Oct 25, 2:38 am, "Sunny" <wombatho...@yahoo.com.au> wrote: > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in messagenews:8289d62b-ecea-45e6-afe6-371ae50a92c8@u10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com... > <snip rant> > I have a Vietnam foot note, they were involved there as part of the > SEATO pack I believe, Sent their best the SAS----I was not impressed, > they stayed in their fort and bad mouthed the USMC > <snip> > > Your involvement in SVN was .....................? > Read some History, instead of inventing your own. > As well as SASR we had a Task Force of 6000 Infantry (Rotated 9 Bns each 3 > years) and The AATV (Trg Team) > Your US Commander gave us the main responsibility for 3 Corps area (look > it up on a Map) > I was an Infantry Coy CSM with 8 Bn RAR on combat operations in SVN > 1969-1970 and worked with a lot of US Army, Navy Engineers, Artillery, and > Air Force. > Which Australian Units did you get "involved with" to form your "I was > not impressed" mantra? Don't need to, I lived history and I know what I saw Same/same last tour 1969 till 1970, with two prior trips---61/62 & 64/65....They were Advisor's to the ARVNS...Old guys. more interested in drinking beer than getting out with indigenous troops and mixing it up with the enemy---I remember thinking geezus it must take a long time to earn a stripe in the ANZAC, These guys are in their 40's and only have 3. One of them had 3 stripes and a crown, he seemed fairly sober & squared away but the others? Lazy bunch of beer swilling bullshitters, wouldn't make a pimple on the sorriest Marines ass. Don't blame them for not wanting to fight, we shouldn't have been there anyway...It wasn't their war, Vietnam was no threat to them. Seems they earned elite badges to swagger around and do nothing. In America you earn one and you have to use that training for other than caging beer. Another thing the majority of you ass holes are Urban not tough out back types. I'll guarantee every one of you with a computer are city people....Kind of like Dallas, Houston or out right big city Yankee's over here wearing boots and a 10 gallon hat pretending to be cowboys, you ain't worth spit. Don't worry though Americans and Canadian forces have Pac Rim Sissy's covered if you are ever attacked. ;-P
Re: what ''shit' ' Now the difference between colony's down under and on this side of the Pacific. Anthropological thesis
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 17:47
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 17:47
30 lines
3610 bytes
3610 bytes
On Oct 25, 2:38 am, "Sunny" <wombatho...@yahoo.com.au> wrote: > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in messagenews:8289d62b-ecea-45e6-afe6-371ae50a92c8@u10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com... > <snip rant> > I have a Vietnam foot note, they were involved there as part of the > SEATO pack I believe, Sent their best the SAS----I was not impressed, > they stayed in their fort and bad mouthed the USMC > <snip> > Which Australian Units did you get "involved with" to form your "I was > not impressed" mantra? I wasn't involved with them, the drunken bums were at the end of my patrol line. Its clear the U.S. unit involved could have been US Army of the Boy Scouts of America for all I know, it happened the month before and seeing the subdued tag on my jungle fatigues said U.S. Navy they thought I'd go "Oh yeah, USMC not worth a shit." and get drunk with them. Not going to happen, I had kilometers to go to reach my outpost and didn't plan on doing it with a hang over. The U.S. forces were trying to clear a LZ outside the ANZAC Fort and tripped off a 105mm shell left as a gift by the enemy. Its clear to me ANZAC couldn't handle their A.O. so the U.S. Commander sent a US Unit down there to patrol it and protect them. The bums never went outside their gate, saying the US Unit med evacuated their own dead and wounded then moved off. Clearly Australian Forces had some old bums just marking time until retirement and they fostered them off on MACV. tsk tsk tsk and now here 40 years later are the Australians showing up again......As what? Tough talking Pedophiles and gay boys on wreck. I say again. ~NOT IMPRESSED~ Let Red China have Australia and Tasmania too, why should we care? ;-P
Re: what ''shit' ' Now if Red China annexe's Australia one Texans opinion ;-)
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 22:32
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 22:32
47 lines
4131 bytes
4131 bytes
On Oct 26, 2:28 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhondaleak...@earthling.net> wrote: > Sunny wrote: > > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in message > >news:e0689486-8a99-4842-9d32-9770627ba2f2@k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com... > > On Oct 25, 2:38 am, "Sunny" <wombatho...@yahoo.com.au> wrote: > >> "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in > >> messagenews:8289d62b-ecea-45e6-afe6-371ae50a92c8@u10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com... > >> <snip rant> > > <snip> > > > BTW when are you going to realise that the clown that claims to be > > Peter Lucas is not him? > > He knows, but he doesn't care if it will enable him to stir some shit. He'd > a good candidate for auk when the lawsuit is over and the FNVW is able to > post again. No lawsuit to it Buggery man down in Australia fabricated Peter Lucas and is suspected of doctoring a phony ANUS agreement between the United States and Australia in hopes of involving the U.S. in a war with China. Since buggery is illegal in Texas, he will be arrested and held on Buggery charges if he ever cross's our state line. Held without bail and tried for producing fake International documents & bother on rec. skydiving by posing as Peter Lucas....We have a special cell block for skizo's like sunny @ Wombat.Au, Bars but no windows or screens, We are now going through Texas penal records, searching for a 300 pound black man with a mix of Chinese blood to be his cell mate....This should fulfill his anal fixation and desire for buggery. Not to mention, avert the war between the United States and Peoples Republic of China he is planning by using this fake ANUS document he claims Australia has saying American troops will be sent to prevent an Invasion of Australia by 10,000,000,000 PLA soldiers. Texas being attached to the U.S. will be dragged into the middle of this Armageddon like war. And for what, to save a bunch of drunk Australians ? So now you have the scoop Yankee momma, put your apron back on and do your house work and quit being a busybody before you are suspected of being a Fifth columnist and enemy of the State, . ;-*
Re: what ''shit' ' Now if Red China annexe's Australia one Texans opinion ;-)
Author: Aussie
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 03:27
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 03:27
25 lines
2756 bytes
2756 bytes
"Sunny" <wombathouse@yahoo.com.au> wrote in news:Yzvxo.492$MF5.248@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com: > > "the unknown flailer" <thuythu@iwon.com> wrote in message > BTW Australia did not have any "Forts" in SVN Sunny....... you're never going to win with that moron "Snuffy". It's a troll of the highest order, *anything* you say, it will counter with its own brand of lies and bullshit just to keep you talking to it. Doing that is the only reason that keeps it alive. I have also taken out the irrelevant crossposting groups. -- Peter Lucas Hobart Tasmania If riding in an airplane is flying, then riding in a boat is swimming..If you want to experience the element, get out of the vehicle !
Re: what ''shit' ' Now the difference between colony's down under and on this side of the Pacific. Anthropological thesis
Author: Spartan613
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 05:43
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 05:43
62 lines
4813 bytes
4813 bytes
"the unknown flailer" <thuythu@iwon.com> wrote in message news:c4f14262-1fc7-4690-83b6-cad4ed57e0f7@l8g2000yql.googlegroups.com... On Oct 26, 1:48 am, "Spartan613" <nos...@buggeroff.com> wrote: > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in > messagenews:8289d62b-ecea-45e6-afe6-371ae50a92c8@u10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com... > On Oct 24, 10:29 pm, the unknown flailer <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote: > > > On Oct 22, 2:25 am, "Sunny" <wombatho...@yahoo.com.au> wrote: > > > > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in > > > messagenews:bed1af5a-0b18-4249-b913-aa703d30b17a@p26g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... > > > > Ahhhhh I'm cumming, you made my month woman and BTW Peters enough of a > > > schemer to set up fake accounts to fool > > > <snip rest of garbage> > > > > ** Are you going through a second childhood, or you just a boofhead ? > > > Dayum I try to be cement good relations between the U.S. & white trash > > like the Tas-maniacs and Au-strange-aliens then they get in a snit. > > 0~;-> > > But thats to be expected, Australia and Tasmania were English prison > colony's unlike the U.S. and Canada where > furs and crops were paramount or the Caribbean Islands where sugar > cane was king...They had to send working types > Or indentured servants to North America and slaves to the > islands....Australia and Tasmania? Debtors from London jails and > prison guards, neither desirable or industrious stock IMHO. Plus > Canada had a French English mixture and the U.S. > French/English/Spanish and we opened our doors to immigrant's and > received rich diversity...Au & Tas? Pretty well closed > up, no body of color or with slant eyes was allowed in until only > recently at the very end of the 20th century....That sick trash down > there is lucky I'm willing to help them with their emotional problems. > And the ANZAC? Like most AuTas they talk a good fight but have no ass > to back it up....The Turks whipped their ass in WW I and Japan was > going to make a colony of white slaves out of them till they made the > mistake of attacking Pearl and pissing the U.S. off. So there it is, > > I have a Vietnam foot note, they were involved there as part of the > SEATO pack I believe, Sent their best the SAS----I was not impressed, > they stayed in their fort > > ************ > > Where was this "fort"? A old French fighting position left over from their colonial rule, looked like it had been created by Hollywood for a Beau Gest movie only smaller like a Chateu. **** Can you be more specific? A super-soldier like you would be able to rattle off the MGRS or Lat-Long for it, surely? -- "God is not on the side of the big battalions, but of those who shoot the best". Voltaire..
Re: what ''shit' ' Now who is Peter Lucas?
Author: Spartan613
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 05:45
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 05:45
31 lines
2881 bytes
2881 bytes
"the unknown flailer" <thuythu@iwon.com> wrote in message news:f5ac4a9f-3a31-47ed-948a-7d0b512e5bf5@a36g2000yqc.googlegroups.com... On Oct 26, 1:48 am, "Spartan613" <nos...@buggeroff.com> wrote: > you. > > -- > "God is not on the side of the big battalions, but of those who shoot the > best". Voltaire.. The cluck that fabricates that Peter Lucas crap is inclined to add tag lines also, makes you look like a suspect I notice you have more than one account also-----tsk tsk tsk. I begin to understand how Australia was dumb enough to sign a ANUS agreement with the United States now. Not enough Prepreation H in the world to cover that mate! ;)P *********** Are you talking to; A. Peter Lucas, B. Me, C. The voices in your head. -- "God is not on the side of the big battalions, but of those who shoot the best". Voltaire..
Re: what ''shit' ' Now if Red China annexe's Australia one Texans opinion ;-)
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 05:50
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 05:50
72 lines
5166 bytes
5166 bytes
On Oct 26, 10:27 pm, Aussie <Aus...@home.upstairs.in.brissie.aus> wrote: > "Sunny" <wombatho...@yahoo.com.au> wrote innews:Yzvxo.492$MF5.248@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com: > > > > > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in message > > BTW Australia did not have any "Forts" in SVN > > Sunny....... you're never going to win with that moron "Snuffy". It's a troll > of the highest order, *anything* you say, it will counter with its own brand > of lies and bullshit just to keep you talking to it. > > Doing that is the only reason that keeps it alive. > > I have also taken out the irrelevant crossposting groups. > > -- > Peter Lucas > Hobart > Tasmania > > If riding in an airplane is flying, then riding in a boat is swimming..If you > want to experience the element, get out of the vehicle ! Hummmm talking to yourself I see. 1 My understanding of a troll is the poster leaves a egg much like a bad smell then disappears to laugh while people freak and carry on about it screaming hollering and bitching. In that case I can't be considered a troll because I put the egg out there and then stay around to scramble it for the dummy's involved. I understand why you were created, Australians are afraid....Its a white mans fear, loss of status quo----non white, non Australians are creating power and resourses...Our status is becoming lower....Going to end up poor second class citizens. You took on the Hindi because they are considered sub human right? Well bub India is becoming a economic powerhouse....You and the other drunken white trash down there might end up as their employee's. No Union, squat to shit, carrying honey buckets for the other than whites <eg> Yet I notice none of you bad mouth China, Australia's biggest danger, afraid are you? Like a mouse in snake territory....shhhh don/t attract their attention----Yet I know you hate them just as bad as you do the Hindu....Fear does strange things to the mind. Like the old saying, there are no atheist in fox holes----You begin to pray to a higher power when in danger, Atheist or not---Man fears death, enslavement and a multitude of other things. Its the things they normally do to people they consider substandard---This is what they fear their self. The worm turning. Hiding behind this alter ego will do you no good-------->China has their eye on you! Your white have round eyes, Talk with a accent, can't speak any of their dialects. So now you are thinking "Well we have a agreement with the Americans to protect us. (((GOT NEWS FOR YOU LOOSER))) Our President is not white ~ !! woo woo you are fucked ;-> Although we have had our problems with them in the past China has embraced Capitalism moderated their views toward the USA and is now is a trade partner......Looking better than the Australians every day, in every way. Ahhhhhhhh can't say the rest of the world is going to miss you or your back wards country and the white trash it breeds either. ;)P
Re: what ''shit' ' Now the difference between colony's down under and on this side of the Pacific. Anthropological thesis
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 06:10
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 06:10
88 lines
5706 bytes
5706 bytes
On Oct 27, 12:43 am, "Spartan613" <nos...@buggeroff.com> wrote: > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in messagenews:c4f14262-1fc7-4690-83b6-cad4ed57e0f7@l8g2000yql.googlegroups.com... > On Oct 26, 1:48 am, "Spartan613" <nos...@buggeroff.com> wrote: > > > > > > > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in > > messagenews:8289d62b-ecea-45e6-afe6-371ae50a92c8@u10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com... > > On Oct 24, 10:29 pm, the unknown flailer <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote: > > > > On Oct 22, 2:25 am, "Sunny" <wombatho...@yahoo.com.au> wrote: > > > > > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in > > > > messagenews:bed1af5a-0b18-4249-b913-aa703d30b17a@p26g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... > > > > > Ahhhhh I'm cumming, you made my month woman and BTW Peters enough of a > > > > schemer to set up fake accounts to fool > > > > <snip rest of garbage> > > > > > ** Are you going through a second childhood, or you just a boofhead ? > > > > Dayum I try to be cement good relations between the U.S. & white trash > > > like the Tas-maniacs and Au-strange-aliens then they get in a snit. > > > 0~;-> > > > But thats to be expected, Australia and Tasmania were English prison > > colony's unlike the U.S. and Canada where > > furs and crops were paramount or the Caribbean Islands where sugar > > cane was king...They had to send working types > > Or indentured servants to North America and slaves to the > > islands....Australia and Tasmania? Debtors from London jails and > > prison guards, neither desirable or industrious stock IMHO. Plus > > Canada had a French English mixture and the U.S. > > French/English/Spanish and we opened our doors to immigrant's and > > received rich diversity...Au & Tas? Pretty well closed > > up, no body of color or with slant eyes was allowed in until only > > recently at the very end of the 20th century....That sick trash down > > there is lucky I'm willing to help them with their emotional problems. > > And the ANZAC? Like most AuTas they talk a good fight but have no ass > > to back it up....The Turks whipped their ass in WW I and Japan was > > going to make a colony of white slaves out of them till they made the > > mistake of attacking Pearl and pissing the U.S. off. So there it is, > > > I have a Vietnam foot note, they were involved there as part of the > > SEATO pack I believe, Sent their best the SAS----I was not impressed, > > they stayed in their fort > > > ************ > > > Where was this "fort"? > > A old French fighting position left over from their colonial rule, > looked like it had been created by Hollywood for a Beau Gest > movie only smaller like a Château. > > **** > > Can you be more specific? > > A super-soldier like you would be able to rattle off the MGRS or Lat-Long > for it, surely? > > -- > "God is not on the side of the big battalions, but of those who shoot the > best". Voltaire..- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - It was not in III Corps, A French style house in a compound with high walls around it carrying ramparts...Only 4 enlisted ANZACS there, middle aged, flabby, balding NCO's ~pitiful~ They had a lot of beer though, cases of it stacked head high all around the room they seemed to prefer as a Mess. Depending on the ARVNS to guard their gate & perimeter U.S, units had to patrol their A.O.. I was not impressed, could have taken it away from them with my boat crews who were basicall fishermen and ex Indo China pirates. If thats your best the ChiCom should be able to take Australia 1 2 3 as easy as that. If you want a job later start learning some Chinese dialects bub is my best advice.
Re: what ''shit' ' Now if Red China annexe's Australia one Texans opinion ;-)
Author: Sunny
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:07
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:07
6 lines
2280 bytes
2280 bytes
"the unknown flailer" <thuythu@iwon.com> wrote in message news:aa38326b-0e96-46b0-86e7-2f3c33f37506@30g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... <snip your bullshit> Talk to a mirror, it may make some sense in what you spruik Out
Re: what ''shit' ' Now the difference between colony's down under and on this side of the Pacific. Anthropological thesis
Author: Sunny
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:16
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:16
97 lines
6073 bytes
6073 bytes
"the unknown flailer" <thuythu@iwon.com> wrote in message news:5c26e3c0-cb2a-4d6d-a17e-4f1397480aa0@t20g2000yqa.googlegroups.com... On Oct 27, 12:43 am, "Spartan613" <nos...@buggeroff.com> wrote: > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in > messagenews:c4f14262-1fc7-4690-83b6-cad4ed57e0f7@l8g2000yql.googlegroups.com... > On Oct 26, 1:48 am, "Spartan613" <nos...@buggeroff.com> wrote: > > > > > > > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in > > messagenews:8289d62b-ecea-45e6-afe6-371ae50a92c8@u10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com... > > On Oct 24, 10:29 pm, the unknown flailer <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote: > > > > On Oct 22, 2:25 am, "Sunny" <wombatho...@yahoo.com.au> wrote: > > > > > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in > > > > messagenews:bed1af5a-0b18-4249-b913-aa703d30b17a@p26g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... > > > > > Ahhhhh I'm cumming, you made my month woman and BTW Peters enough > > > > of a > > > > schemer to set up fake accounts to fool > > > > <snip rest of garbage> > > > > > ** Are you going through a second childhood, or you just a > > > > boofhead ? > > > > Dayum I try to be cement good relations between the U.S. & white > > > trash > > > like the Tas-maniacs and Au-strange-aliens then they get in a snit. > > > 0~;-> > > > But thats to be expected, Australia and Tasmania were English prison > > colony's unlike the U.S. and Canada where > > furs and crops were paramount or the Caribbean Islands where sugar > > cane was king...They had to send working types > > Or indentured servants to North America and slaves to the > > islands....Australia and Tasmania? Debtors from London jails and > > prison guards, neither desirable or industrious stock IMHO. Plus > > Canada had a French English mixture and the U.S. > > French/English/Spanish and we opened our doors to immigrant's and > > received rich diversity...Au & Tas? Pretty well closed > > up, no body of color or with slant eyes was allowed in until only > > recently at the very end of the 20th century....That sick trash down > > there is lucky I'm willing to help them with their emotional problems. > > And the ANZAC? Like most AuTas they talk a good fight but have no ass > > to back it up....The Turks whipped their ass in WW I and Japan was > > going to make a colony of white slaves out of them till they made the > > mistake of attacking Pearl and pissing the U.S. off. So there it is, > > > I have a Vietnam foot note, they were involved there as part of the > > SEATO pack I believe, Sent their best the SAS----I was not impressed, > > they stayed in their fort > > > ************ > > > Where was this "fort"? > > A old French fighting position left over from their colonial rule, > looked like it had been created by Hollywood for a Beau Gest > movie only smaller like a Ch�teau. > > **** > > Can you be more specific? > > A super-soldier like you would be able to rattle off the MGRS or > Lat-Long > for it, surely? > > -- > "God is not on the side of the big battalions, but of those who shoot > the > best". Voltaire..- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - It was not in III Corps, A French style house in a compound with high walls around it carrying ramparts...Only 4 enlisted ANZACS there, middle aged, flabby, balding NCO's ~pitiful~ ********************************** If they were AATTV (Australian Army Trg Team Vietnam they were not NCOs they were Warrant Officers Class 2 (The only NCOs were attached to MATT (Teams) and were based at major ARVN Trg establishments They had a lot of beer though, cases of it ****************************************8 I swapped beer with the US Seabee Unit stationed in Baria, two cases of Budweiser for one case of Aussie VB. (My Coy Comd wanted our troops to drink lower alcohol beer) BTW We never had re-supplies that included beer while on OPs, not like the US Infantry and Cav Units we worked with.
Re: what ''shit' ' Now if Red China annexe's Australia one Texans opinion ;-)
Author: Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 13:45
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 13:45
27 lines
2836 bytes
2836 bytes
the unknown flailer wrote: > On Oct 26, 2:28 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" > <rhondaleak...@earthling.net> wrote: >> Sunny wrote: >>> "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in message >>> news:e0689486-8a99-4842-9d32-9770627ba2f2@k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com... >>> On Oct 25, 2:38 am, "Sunny" <wombatho...@yahoo.com.au> wrote: >>>> "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in >>>> messagenews:8289d62b-ecea-45e6-afe6-371ae50a92c8@u10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com... >>>> <snip rant> >> >> <snip> >> >>> BTW when are you going to realise that the clown that claims to be >>> Peter Lucas is not him? >> >> He knows, but he doesn't care if it will enable him to stir some >> shit. He'd a good candidate for auk when the lawsuit is over and the >> FNVW is able to post again. > > No lawsuit to it You have no idea what I'm talking about, so you confabulate some weird nonsense to make you seem (to yourself only) that you do. You should be aware, however, that some of your remarks border on actionable libel, and if you get sued, you'll have no one to blame but yourself.
Re: what ''shit' ' Now the difference between colony's down under and on this side of the Pacific. Anthropological thesis
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 16:43
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 16:43
148 lines
9091 bytes
9091 bytes
On Oct 27, 2:16 am, "Sunny" <wombatho...@yahoo.com.au> wrote: > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in messagenews:5c26e3c0-cb2a-4d6d-a17e-4f1397480aa0@t20g2000yqa.googlegroups.com... > On Oct 27, 12:43 am, "Spartan613" <nos...@buggeroff.com> wrote: > > > > > > > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in > > messagenews:c4f14262-1fc7-4690-83b6-cad4ed57e0f7@l8g2000yql.googlegroups.com... > > On Oct 26, 1:48 am, "Spartan613" <nos...@buggeroff.com> wrote: > > > > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in > > > messagenews:8289d62b-ecea-45e6-afe6-371ae50a92c8@u10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com... > > > On Oct 24, 10:29 pm, the unknown flailer <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote: > > > > > On Oct 22, 2:25 am, "Sunny" <wombatho...@yahoo.com.au> wrote: > > > > > > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in > > > > > messagenews:bed1af5a-0b18-4249-b913-aa703d30b17a@p26g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... > > > > > > Ahhhhh I'm cumming, you made my month woman and BTW Peters enough > > > > > of a > > > > > schemer to set up fake accounts to fool > > > > > <snip rest of garbage> > > > > > > ** Are you going through a second childhood, or you just a > > > > > boofhead ? > > > > > Dayum I try to be cement good relations between the U.S. & white > > > > trash > > > > like the Tas-maniacs and Au-strange-aliens then they get in a snit. > > > > 0~;-> > > > > But thats to be expected, Australia and Tasmania were English prison > > > colony's unlike the U.S. and Canada where > > > furs and crops were paramount or the Caribbean Islands where sugar > > > cane was king...They had to send working types > > > Or indentured servants to North America and slaves to the > > > islands....Australia and Tasmania? Debtors from London jails and > > > prison guards, neither desirable or industrious stock IMHO. Plus > > > Canada had a French English mixture and the U.S. > > > French/English/Spanish and we opened our doors to immigrant's and > > > received rich diversity...Au & Tas? Pretty well closed > > > up, no body of color or with slant eyes was allowed in until only > > > recently at the very end of the 20th century....That sick trash down > > > there is lucky I'm willing to help them with their emotional problems. > > > And the ANZAC? Like most AuTas they talk a good fight but have no ass > > > to back it up....The Turks whipped their ass in WW I and Japan was > > > going to make a colony of white slaves out of them till they made the > > > mistake of attacking Pearl and pissing the U.S. off. So there it is, > > > > I have a Vietnam foot note, they were involved there as part of the > > > SEATO pack I believe, Sent their best the SAS----I was not impressed, > > > they stayed in their fort > > > > ************ > > > > Where was this "fort"? > > > A old French fighting position left over from their colonial rule, > > looked like it had been created by Hollywood for a Beau Gest > > movie only smaller like a Château. > > > **** > > > Can you be more specific? > > > A super-soldier like you would be able to rattle off the MGRS or > > Lat-Long > > for it, surely? > > > -- > > "God is not on the side of the big battalions, but of those who shoot > > the > > best". Voltaire..- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > It was not in III Corps, A French style house in a compound with high > walls around it carrying ramparts...Only 4 > enlisted ANZACS there, middle aged, flabby, balding NCO's ~pitiful~ > > ********************************** > If they were AATTV (Australian Army Trg Team Vietnam they were not NCOs > they were Warrant Officers Class 2 > (The only NCOs were attached to MATT (Teams) and were based at major ARVN > Trg establishments > > They had a lot of beer though, cases of it > > ****************************************8 > I swapped beer with the US Seabee Unit stationed in Baria, two cases of > Budweiser for one case of Aussie VB. > (My Coy Comd wanted our troops to drink lower alcohol beer) > BTW We never had re-supplies that included beer while on OPs, not like the > US Infantry and Cav Units we worked with.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Booze? We had plenty, every Co Van had a ration card. 6 fifths and so many cases of beer and cokes a month. Had to go into Da Nang to get it at the PX. Always a shot up boat that needed to go in or one that needed a engine replaced. We took turns, one team member took all 4 ration cards and bought the supply. Not being big drinkers, we used most of it in trade. Mainly using Air Cav helicopters like taxi's. A bottle of Scotch could get front door service and a lift just about anywhere. We left some with our SK (Supply NCO) at HQ to grease the supply line between Branch's. He managed to get us a E model M60 for the bow of our primary scout boat and cases of LURP rations on demand, which was a good deal for all of us but especially our LT. The guy was from a rich Virginia family....Ivy league school (Spoiled rotten) Couldn't eat bush tucker or local food without getting sick and of course C rations were heavy and tended to constipate-----I felt sorry for the poor thing and often took his turn eating with the Vietnamese Officers--They had a wicked sense of humor and tried to feed him dog parts, fish heads, monkey brains, goat eyeballs, chicken and duck feet and various animal guts as were their custom...Any thing they considered a delicacy was hand fed to a honored guest to make sure he got some, plenty of Nuc mom on everything of course. hahahahahaha I loved watching his expression--- To save face, he had to get it down ~but later~, Talk about projectile vomit. The boy could slump against one wall and hit the opposite wall in the team room with vomit. We had were tight little field teams, we protected him as much as we could but he had a weak constitution.......Could have been at sea eating in the Ward room on fine China being waited on hand and foot by Stewards Mates but here he was with a bunch of ruffians trying to tough it out----You had to respect that, even though he was doing it for combat command showing in his service records, helping with promotion---The Navy was tough on Officers at promotion time---They get passed over twice and they were out----Cut down the dead wood thats for sure but all you needed was one asshole on the review board that didn't like you and you got passed over. Of course enlisted ranks were much easier (stay out of the brig) get recommended for advancement, pass the written when it came around. Shit I was E-7 or CPO within 9 years A wonderful little war in my opinion-----I just didn't like killing....Since I respected the NVA's determination, toughness and overall tenacity that made it suck even more. So I just got out when my terms of service were up and became a man of peace as you can probably tell 0~;->
Re: what ''shit' ' Now if Red China annexe's Australia one Texans opinion ;-) NOW RL flex's the muscle between her ears
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 17:39
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 17:39
56 lines
4730 bytes
4730 bytes
On Oct 27, 8:45 am, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhondaleak...@earthling.net> wrote: > the unknown flailer wrote: > > On Oct 26, 2:28 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" > > <rhondaleak...@earthling.net> wrote: > >> Sunny wrote: > >>> "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in message > >>>news:e0689486-8a99-4842-9d32-9770627ba2f2@k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com... > >>> On Oct 25, 2:38 am, "Sunny" <wombatho...@yahoo.com.au> wrote: > >>>> "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in > >>>> messagenews:8289d62b-ecea-45e6-afe6-371ae50a92c8@u10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com... > >>>> <snip rant> > > >> <snip> > > >>> BTW when are you going to realise that the clown that claims to be > >>> Peter Lucas is not him? > > >> He knows, but he doesn't care if it will enable him to stir some > >> shit. He'd a good candidate for auk when the lawsuit is over and the > >> FNVW is able to post again. > > > No lawsuit to it > > You have no idea what I'm talking about, so you confabulate some weird > nonsense to make you seem (to yourself only) that you do. > > You should be aware, however, that some of your remarks border on actionable > libel, and if you get sued, you'll have no one to blame but yourself.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Its clear you are a Peter Lucas groupie, one of these perverted Australians is hiding behind the Peter Lucas mask. And the creator of the persona is a passive aggressive, they are easy to crack.There is a method to my madness----I have two persons of interest in the investigation. I see you too are fond of using other peoples quotes as tag lines, its a form of plagiarism you know...Not for money but from lack of talent or original thought on the thief's part. Sue? Let them try it from across the International date line, or perhaps come here----Texas really will arrest some of them for buggery and the other perverted fetish's they display. Not to mention First Amendment rights protect a lot of my views. I see you posting on the legal group and also the fat groups----Got a problem hauling your big caboose around sweetie? <grin> These Ozzies also take their hatred of Indians and and other indigenous peoples and the Peter Lucas persona to other groups. Sooooo jump on your broom and fly your bitchy self away RL DZ style politics and fear tactics just don't work on me, never did on the DZ, won't here. Oh and watch stealing talented thinkers quotes. It doesn't make you look intelligent, just immature with no original thought of your own!. The advice as always is free. 0~;-*
Re: what ''shit' ' Now if Red China annexe's Australia one Texans opinion ;-)
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:43
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:43
12 lines
2645 bytes
2645 bytes
On Oct 27, 2:07 am, "Sunny" <wombatho...@yahoo.com.au> wrote: > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in messagenews:aa38326b-0e96-46b0-86e7-2f3c33f37506@30g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... > <snip your bullshit> > Talk to a mirror, it may make some sense in what you spruik > Out As the song goes "I feel pretty", no need to look in a mirror and only intellectuals would understand my reasoning and droll humor.Intellectuals seem to be in short supply down under. But as long as it pisses the self important and/or trashy personality's off it works for me. 0~;-)
Re: what ''shit' ' Now if Red China annexe's Australia one Texans opinion ;-)
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:59
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:59
49 lines
4196 bytes
4196 bytes
On Oct 27, 8:45 am, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhondaleak...@earthling.net> wrote: > the unknown flailer wrote: > > On Oct 26, 2:28 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" > > <rhondaleak...@earthling.net> wrote: > >> Sunny wrote: > >>> "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in message > >>>news:e0689486-8a99-4842-9d32-9770627ba2f2@k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com... > >>> On Oct 25, 2:38 am, "Sunny" <wombatho...@yahoo.com.au> wrote: > >>>> "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in > >>>> messagenews:8289d62b-ecea-45e6-afe6-371ae50a92c8@u10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com... > >>>> <snip rant> > > >> <snip> > > >>> BTW when are you going to realise that the clown that claims to be > >>> Peter Lucas is not him? > > >> He knows, but he doesn't care if it will enable him to stir some > >> shit. He'd a good candidate for auk when the lawsuit is over and the > >> FNVW is able to post again. > > > No lawsuit to it > > You have no idea what I'm talking about, so you confabulate some weird > nonsense to make you seem (to yourself only) that you do. > > You should be aware, however, that some of your remarks border on actionable > libel, and if you get sued, you'll have no one to blame but yourself.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Dream on woman, can't squeeze blood from a turnip and hurt feelings have no place in the law. A lot of what I say is covered by free speech. Ambulance chasers might take a case for a fee but you and your Peter Lucas fan club would be bled dry....If the lower court didn't throw it out as a nuisance case, Appeals court would chunk any judgment on the First Amendment alone. Then the counter suit for legal fee's. And some crude Australian from across the pond wants American justice? Bring the bank whanker. tsk tsk tsk go back to watching the soap opera's, Divorce court and Judge Judy woman....In the real world your dreams of grandeur & profit aspirations don't fly. You young people are really show your naiveté. A total lack of good sense, say are you now or have you ever been a blond? ROFL ;)P
Re: what ''shit' ' Now RED ALERT AUSTRALIA ;-)
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 19:33
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 19:33
16 lines
2938 bytes
2938 bytes
On Oct 27, 2:07 am, "Sunny" <-----my main straight man ;-) snip his injured friends of America spiel Whoa bub, get on the horn to Krispis and the other whankers......Our Secretary of State is headed for China for talks. Is it to protect our Friend Australia? Dunno, Foreign leaders in the Middle East and Europe call her the bag lady because of her matronly appearance and dress but don't be fooled she is a tough minded old girl. Might speak up for yawl but then again she might trade you off to get Favored trading partner status for the U.S. I know my buddy Sunny is thinking "No worry mate, we sent troops to Vietnam and support the US Military effort in other ways." I myself being a old Veteran thank your country for that gesture. But this is a female....They tend to have a "What have you done for us lately" attitude.....I pray for you my drunken brothers, may God be merciful 0~;-*
Re: what ''shit' ' Now if Red China annexe's Australia one Texans opinion ;-)
Author: Aussie
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 21:09
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 21:09
32 lines
2879 bytes
2879 bytes
"Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> wrote in news:8iqp96F23qU1@mid.individual.net: > the unknown flailer wrote: > > You have no idea what I'm talking about, so you confabulate some weird > nonsense to make you seem (to yourself only) that you do. > > You should be aware, however, that some of your remarks border on > actionable libel, and if you get sued, you'll have no one to blame but > yourself. > > You can't get blood from a stone..... and you can just tell by the bullshit it comes out with that the major asset it has in its life is its computer and internet access. I really don't know why people continue to talk to it. -- Peter Lucas Hobart Tasmania If riding in an airplane is flying, then riding in a boat is swimming..If you want to experience the element, get out of the vehicle !
Re: what ''shit' ' Now if Red China annexe's Australia one Texans opinion ;-)
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 22:59
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 22:59
36 lines
3821 bytes
3821 bytes
On Oct 27, 4:09 pm, Aussie <Aus...@home.upstairs.in.brissie.aus> wrote: > "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhondaleak...@earthling.net> wrote innews:8iqp96F23qU1@mid.individual.net: > > the unknown flailer wrote: > > > You have no idea what I'm talking about, so you confabulate some weird > > nonsense to make you seem (to yourself only) that you do. > > > You should be aware, however, that some of your remarks border on > > actionable libel, and if you get sued, you'll have no one to blame but > > yourself. > > You can't get blood from a stone..... and you can just tell by the bullshit > it comes out with that the major asset it has in its life is its computer and > internet access. > > I really don't know why people continue to talk to it. > > -- Its like getting drunk and doing Jackass things, you know midget throwing....Jumping over the Bon Fire, trading punches, lighting farts etc etc etc....I don't expect a woman to understand----- They got emotions, feelings and shit like that. Besides it gives me a chance to hoorah the Aussies about Red China and give them something to think about besides how much beer is left and who's getting the next one.. Peter is something we have in common (dumb shit) If our rough talk offends you go back to the kitchen or go iron and stay out of it, Just don't open and read it. You will never understand our dumb stuff. And no one is getting sued over Political views, local or International in the state of Texas. The Peter creator could do time in Texas for pedophile talk and a few other things if he was ever caught. Give up and go away. I haven't had to do what a woman told me or watched what I said since my momma died last century. ;)P
Re: what ''shit' ' Now if Red China annexe's Australia one Texans opinion ;-)
Author: Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 02:19
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 02:19
29 lines
2639 bytes
2639 bytes
Aussie wrote: > "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> wrote in > news:8iqp96F23qU1@mid.individual.net: > >> the unknown flailer wrote: > >> >> You have no idea what I'm talking about, so you confabulate some >> weird nonsense to make you seem (to yourself only) that you do. >> >> You should be aware, however, that some of your remarks border on >> actionable libel, and if you get sued, you'll have no one to blame >> but yourself. >> >> > > > > You can't get blood from a stone..... and you can just tell by the > bullshit it comes out with that the major asset it has in its life is > its computer and internet access. Some states have criminal libel laws. http://volokh.com/2010/06/08/about-200-criminal-libelslander-convictions-in-virginia-from-2001-to-2008/ > I really don't know why people continue to talk to it. I want to gag it.
Re: what ''shit' ' Now the difference between colony's down under and on this side of the Pacific. Anthropological thesis
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 03:05
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 03:05
23 lines
3102 bytes
3102 bytes
On Oct 26, 1:54 am, "Spartan613" <nos...@buggeroff.com> wrote: >thuythu working the muts > *I say again. ~NOT IMPRESSED~ Let Red China have Australia and > *Tasmania too, why should we care? ;-P > > You'd care fuckin' heaps if the Commies get their hands on our mountains of > uranium. > > Fuckwit. > I love this guy, he's closer to the PRC than Texas is, no chance of a ChiCom cruiser, missile boat and/or troop transports heaving to of the Texas coast----If China needs Nuclear power let them have it, can't do any worse job of it or be more careless than the Australian Government was...Maybe they can send a delegation over to help yawl keep from radiating Kangaroo's & Sheep herders---NOK is the one to beware of, they have missiles that reach Australia and are quite crazy. These stinking Americans and Australians are Allies yes? Well we can't strike the U.S. so lets pop one on Australia just to show the Capitalist pigs in America. Thing to do Spartan is immigrate west where they can't reach you or else build a fall out shelter in your back yard! Bwooooooo ha ha ha ;)P
Re: what ''shit' ' Now if Red China annexe's Australia one Texans opinion ;-)
Author: Aussie
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 03:11
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 03:11
56 lines
3533 bytes
3533 bytes
"Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> wrote in news:8is4ufF1u7U1@mid.individual.net: > Aussie wrote: >> "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> wrote in >> news:8iqp96F23qU1@mid.individual.net: >> >>> the unknown flailer wrote: >> >>> >>> You have no idea what I'm talking about, so you confabulate some >>> weird nonsense to make you seem (to yourself only) that you do. >>> >>> You should be aware, however, that some of your remarks border on >>> actionable libel, and if you get sued, you'll have no one to blame >>> but yourself. >>> >>> >> >> >> >> You can't get blood from a stone..... and you can just tell by the >> bullshit it comes out with that the major asset it has in its life is >> its computer and internet access. > > Some states have criminal libel laws. > > http://volokh.com/2010/06/08/about-200-criminal-libelslander- convictions- > in-virginia-from-2001-to-2008/ Unfortunately, shit-4-brains lives in Texass, IIRC. > >> I really don't know why people continue to talk to it. > > I want to gag it. > The best way to gag it, is killfile it and never 'talk' to it again. Its not going to stop its puerile shit as long as it has an "audience" to play to. -- Peter Lucas Hobart Tasmania If riding in an airplane is flying, then riding in a boat is swimming..If you want to experience the element, get out of the vehicle !
Re: what ''shit' ' Now if Red China annexe's Australia one Texans opinion ;-)
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 03:17
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 03:17
49 lines
3398 bytes
3398 bytes
On Oct 27, 10:11 pm, Aussie <Aus...@home.upstairs.in.brissie.aus> wrote: > "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhondaleak...@earthling.net> wrote innews:8is4ufF1u7U1@mid.individual.net: > > > > > > > > > Aussie wrote: > >> "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhondaleak...@earthling.net> wrote in > >>news:8iqp96F23qU1@mid.individual.net: > > >>> the unknown flailer wrote: > > >>> You have no idea what I'm talking about, so you confabulate some > >>> weird nonsense to make you seem (to yourself only) that you do. > > >>> You should be aware, however, that some of your remarks border on > >>> actionable libel, and if you get sued, you'll have no one to blame > >>> but yourself. > > >> You can't get blood from a stone..... and you can just tell by the > >> bullshit it comes out with that the major asset it has in its life is > >> its computer and internet access. > > > Some states have criminal libel laws. > > >http://volokh.com/2010/06/08/about-200-criminal-libelslander- > convictions- > > in-virginia-from-2001-to-2008/ > > Unfortunately, shit-4-brains lives in Texass, IIRC. > > > > >> I really don't know why people continue to talk to it. > > > I want to gag it. > > The best way to gag it, is killfile it and never 'talk' to it again. > - Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Gee I think she loves me ;-)
Re: what ''shit' ' Now if Red China annexe's Australia one Texans opinion ;-)
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 03:22
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 03:22
30 lines
3106 bytes
3106 bytes
On Oct 27, 9:19 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhondaleak...@earthling.net> wrote: > Aussie wrote: > > "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhondaleak...@earthling.net> wrote in > >news:8iqp96F23qU1@mid.individual.net: > > >> the unknown flailer wrote: > > >> You have no idea what I'm talking about, so you confabulate some > >> weird nonsense to make you seem (to yourself only) that you do. > > >> You should be aware, however, that some of your remarks border on > >> actionable libel, and if you get sued, you'll have no one to blame > >> but yourself. > > > You can't get blood from a stone..... and you can just tell by the > > bullshit it comes out with that the major asset it has in its life is > > its computer and internet access. > > Some states have criminal libel laws. > > http://volokh.com/2010/06/08/about-200-criminal-libelslander-convicti... > > > I really don't know why people continue to talk to it. > > I want to gag it.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Take a pill woman ~ smootchie bootchie
Re: what ''shit' ' Now the difference between colony's down under and on this side of the Pacific. Anthropological thesis
Author: Spartan613
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 08:36
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 08:36
107 lines
6481 bytes
6481 bytes
"the unknown flailer" <thuythu@iwon.com> wrote in message news:5c26e3c0-cb2a-4d6d-a17e-4f1397480aa0@t20g2000yqa.googlegroups.com... On Oct 27, 12:43 am, "Spartan613" <nos...@buggeroff.com> wrote: > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in > messagenews:c4f14262-1fc7-4690-83b6-cad4ed57e0f7@l8g2000yql.googlegroups.com... > On Oct 26, 1:48 am, "Spartan613" <nos...@buggeroff.com> wrote: > > > > > > > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in > > messagenews:8289d62b-ecea-45e6-afe6-371ae50a92c8@u10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com... > > On Oct 24, 10:29 pm, the unknown flailer <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote: > > > > On Oct 22, 2:25 am, "Sunny" <wombatho...@yahoo.com.au> wrote: > > > > > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in > > > > messagenews:bed1af5a-0b18-4249-b913-aa703d30b17a@p26g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... > > > > > Ahhhhh I'm cumming, you made my month woman and BTW Peters enough of > > > > a > > > > schemer to set up fake accounts to fool > > > > <snip rest of garbage> > > > > > ** Are you going through a second childhood, or you just a boofhead > > > > ? > > > > Dayum I try to be cement good relations between the U.S. & white trash > > > like the Tas-maniacs and Au-strange-aliens then they get in a snit. > > > 0~;-> > > > But thats to be expected, Australia and Tasmania were English prison > > colony's unlike the U.S. and Canada where > > furs and crops were paramount or the Caribbean Islands where sugar > > cane was king...They had to send working types > > Or indentured servants to North America and slaves to the > > islands....Australia and Tasmania? Debtors from London jails and > > prison guards, neither desirable or industrious stock IMHO. Plus > > Canada had a French English mixture and the U.S. > > French/English/Spanish and we opened our doors to immigrant's and > > received rich diversity...Au & Tas? Pretty well closed > > up, no body of color or with slant eyes was allowed in until only > > recently at the very end of the 20th century....That sick trash down > > there is lucky I'm willing to help them with their emotional problems. > > And the ANZAC? Like most AuTas they talk a good fight but have no ass > > to back it up....The Turks whipped their ass in WW I and Japan was > > going to make a colony of white slaves out of them till they made the > > mistake of attacking Pearl and pissing the U.S. off. So there it is, > > > I have a Vietnam foot note, they were involved there as part of the > > SEATO pack I believe, Sent their best the SAS----I was not impressed, > > they stayed in their fort > > > ************ > > > Where was this "fort"? > > A old French fighting position left over from their colonial rule, > looked like it had been created by Hollywood for a Beau Gest > movie only smaller like a Ch�teau. > > **** > > Can you be more specific? > > A super-soldier like you would be able to rattle off the MGRS or Lat-Long > for it, surely? > > -- > "God is not on the side of the big battalions, but of those who shoot the > best". Voltaire..- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - It was not in III Corps, A French style house in a compound with high walls around it carrying ramparts...Only 4 enlisted ANZACS there, middle aged, flabby, balding NCO's ~pitiful~ They had a lot of beer though, cases of it stacked head high all around the room they seemed to prefer as a Mess. Depending on the ARVNS to guard their gate & perimeter U.S, units had to patrol their A.O.. I was not impressed, could have taken it away from them with my boat crews who were basicall fishermen and ex Indo China pirates. If thats your best the ChiCom should be able to take Australia 1 2 3 as easy as that. If you want a job later start learning some Chinese dialects bub is my best advice. ********* Dumb cunt, aren't you? I asked you where the place was, and you tell me where it wasn't. You then proceed to tell me about who was living there. Another question I didn't ask and have no interest in. So not only are you as dumb as dog-shit, you're in all likelihood a liar as well. Now, what are you? (Hint: look up the top there). -- "God is not on the side of the big battalions, but of those who shoot the best". Voltaire..
Re: what ''shit' ' Now if Red China annexe's Australia one Texans opinion ;-)
Author: Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 12:41
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 12:41
55 lines
3415 bytes
3415 bytes
Aussie wrote: > "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> wrote in > news:8is4ufF1u7U1@mid.individual.net: > >> Aussie wrote: >>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> wrote in >>> news:8iqp96F23qU1@mid.individual.net: >>> >>>> the unknown flailer wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> You have no idea what I'm talking about, so you confabulate some >>>> weird nonsense to make you seem (to yourself only) that you do. >>>> >>>> You should be aware, however, that some of your remarks border on >>>> actionable libel, and if you get sued, you'll have no one to blame >>>> but yourself. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> You can't get blood from a stone..... and you can just tell by the >>> bullshit it comes out with that the major asset it has in its life >>> is its computer and internet access. >> >> Some states have criminal libel laws. >> >> http://volokh.com/2010/06/08/about-200-criminal-libelslander- >> convictions- in-virginia-from-2001-to-2008/ > > > > Unfortunately, shit-4-brains lives in Texass, IIRC. > > >> >>> I really don't know why people continue to talk to it. >> >> I want to gag it. >> > > > The best way to gag it, is killfile it and never 'talk' to it again. That won't happen, actually. Several of us have made that suggestion in the past. There was a guy in sci.space.history who was killfiled en masse, so he posted and replied to himself. Snuffy is just as crazy as he was. > Its not going to stop its puerile shit as long as it has an > "audience" to play to. No, it's just not going to stop, period.
Re: what ''shit' ' Now the difference between colony's down under and on this side of the Pacific. Anthropological thesis
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 12:55
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 12:55
129 lines
7261 bytes
7261 bytes
On Oct 28, 3:36 am, "Spartan613" <nos...@buggeroff.com> wrote: > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in messagenews:5c26e3c0-cb2a-4d6d-a17e-4f1397480aa0@t20g2000yqa.googlegroups.com... > On Oct 27, 12:43 am, "Spartan613" <nos...@buggeroff.com> wrote: > > > > > > > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in > > messagenews:c4f14262-1fc7-4690-83b6-cad4ed57e0f7@l8g2000yql.googlegroups.com... > > On Oct 26, 1:48 am, "Spartan613" <nos...@buggeroff.com> wrote: > > > > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in > > > messagenews:8289d62b-ecea-45e6-afe6-371ae50a92c8@u10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com... > > > On Oct 24, 10:29 pm, the unknown flailer <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote: > > > > > On Oct 22, 2:25 am, "Sunny" <wombatho...@yahoo.com.au> wrote: > > > > > > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in > > > > > messagenews:bed1af5a-0b18-4249-b913-aa703d30b17a@p26g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... > > > > > > Ahhhhh I'm cumming, you made my month woman and BTW Peters enough of > > > > > a > > > > > schemer to set up fake accounts to fool > > > > > <snip rest of garbage> > > > > > > ** Are you going through a second childhood, or you just a boofhead > > > > > ? > > > > > Dayum I try to be cement good relations between the U.S. & white trash > > > > like the Tas-maniacs and Au-strange-aliens then they get in a snit. > > > > 0~;-> > > > > But thats to be expected, Australia and Tasmania were English prison > > > colony's unlike the U.S. and Canada where > > > furs and crops were paramount or the Caribbean Islands where sugar > > > cane was king...They had to send working types > > > Or indentured servants to North America and slaves to the > > > islands....Australia and Tasmania? Debtors from London jails and > > > prison guards, neither desirable or industrious stock IMHO. Plus > > > Canada had a French English mixture and the U.S. > > > French/English/Spanish and we opened our doors to immigrant's and > > > received rich diversity...Au & Tas? Pretty well closed > > > up, no body of color or with slant eyes was allowed in until only > > > recently at the very end of the 20th century....That sick trash down > > > there is lucky I'm willing to help them with their emotional problems. > > > And the ANZAC? Like most AuTas they talk a good fight but have no ass > > > to back it up....The Turks whipped their ass in WW I and Japan was > > > going to make a colony of white slaves out of them till they made the > > > mistake of attacking Pearl and pissing the U.S. off. So there it is, > > > > I have a Vietnam foot note, they were involved there as part of the > > > SEATO pack I believe, Sent their best the SAS----I was not impressed, > > > they stayed in their fort > > > > ************ > > > > Where was this "fort"? > > > A old French fighting position left over from their colonial rule, > > looked like it had been created by Hollywood for a Beau Gest > > movie only smaller like a Château. > > > **** > > > Can you be more specific? > > > A super-soldier like you would be able to rattle off the MGRS or Lat-Long > > for it, surely? > > > -- > > "God is not on the side of the big battalions, but of those who shoot the > > best". Voltaire..- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > It was not in III Corps, A French style house in a compound with high > walls around it carrying ramparts...Only 4 > enlisted ANZACS there, middle aged, flabby, balding NCO's ~pitiful~ > They had a lot of beer though, cases of it > stacked head high all around the room they seemed to prefer as a Mess. > Depending on the ARVNS to guard > their gate & perimeter U.S, units had to patrol their A.O.. I was not > impressed, could have taken it away from them with my boat crews who > were basically fishermen and ex Indo China pirates. If thats your best > the ChiCom should be able to take Australia 1 2 3 as easy as that. If > you want a job later start learning some Chinese dialects bub is my > best advice. > > ********* > > Dumb cunt, aren't you? > > I asked you where the place was, and you tell me where it wasn't. > > You then proceed to tell me about who was living there. Another question I > didn't ask and have no interest in. > > So not only are you as dumb as dog-shit, you're in all likelihood a liar as > well. > > Now, what are you? > > (Hint: look up the top there). > > - Show quoted text - I was there, you apparently weren't.....Australia didn't have a big presence, Thank God drunk as they were. Setting around their compound shit faced before noon....No wonder the old bastards didn't get outside the compound much. Ah well the war was lost---A few ANZAC troops could make no difference anyway drunk or otherwise. Now yawl expect us to keep China out of Australia? Lots of luck. Don't even know where all the ANZAC presence was, III Corps one of you said. Bzzzt wrong but I'm sure where ever the rest of ANZAC was they were drunk and stumbling around. Just another burden for some American fighting man to carry. .;-P
Re: what ''shit' ' Now who is Peter Lucas?
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:34
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:34
44 lines
3736 bytes
3736 bytes
On Oct 27, 12:45 am, "Spartan613" <nos...@buggeroff.com> wrote: > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in messagenews:f5ac4a9f-3a31-47ed-948a-7d0b512e5bf5@a36g2000yqc.googlegroups.com... > On Oct 26, 1:48 am, "Spartan613" <nos...@buggeroff.com> wrote: > > > you. > > > -- > > "God is not on the side of the big battalions, but of those who shoot the > > best". Voltaire.. > > The cluck that fabricates that Peter Lucas crap is inclined to add tag > lines also, makes you look like a suspect > I notice you have more than one account also-----tsk tsk tsk. I begin > to understand how Australia was dumb enough > to sign a ANUS agreement with the United States now. Not enough > Preparation H in the world to cover that mate! ;)P > > *********** > > Are you talking to; > > A. Peter Lucas, > > B. Me, > > C. The voices in your head. > > -- Who cares as long as I have some Australian cornered and crying. And about that fall out shelter you need in your back yard, that will only work for a NOK missile attack. The NOK don't have the resources for a mass Amphibious landing or Air assault. Wouldn't do it anyway because the American and South Korean Army's are setting right on the 38th parallel, they need the troops at home. If its the ChiCom coming the bomb shelter is no good because they are going to send troops in to stick a bayonet up your backside and move you along to the re education camp to learn the new form of Government in Canberra....I'll be setting in my Rocking Chair out on the front porch here in Texas with my 30/30 leaning against the rail, a drink of some kind in my hand--Thinking of you all....Gee we aught to go down there and save those sissy's but I got to watch the still pressure and guard the garden against varmints! ;-) YeeeeeeHA
Re: what ''shit' ' Now if Red China annexe's Australia one Texans opinion ;-) & RL's time of the month
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:44
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:44
47 lines
3718 bytes
3718 bytes
On Oct 27, 8:45 am, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhondaleak...@earthling.net> wrote: > the unknown flailer wrote: > > On Oct 26, 2:28 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" > > <rhondaleak...@earthling.net> wrote: > >> Sunny wrote: > >>> "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in message > >>>news:e0689486-8a99-4842-9d32-9770627ba2f2@k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com... > >>> On Oct 25, 2:38 am, "Sunny" <wombatho...@yahoo.com.au> wrote: > >>>> "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in > >>>> messagenews:8289d62b-ecea-45e6-afe6-371ae50a92c8@u10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com... > >>>> <snip rant> > > >> <snip> > > >>> BTW when are you going to realise that the clown that claims to be > >>> Peter Lucas is not him? > > >> He knows, but he doesn't care ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Never truer words written~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > You have no idea what I'm talking about, so you confabulate some weird > nonsense to make you seem (to yourself only) that you do. > > You should be aware, however, that some of your remarks border on actionable > libel, and if you get sued, you'll have no one to blame but yourself.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - TALK ABOUT? All you do is set around and bitch woman, if you don't like what you are reading (((DON'T OPEN IT))) Dasn't do that huh------We might talk about you. I've been around a long time RL, I remember when you and that damn Russian were sexing each other up, I remember when you broke your Fumar cause you can't land worth a shit. That why you ride a broom now Witchie poo? ;-*
Re: what ''shit' ' Now if Red China annexe's Australia one Texans opinion ;-)
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:47
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:47
58 lines
3713 bytes
3713 bytes
On Oct 27, 10:11 pm, Aussie <Aus...@home.upstairs.in.brissie.aus> wrote: > "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhondaleak...@earthling.net> wrote innews:8is4ufF1u7U1@mid.individual.net: > > > > > > > > > Aussie wrote: > >> "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhondaleak...@earthling.net> wrote in > >>news:8iqp96F23qU1@mid.individual.net: > > >>> the unknown flailer wrote: > > >>> You have no idea what I'm talking about, so you confabulate some > >>> weird nonsense to make you seem (to yourself only) that you do. > > >>> You should be aware, however, that some of your remarks border on > >>> actionable libel, and if you get sued, you'll have no one to blame > >>> but yourself. > > >> You can't get blood from a stone..... and you can just tell by the > >> bullshit it comes out with that the major asset it has in its life is > >> its computer and internet access. > > > Some states have criminal libel laws. > > >http://volokh.com/2010/06/08/about-200-criminal-libelslander- > convictions- > > in-virginia-from-2001-to-2008/ > > Unfortunately, shit-4-brains lives in Texass, IIRC. > > > > >> I really don't know why people continue to talk to it. > > > I want to gag it. > > The best way to gag it, is killfile it and never 'talk' to it again. > > > -- > Peter Lucas > Hobart > Tasmania > > If riding in an airplane is flying, then riding in a boat is swimming..If > you want to experience the element, get out of the vehicle !- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - She can't----I have the President of your fan club in the palm of my hand. ;-)
Re: what ''shit' ' Now the difference between colony's down under and on this side of the Pacific. Anthropological thesis
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:49
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:49
108 lines
6354 bytes
6354 bytes
On Oct 28, 3:36 am, "Spartan613" <nos...@buggeroff.com> wrote: > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in messagenews:5c26e3c0-cb2a-4d6d-a17e-4f1397480aa0@t20g2000yqa.googlegroups.com... > On Oct 27, 12:43 am, "Spartan613" <nos...@buggeroff.com> wrote: > > > > > > > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in > > messagenews:c4f14262-1fc7-4690-83b6-cad4ed57e0f7@l8g2000yql.googlegroups.com... > > On Oct 26, 1:48 am, "Spartan613" <nos...@buggeroff.com> wrote: > > > > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in > > > messagenews:8289d62b-ecea-45e6-afe6-371ae50a92c8@u10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com... > > > On Oct 24, 10:29 pm, the unknown flailer <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote: > > > > > On Oct 22, 2:25 am, "Sunny" <wombatho...@yahoo.com.au> wrote: > > > > > > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in > > > > > messagenews:bed1af5a-0b18-4249-b913-aa703d30b17a@p26g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... > > > > > > Ahhhhh I'm cumming, you made my month woman and BTW Peters enough of > > > > > a > > > > > schemer to set up fake accounts to fool > > > > > <snip rest of garbage> > > > > > > ** Are you going through a second childhood, or you just a boofhead > > > > > ? > > > > > Dayum I try to be cement good relations between the U.S. & white trash > > > > like the Tas-maniacs and Au-strange-aliens then they get in a snit. > > > > 0~;-> > > > > But thats to be expected, Australia and Tasmania were English prison > > > colony's unlike the U.S. and Canada where > > > furs and crops were paramount or the Caribbean Islands where sugar > > > cane was king...They had to send working types > > > Or indentured servants to North America and slaves to the > > > islands....Australia and Tasmania? Debtors from London jails and > > > prison guards, neither desirable or industrious stock IMHO. Plus > > > Canada had a French English mixture and the U.S. > > > French/English/Spanish and we opened our doors to immigrant's and > > > received rich diversity...Au & Tas? Pretty well closed > > > up, no body of color or with slant eyes was allowed in until only > > > recently at the very end of the 20th century....That sick trash down > > > there is lucky I'm willing to help them with their emotional problems. > > > And the ANZAC? Like most AuTas they talk a good fight but have no ass > > > to back it up....The Turks whipped their ass in WW I and Japan was > > > going to make a colony of white slaves out of them till they made the > > > mistake of attacking Pearl and pissing the U.S. off. So there it is, > > > > I have a Vietnam foot note, they were involved there as part of the > > > SEATO pack I believe, Sent their best the SAS----I was not impressed, > > > they stayed in their fort > > > > ************ > > > > Where was this "fort"? > > > A old French fighting position left over from their colonial rule, > > looked like it had been created by Hollywood for a Beau Gest > > movie only smaller like a Château. > > > **** > > > Can you be more specific? > > > A super-soldier like you would be able to rattle off the MGRS or Lat-Long > > for it, surely? > > > -- > > "God is not on the side of the big battalions, but of those who shoot the > > best". Voltaire..- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > It was not in III Corps, A French style house in a compound with high > walls around it carrying ramparts...Only 4 > enlisted ANZACS there, middle aged, flabby, balding NCO's ~pitiful~ > They had a lot of beer though, cases of it > stacked head high all around the room they seemed to prefer as a Mess. > Depending on the ARVNS to guard > their gate & perimeter U.S, units had to patrol their A.O.. I was not > impressed, could have taken it away from them with my boat crews who > were basicall fishermen and ex Indo China pirates. If thats your best > the ChiCom should be able to take Australia 1 2 3 as easy as that. If > you want a job later start learning some Chinese dialects bub is my > best advice. > > ********* > > Dumb cunt, aren't you? > Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Better than being Australian and living without a clue. 0~;->
Re: what ''shit' ' Now concerns for Pacific Rim peace and solving Peters sanitary dilemma
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:28
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:28
13 lines
2183 bytes
2183 bytes
On Oct 22, 9:18 am, Krypsis <kryp...@optusnet.com.au> wrote: > > > At 73, I qualify as "there half a century ago" as well. So what? > > Krypsis- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Beautiful------Well being Austalian you were probably so drunk you had no idea where "there" was. If you found any loose wool in your drawers I wouldn't be surprised. Damn what a Whanker....I bet the Queens proud 0~;-*
Re: what ''shit' ' Now the difference between colony's down under and on this side of the Pacific. Anthropological thesis
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:31
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:31
22 lines
2869 bytes
2869 bytes
On Oct 25, 2:38 am, "Sunny" <wombatho...@yahoo.com.au> wrote: > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in messagenews:8289d62b-ecea-45e6-afe6-371ae50a92c8@u10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com... > <snip rant> > I have a Vietnam foot note, they were involved there as part of the > SEATO pack I believe, Sent their best the SAS----I was not impressed, > they stayed in their fort and bad mouthed the USMC > <snip> > > Your involvement in SVN was .....................? > Read some History, instead of inventing your own. > As well as SASR we had a Task Force of 6000 Infantry (Rotated 9 Bns each 3 > years) and The AATV (Trg Team) > Your US Commander gave us the main responsibility for 3 Corps area (look > it up on a Map) > I was an Infantry Coy CSM with 8 Bn RAR on combat operations in SVN > 1969-1970 and worked with a lot of US Army, Navy Engineers, Artillery, and > Air Force. Kind of important for a private weren't you? (((((((((((NOT IMPRESSED)))))))))))
Re: what ''shit' ' Now if Red China annexe's Australia one Texans opinion ;-)
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:46
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:46
37 lines
3625 bytes
3625 bytes
On Oct 25, 6:04 pm, "Sunny" <wombatho...@yahoo.com.au> wrote: > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in messagenews:e0689486-8a99-4842-9d32-9770627ba2f2@k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com... > On Oct 25, 2:38 am, "Sunny" <wombatho...@yahoo.com.au> wrote: > > > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in > > messagenews:8289d62b-ecea-45e6-afe6-371ae50a92c8@u10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com... > > <snip rant> > > I have a Vietnam foot note, they were involved there as part of the > > SEATO pack I believe, Sent their best the SAS----I was not impressed, > > they stayed in their fort and bad mouthed the USMC > > <snip> > > You believe wrong it is the ANZUS pact, Australia is not part of SEATO > > > > > Your involvement in SVN was .....................? > > 3 times during the 1960's the last ending July 1970 And this > philosophy of mine about the PRC annexing Australia is valid. > <snip> > Why am I not surprised that you would twist out of ANZUS. > > BTW when are you going to realise that the clown that claims to be Peter > Lucas is not him? Doesn't matter does it, we took the thread away from his creator? The mook has to struggle to get a post in edge wise. And we got your ANUS covered mutton eater, eyes front! "Anchors away my boys, Anchors away" We are pulling into an Australian port, keep your flap buttoned, up and your billfold under your jumper. Don't tie your kerchief with a slip knot----ANZAC will be lurking about in the Alleyways begging for beer and looking for fights. Dumber than a bunch of Marines woo woo Stand Navy down the field and whip them all, Whip them all ~ they can't fight!. 0~;->
Re: what ''shit' ' Now the sheepmens fear
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:57
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:57
19 lines
2776 bytes
2776 bytes
On Oct 27, 10:05 pm, the unknown flailer <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote: > On Oct 26, 1:54 am, "Spartan613" <nos...@buggeroff.com> wrote:>thuythu working the muts > > *I say again. ~NOT IMPRESSED~ Let Red China have Australia and > > *Tasmania too, why should we care? ;-P > > > You'd care fuckin' heaps if the Commies get their hands on our mountains of > > uranium. > > > Fuckwit. I struggle to understand why the U.S. should care about Red China getting a mountain of uranium. Although their style of Government is Communist, it is a stable Government that encourages Capitalism. You Whankers are paranoid. Of course, being that close and not having slant eyes nor a strong Army could be unnerving I reckon, have another beer and don't worry about it. Texas isn't.. <g>
Page 1 of 2 • 83 total messages
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads