🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

83 total messages Page 1 of 2 Started by Peter Lucas Tue, 05 Oct 2010 21:59
Page 1 of 2 • 83 total messages
what ''shit' ' for the common wealth games..............
#2495
Author: Peter Lucas
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 21:59
18 lines
2307 bytes
Now THIS is were we send our athleets?!? Was always been puzzled as to
why so many indians would in the frikken busy sidewalks or even road
sides would simply stop and squat - leaving behind a pile of shit full
of lentils and curry. Later found out that as many as 850 million
indians do not have access to toilet facilities. Hence the famous
indian stop and squat. Wow!

Just do the math. The estimated cost of staging the Common wealth
games ranges from US$4 billion to a wild $23 billion. Surely that
money could have built a lot of frikken toilets! Enough to serve the
850 million stop-and-squatting incompetant indians. And THIS is were
we send our best too?!--

Just a thought.

Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia
Re: what ''shit' ' Now concerns for Pacific Rim peace and solving Peters sanitary dilemma
#2447
Author: OldFella
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 02:21
33 lines
2702 bytes
"the unknown flailer" <thuythu@iwon.com> wrote in message
news:572a6938-84e4-48ce-a2dc-c95c7e45836c@f26g2000vbm.googlegroups.com...

<Snip>

>He and his gay programmer friends in Tasmania have quited down since I
>took a interest,  like the NSA was on their trail



            63.174.133.193

            Country: UNITED STATES
            Region: TEXAS
            City: HENDERSON
            Latitude: 32.1489
            Longitude: -94.781


      Obviously another George W. Bush supporter , sounds like another
wannabe NSA employee, here's the link to apply for a job with them :-) gotta
feel sorry for a person like you.

      https://www.nsa.gov/psp/applyonline/EMPLOYEE/HRMS/c/HRS_HRAM.HRS_CE.GBL?Page=HRS_CE_HM_PRE&Action=A&SiteId=1


      Another very interesting website:
      http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/bushquotes/a/dumbbushquotes.htm

      More ramblings:

      http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/blbushisms.htm
Re: what ''shit' ' Now concerns for Pacific Rim peace and solving Peters sanitary dilemma
#2448
Author: Aussie
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 02:43
43 lines
3036 bytes
"OldFella" <NoSpam@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:4cc0f544$0$25359$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au: 

> 
> "the unknown flailer" <thuythu@iwon.com> wrote in message
> news:572a6938-84e4-48ce-a2dc-
c95c7e45836c@f26g2000vbm.googlegroups.com...
> 
> <Snip>
> 
>>He and his gay programmer friends in Tasmania have quited down since I
>>took a interest,  like the NSA was on their trail
> 
> 
> 
>             63.174.133.193
> 
>             Country: UNITED STATES
>             Region: TEXAS
>             City: HENDERSON
>             Latitude: 32.1489
>             Longitude: -94.781



The "the unknown flailer" aka "Snuffy" is a pathetic little troll 
wannabe/usetabe that hangs out in rec.skydiving baiting anyone and 
everyone so that people will 'talk' to it and make its pathetic life 
meaningful for that day.


It has been kicked out of any and all the moderated skydiving forums as 
it's a completely useless waste of oxygen, with nothing at all to 
contribute to anything.


-- 
Peter Lucas                            
Hobart
Tasmania
  	
If riding in an airplane is flying, then riding in a boat is swimming..If 
you want to experience the element, get out of the vehicle !
Re: what ''shit' ' Now concerns for Pacific Rim peace and solving Peters sanitary dilemma
#2449
Author: OldFella
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 03:51
61 lines
3673 bytes
"Aussie" <Aussie@home.upstairs.in.brissie.aus> wrote in message 
news:Xns9E19817D62864Peterhomeinbrissie@61.9.134.55...
> "OldFella" <NoSpam@hotmail.com> wrote in
> news:4cc0f544$0$25359$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au:
>
>>
>> "the unknown flailer" <thuythu@iwon.com> wrote in message
>> news:572a6938-84e4-48ce-a2dc-
> c95c7e45836c@f26g2000vbm.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> <Snip>
>>
>>>He and his gay programmer friends in Tasmania have quited down since I
>>>took a interest,  like the NSA was on their trail
>>
>>
>>
>>             63.174.133.193
>>
>>             Country: UNITED STATES
>>             Region: TEXAS
>>             City: HENDERSON
>>             Latitude: 32.1489
>>             Longitude: -94.781
>
>
>
> The "the unknown flailer" aka "Snuffy" is a pathetic little troll
> wannabe/usetabe that hangs out in rec.skydiving baiting anyone and
> everyone so that people will 'talk' to it and make its pathetic life
> meaningful for that day.
>
>
> It has been kicked out of any and all the moderated skydiving forums as
> it's a completely useless waste of oxygen, with nothing at all to
> contribute to anything.
>
>
> -- 
> Peter Lucas
> Hobart
> Tasmania
>
> If riding in an airplane is flying, then riding in a boat is swimming..If
> you want to experience the element, get out of the vehicle !



G'day Peter, I like they way you refer to the subject or P.O.I.( person of 
interest) or in his case Person of No Interest , as "it"  no doubt IT will 
keep up the ranting, there was a person like it in a couple of Amateur and 
CB Radio N/G's a long while back, he was obviously compulsively obcessed 
with being the head honcho in the news groups, even when most readers 
ignored his postings he would copy and paste his earlier postings flooding 
the N/G with his trash, most people using Outlook Express simply did the 
Block Sender trick, it made for much better reading , anyhow enough from me,

Have a good one,

OldFella 
Re: what ''shit' ' Now concerns for Pacific Rim peace and solving Peters sanitary dilemma
#2450
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 06:13
33 lines
3146 bytes
On Oct 21, 9:21 pm, "OldFella" <NoS...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in messagenews:572a6938-84e4-48ce-a2dc-c95c7e45836c@f26g2000vbm.googlegroups.com...
>
> <Snip>
>
> >He and his gay programmer friends in Tasmania have quited down since I
> >took a interest,  like the NSA was on their trail
>
>             63.174.133.193
>
>             Country: UNITED STATES
>             Region: TEXAS
>             City: HENDERSON
>             Latitude: 32.1489
>             Longitude: -94.781
>
Not even close....Another guy had me down around Shepard.....Either
yawls soft ware sucks or the backwoods routing system changes gateways
depending on time of day day of week or who's asking. Effective eh?



>       Obviously another George W. Bush supporter , sounds like another
> wannabe NSA employee, here's the link to apply for a job with them :-) gotta
> feel sorry for a person like you.
>


Not even close again, I voted against the asshole in every election,
even when he was running for Governor of Texas. . ;-*
Re: what ''shit' ' Now concerns for Pacific Rim peace and solving Peters sanitary dilemma
#2451
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 06:19
44 lines
3371 bytes
On Oct 21, 9:43 pm, Aussie <Aus...@home.upstairs.in.brissie.aus>
wrote:
> "OldFella" <NoS...@hotmail.com> wrote innews:4cc0f544$0$25359$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au:
>
>
>
> > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in message
> > news:572a6938-84e4-48ce-a2dc-
>
> c95c7e458...@f26g2000vbm.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > <Snip>
>
> >>He and his gay programmer friends in Tasmania have quited down since I
> >>took a interest,  like the NSA was on their trail
>
> >             63.174.133.193
>
> >             Country: UNITED STATES
> >             Region: TEXAS
> >             City: HENDERSON
> >             Latitude: 32.1489
> >             Longitude: -94.781
>
> The "the unknown flailer" aka "Snuffy" is a pathetic little troll
> wannabe/usetabe that hangs out in rec.skydiving baiting anyone and
> everyone so that people will 'talk' to it and make its pathetic life
> meaningful for that day.
>
> It has been kicked out of any and all the moderated skydiving forums as
> it's a completely useless waste of oxygen, with nothing at all to
> contribute to anything.
>
> --
> Peter Lucas                            
> Hobart
> Tasmania
>
I call them like I see them and that seems to piss nervous people
off....I love pissing losers---Foreign or Domestic off and you qualify
drag queen.
Re: what ''shit' ' Now concerns for Pacific Rim peace and solving Peters sanitary dilemma
#2452
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 06:34
72 lines
5248 bytes
On Oct 11, 9:09 am, Krypsis <kryp...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> On 11/10/2010 12:27 PM, the unknown flailer wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Oct 9, 9:43 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries"
> > <rhondaleak...@earthling.net>  wrote:
> >> the unknown flailer wrote:
> >>> On Oct 7, 2:24 pm, george<gbl...@hnpl.net>  wrote:
> >>>> On Oct 6, 10:59 am, Peter Lucas<ruthsbed...@lavabit.com>  wrote:
>
> >>>>> Just a thought.
>
> >>>> Comes of jumping without a canopy I'm afraid but as he landed on his
> >>>> head there was no damage apart from a strange need to post crap...
>
> >>> I think Peter is a natural, a small man with a small spirit and what
> >>> there is of it is mean...He over compensates by acting ugly...Also a
> >>> huge amount  of  petty jealousy is involved...His country was passed
> >>> over for India to hold the games.. A real kick in the Brisbane balls.
> >>> A pair of what GB and her Colonials call gum boots but known as Rubber
> >>> boots in  the good Ole USA should solve his complaint. I personally
> >>> think Canada should have got the games----They are  part of North
> >>> America and not as backward as Australia thanks to their neighbor to
> >>> the Souths influence. ~zing zing right up the kazoo~  0~;-) Snuffy
> >>> "promoter of peace between third world Nations"
>
> >> Your brains have leaked out of your ears entirely.
>
> >> Peter has nothing to do with any of these posts, you stupid, senile old man.- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > He and his gay programmer friends in Tasmania have quited down since I
> > took a interest,  like the NSA was on their trail
>
> "quited"???  "took a interest"???  Looks like the English grammar wasn't
> your forte in school.
>
> By the way, the NSA has nothing to do with Australia. The National
> Security Agency/Central Security Service (NSA/CSS) is a cryptologic
> intelligence agency of the United States Department of Defense
> responsible for the collection and analysis of foreign communications
> and foreign signals intelligence, as well as protecting U.S. government
> communications and information systems,[1] which involves cryptanalysis
> and cryptography. As such, Peter and his friends, whatever their
> orientation, have nothing to fear from the NSA
>
> Krypsis- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Dunno, everything has changed in the 50 years since I've been
out....It used to be a electronic Intelligence collecting agency and
had use of a para military arm from the Company to do its dirty
work....Even Navy rates have changed,
used to be CT's were crypto technicians and mainly spied on the
airwaves...Now CT's are Communication Techs
and have replaced the Radioman rate, of course appearances can be
deceiving I figure they still have a separate branch of CT's that
listens to everybody's traffic....What used to piss me off was sure
they spied on USSR Communications but they monitored us also, pretty
chicken shit spying on your own people if you ask me, They did it to
enforce radio procedure but it still pissed Fleet Radiomen off. So
there you are whipper snapper a history lesson in comm from someone
who was there half a century ago on active service. ;)P
Re: what ''shit' ' Now concerns for Pacific Rim peace and solving Peters sanitary dilemma
#2453
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 06:41
35 lines
3487 bytes
On Oct 9, 9:43 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries"
<rhondaleak...@earthling.net> wrote:
> the unknown flailer wrote:
> > On Oct 7, 2:24 pm, george <gbl...@hnpl.net> wrote:
> >> On Oct 6, 10:59 am, Peter Lucas <ruthsbed...@lavabit.com> wrote:
>
> >>> Just a thought.
>
> >> Comes of jumping without a canopy I'm afraid but as he landed on his
> >> head there was no damage apart from a strange need to post crap...
>
> > I think Peter is a natural, a small man with a small spirit and what
> > there is of it is mean...He over compensates by acting ugly...Also a
> > huge amount  of  petty jealousy is involved...His country was passed
> > over for India to hold the games.. A real kick in the Brisbane balls.
> > A pair of what GB and her Colonials call gum boots but known as Rubber
> > boots in  the good Ole USA should solve his complaint. I personally
> > think Canada should have got the games----They are  part of North
> > America and not as backward as Australia thanks to their neighbor to
> > the Souths influence. ~zing zing right up the kazoo~  0~;-) Snuffy
> > "promoter of peace between third world Nations"
>
> Your brains have leaked out of your ears entirely.
>
> Peter has nothing to do with any of these posts, you stupid, senile old man.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Ahhhhh I'm cumming, you made my month woman and BTW Peters enough of a
schemer to set up fake accounts to fool
young dumb ass's like you and Whineor to get away with filth while
appearing to be the injured party...Ever think of that Missy know it
all? Now give me tung Jersey girl ;)P
Re: what ''shit' ' Now concerns for Pacific Rim peace and solving Peters sanitary dilemma
#2454
Author: Sunny
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 07:25
9 lines
1866 bytes
"the unknown flailer" <thuythu@iwon.com> wrote in message 
news:bed1af5a-0b18-4249-b913-aa703d30b17a@p26g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...

Ahhhhh I'm cumming, you made my month woman and BTW Peters enough of a
schemer to set up fake accounts to fool
<snip rest of garbage>

** Are you going through a second childhood, or you just a boofhead ? 
Re: what ''shit' ' Now concerns for Pacific Rim peace and solving Peters sanitary dilemma
#2455
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 14:03
14 lines
2307 bytes
On Oct 22, 2:25 am, "Sunny" <wombatho...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in messagenews:bed1af5a-0b18-4249-b913-aa703d30b17a@p26g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
>
> Ahhhhh I'm cumming, you made my month woman and BTW Peters enough of a
> schemer to set up fake accounts to fool
> <snip rest of garbage>
>
> ** Are you going through a second childhood, or you just a boofhead ?

I like to see phonies pop their corks and point out deceivers & filthy
scum bags like the down under crew.
Things like this amuse me.  "boofhead".... are you old enough to post
child does your mommy know you are on a computer? ;->
Re: what ''shit' ' Now concerns for Pacific Rim peace and solving Peters sanitary dilemma
#2456
Author: Krypsis
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 14:18
77 lines
5122 bytes
On 22/10/2010 5:34 PM, the unknown flailer wrote:
> On Oct 11, 9:09 am, Krypsis<kryp...@optusnet.com.au>  wrote:
>> On 11/10/2010 12:27 PM, the unknown flailer wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Oct 9, 9:43 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries"
>>> <rhondaleak...@earthling.net>    wrote:
>>>> the unknown flailer wrote:
>>>>> On Oct 7, 2:24 pm, george<gbl...@hnpl.net>    wrote:
>>>>>> On Oct 6, 10:59 am, Peter Lucas<ruthsbed...@lavabit.com>    wrote:
>>
>>>>>>> Just a thought.
>>
>>>>>> Comes of jumping without a canopy I'm afraid but as he landed on his
>>>>>> head there was no damage apart from a strange need to post crap...
>>
>>>>> I think Peter is a natural, a small man with a small spirit and what
>>>>> there is of it is mean...He over compensates by acting ugly...Also a
>>>>> huge amount  of  petty jealousy is involved...His country was passed
>>>>> over for India to hold the games.. A real kick in the Brisbane balls.
>>>>> A pair of what GB and her Colonials call gum boots but known as Rubber
>>>>> boots in  the good Ole USA should solve his complaint. I personally
>>>>> think Canada should have got the games----They are  part of North
>>>>> America and not as backward as Australia thanks to their neighbor to
>>>>> the Souths influence. ~zing zing right up the kazoo~  0~;-) Snuffy
>>>>> "promoter of peace between third world Nations"
>>
>>>> Your brains have leaked out of your ears entirely.
>>
>>>> Peter has nothing to do with any of these posts, you stupid, senile old man.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>
>>> He and his gay programmer friends in Tasmania have quited down since I
>>> took a interest,  like the NSA was on their trail
>>
>> "quited"???  "took a interest"???  Looks like the English grammar wasn't
>> your forte in school.
>>
>> By the way, the NSA has nothing to do with Australia. The National
>> Security Agency/Central Security Service (NSA/CSS) is a cryptologic
>> intelligence agency of the United States Department of Defense
>> responsible for the collection and analysis of foreign communications
>> and foreign signals intelligence, as well as protecting U.S. government
>> communications and information systems,[1] which involves cryptanalysis
>> and cryptography. As such, Peter and his friends, whatever their
>> orientation, have nothing to fear from the NSA
>>
>> Krypsis- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> Dunno, everything has changed in the 50 years since I've been
> out....It used to be a electronic Intelligence collecting agency and

Nothing stays the same ... except your childish level of intelligence. 
Actually, I think it's regressing if anything!

> had use of a para military arm from the Company to do its dirty
> work....Even Navy rates have changed,
> used to be CT's were crypto technicians and mainly spied on the
> airwaves...Now CT's are Communication Techs
> and have replaced the Radioman rate, of course appearances can be
> deceiving I figure they still have a separate branch of CT's that
> listens to everybody's traffic....What used to piss me off was sure
> they spied on USSR Communications but they monitored us also, pretty
> chicken shit spying on your own people if you ask me, They did it to
> enforce radio procedure but it still pissed Fleet Radiomen off. So
> there you are whipper snapper a history lesson in comm from someone
> who was there half a century ago on active service. ;)P

At 73, I qualify as "there half a century ago" as well. So what?

Krypsis
Re: what ''shit' ' for the common wealth games..............
#2457
Author: Chemo the Clown
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:34
15 lines
1949 bytes
On Oct 5, 3:37 pm, Chemo the Clown <an...@peak.org> wrote:
> On Oct 5, 3:08 pm, notbob <not...@nothome.com> wrote:
>
> > On 2010-10-05, Peter Lucas <ruthsbed...@lavabit.com> wrote:
>
> > > sides would simply stop and squat - leaving behind a pile of
> > >  shit.....
>
> > Much like you posts, here.  Back in the crap corral with you.
>
> > nb
>
> I wish he could write in complete sentence structure....at the least.

I don't think 4 years can quite do that yet.
Re: what ''shit' ' Now concerns for Pacific Rim peace and solving Peters sanitary dilemma
#2458
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 22:20
20 lines
2333 bytes
On Oct 22, 9:18 am, Krypsis <kryp...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> On 22/10/2010 5:34 PM, the unknown flailer wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Oct 11, 9:09 am, Krypsis<kryp...@optusnet.com.au>  wrote:
> >> On 11/10/2010 12:27 PM, the unknown flailer wrote:
>
> someone who was there half a century ago on active service. ;)P
>
> At 73, I qualify as "there half a century ago" as well. So what?
>
> Krypsis- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

No you don't, you are just another sissy foreigner, you fairies never
could win a war without us carrying you.
Re: what ''shit' ' Now concerns for Pacific Rim peace and working to improve anglo relations
#2459
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 00:29
16 lines
2235 bytes
On Oct 22, 9:18 am, Krypsis <kryp...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> On 22/10/2010 5:34 PM, the unknown flailer wrote:
>

 >>>>>>>>>>0~;-) Snuffy "promoter of peace between third world
Nations"

> At 73, I qualify as "there half a century ago" as well. So what?
>
> Krypsis- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Nothing but Fags and crooks in your part of the Pacific Rim so you
have been one or the other for 73 years,
what you want me to do pop a flare?
Re: what ''shit' ' Now concerns for Pacific Rim peace, they have bad attitudes after we rescued them in the 40's
#2460
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 03:29
13 lines
2243 bytes
On Oct 22, 2:25 am, "Sunny" <wombatho...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in messagenews:bed1af5a-0b18-4249-b913-aa703d30b17a@p26g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
>
> Ahhhhh I'm cumming, you made my month woman and BTW Peters enough of a
> schemer to set up fake accounts to fool
> <snip rest of garbage>
>
> ** Are you going through a second childhood, or you just a boofhead ?

Dayum I try to be cement good relations between the U.S. & white trash
like the Tas-maniacs and Au-strange-aliens then they get in a snit.
0~;->
Re: what ''shit' ' Now the difference between colony's down under and on this side of the Pacific. Anthropological thesis
#2461
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 07:06
61 lines
5331 bytes
On Oct 24, 10:29 pm, the unknown flailer <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote:
> On Oct 22, 2:25 am, "Sunny" <wombatho...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>
> > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in messagenews:bed1af5a-0b18-4249-b913-aa703d30b17a@p26g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
>
> > Ahhhhh I'm cumming, you made my month woman and BTW Peters enough of a
> > schemer to set up fake accounts to fool
> > <snip rest of garbage>
>
> > ** Are you going through a second childhood, or you just a boofhead ?
>
> Dayum I try to be cement good relations between the U.S. & white trash
> like the Tas-maniacs and Au-strange-aliens then they get in a snit.
> 0~;->

But thats to be expected, Australia and Tasmania were English prison
colony's unlike the U.S. and Canada where
furs and crops were paramount or the Caribbean Islands where sugar
cane was king...They had to send working types
Or indentured servants to North America and slaves to the
islands....Australia and Tasmania? Debtors from London jails and
prison guards, neither desirable or industrious stock IMHO. Plus
Canada had a French English mixture and the U.S.
French/English/Spanish and we opened our doors to immigrant's and
received rich diversity...Au & Tas? Pretty well closed
up, no body of color or with slant eyes was allowed in until only
recently at the very end of the 20th century....That sick trash down
there is lucky I'm willing to help them with their emotional problems.
And the ANZAC? Like most AuTas they talk a good fight but have no ass
to back it up....The Turks whipped their ass in WW I and Japan was
going to make a colony of white slaves out of them till they made the
mistake of  attacking Pearl and pissing the U.S. off. So there it is,

I have a Vietnam foot note, they were involved there as part of the
SEATO pack I believe, Sent their best the SAS----I was not impressed,
they stayed in their fort and bad mouthed the USMC...I make fun of the
Corps myself but thats OK, their ours and since breaking away from the
Navy in the 1950's have become uppity. I stopped at the ANZAC fort a
couple of times because it was at the end of my patrol line, here sat
these ANZAC Advisor's inside the fort with cases of stubbies pilled
around them, Couldn't wait to tell me some Marines had been killed
within sight of their Fort walls....I said "Well thats what happens
when you patrol...It throws the enemy off balance and tends to piss
them off---They were all middle aged and fat around the middle every
one of them had three white chevrons and a SAS badge. Unlike us they
didn't live with the Vietnamese in a local village, they stayed in
their fort----That kind of mentality didn't work against the American
Indians of the old west and it didn't cut it in Asia either....You got
to get out there and contest the country side...I was so disillusioned
with ANZAC that I turned down R&R to Australia preferring to go to
Taiwan. The X.O. said "what are you crazy?" You live and fight beside
Asians and now your taking your break with Asians? "Yes Sir, I just
don't like Australians, they strike me as blowhards." "You and I have
not seen a round eyed woman in at least 6 months and you choose
Taiwan?" "Unless you are willing to send me to Canada on R&R, I'm
willing to take a chance on living six more months then see some real
round eyed North American women YES SIR !!!!" Well he didn't think
that was too damn funny and stamped my R&R orders for Taiwan without
further comment.
 ~there it is~   those jack wagons down under don't have me fooled. .
Re: what ''shit' ' Now the difference between colony's down under and on this side of the Pacific. Anthropological thesis
#2462
Author: Sunny
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 07:38
20 lines
2674 bytes
"the unknown flailer" <thuythu@iwon.com> wrote in message 
news:8289d62b-ecea-45e6-afe6-371ae50a92c8@u10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
<snip rant>
I have a Vietnam foot note, they were involved there as part of the
SEATO pack I believe, Sent their best the SAS----I was not impressed,
they stayed in their fort and bad mouthed the USMC
<snip>

Your involvement in SVN was .....................?
Read some History, instead of inventing your own.
As well as SASR we had a Task Force of 6000 Infantry (Rotated 9 Bns each 3 
years) and The AATV (Trg Team)
Your US Commander gave us the main responsibility for 3 Corps area (look 
it up on a Map)
I was an Infantry Coy CSM with 8 Bn RAR on combat operations in SVN 
1969-1970 and worked with a lot of US Army, Navy Engineers, Artillery, and 
Air Force.
Which Australian Units did you get "involved with"  to form your "I was 
not impressed" mantra? 
Re: what ''shit' ' Now the difference between colony's down under and on this side of the Pacific. Anthropological thesis
#2463
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 16:01
43 lines
4194 bytes
On Oct 25, 2:38 am, "Sunny" <wombatho...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in messagenews:8289d62b-ecea-45e6-afe6-371ae50a92c8@u10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
> <snip rant>
> I have a Vietnam foot note, they were involved there as part of the
> SEATO pack I believe, Sent their best the SAS----I was not impressed,
> they stayed in their fort and bad mouthed the USMC
> <snip>
>
> Your involvement in SVN was .....................?
> Read some History, instead of inventing your own.
> As well as SASR we had a Task Force of 6000 Infantry (Rotated 9 Bns each 3
> years) and The AATV (Trg Team)
> Your US Commander gave us the main responsibility for 3 Corps area (look
> it up on a Map)
> I was an Infantry Coy CSM with 8 Bn RAR on combat operations in SVN
> 1969-1970 and worked with a lot of US Army, Navy Engineers, Artillery, and
> Air Force.
> Which Australian Units did you get "involved with"  to form your "I was
> not impressed" mantra?

Don't need to, I lived history and I know what I saw Same/same last
tour 1969 till 1970, with two prior trips---61/62 & 64/65....They were
Advisor's to the ARVNS...Old guys. more interested in drinking beer
than getting out with indigenous troops and mixing it up with the
enemy---I remember thinking geezus it must take a long time to earn a
stripe in the ANZAC, These guys are in their 40's and only have 3. One
of them had 3 stripes and a crown, he seemed fairly sober & squared
away but the others? Lazy bunch of beer swilling bullshitters,
wouldn't make a pimple on the sorriest Marines ass. Don't blame them
for not wanting to fight, we shouldn't have been there anyway...It
wasn't their war, Vietnam was no threat to them. Seems they earned
elite badges to swagger around and do nothing. In America you earn one
and you have to use that training for other than caging beer. Another
thing the majority of you ass holes are Urban not  tough out back
types. I'll guarantee every one of you with a computer are city
people....Kind of like  Dallas, Houston or out right  big city
Yankee's over here wearing boots and a 10 gallon hat pretending to be
cowboys, you ain't worth spit. Don't worry though Americans and
Canadian forces have Pac Rim Sissy's covered if you are ever
attacked.  ;-P
Re: what ''shit' ' Now the difference between colony's down under and on this side of the Pacific. Anthropological thesis
#2464
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 17:47
30 lines
3610 bytes
On Oct 25, 2:38 am, "Sunny" <wombatho...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in messagenews:8289d62b-ecea-45e6-afe6-371ae50a92c8@u10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
> <snip rant>
> I have a Vietnam foot note, they were involved there as part of the
> SEATO pack I believe, Sent their best the SAS----I was not impressed,
> they stayed in their fort and bad mouthed the USMC
> <snip>

> Which Australian Units did you get "involved with"  to form your "I was
> not impressed" mantra?

I wasn't involved with them, the drunken bums were at the end of my
patrol line. Its clear the U.S. unit involved could have been US Army
of the Boy Scouts of America for all I know, it happened the month
before and seeing the subdued tag on my jungle fatigues said U.S. Navy
they thought I'd go "Oh yeah, USMC not worth a shit." and get drunk
with them. Not going to happen, I had kilometers to go to reach my
outpost and didn't plan on doing it with a hang over. The U.S. forces
were trying to clear a LZ outside the ANZAC Fort and tripped off a
105mm shell left as a gift by the enemy. Its clear to me
ANZAC couldn't handle their A.O. so the U.S. Commander sent a US Unit
down there to patrol it and protect them.  The bums never went outside
their gate, saying the US Unit med evacuated their own dead and
wounded then moved off. Clearly Australian Forces had some old bums
just marking time until retirement and they fostered them off on MACV.
tsk tsk tsk and now here 40 years later are the Australians  showing
up again......As what?  Tough talking Pedophiles and gay boys on
wreck. I say again.  ~NOT IMPRESSED~ Let Red China have Australia and
Tasmania too, why should we care? ;-P
Re: what ''shit' ' Now if Red China annexe's Australia one Texans opinion ;-)
#2402
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 22:32
47 lines
4131 bytes
On Oct 26, 2:28 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries"
<rhondaleak...@earthling.net> wrote:
> Sunny wrote:
> > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in message
> >news:e0689486-8a99-4842-9d32-9770627ba2f2@k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
> > On Oct 25, 2:38 am, "Sunny" <wombatho...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> >> "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in
> >> messagenews:8289d62b-ecea-45e6-afe6-371ae50a92c8@u10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
> >> <snip rant>
>
> <snip>
>
> > BTW when are you going to realise that the clown that claims to be
> > Peter Lucas is not him?
>
> He knows, but he doesn't care if it will enable him to stir some shit. He'd
> a good candidate for auk when the lawsuit is over and the FNVW is able to
> post again.

No lawsuit to it Buggery man down in Australia fabricated Peter Lucas
and is suspected of doctoring a phony
ANUS agreement between the United States and Australia in hopes of
involving the U.S. in a war with China.
Since buggery is illegal in Texas, he will be arrested and held on
Buggery charges if he ever cross's our state line.
Held without bail and tried for producing fake International documents
& bother on rec. skydiving by posing as
Peter Lucas....We have a special cell block for skizo's like sunny @
Wombat.Au, Bars but no windows or screens,
We are now going through Texas penal records, searching for a 300
pound black man with a mix of Chinese blood
to be his cell mate....This should fulfill his anal fixation and
desire for buggery. Not to mention, avert the war between
the United States and Peoples Republic of China he is planning by
using this fake ANUS document he claims
Australia has saying American troops will be sent to prevent an
Invasion of Australia by 10,000,000,000 PLA
soldiers. Texas being attached to the U.S. will be dragged into the
middle of this Armageddon like war. And for
what, to save a bunch of drunk Australians ?  So now you have the
scoop Yankee momma, put your apron back
on and do your house work and quit being a busybody before you are
suspected of being a Fifth columnist and
enemy of the State, . ;-*
Re: what ''shit' ' Now if Red China annexe's Australia one Texans opinion ;-)
#2403
Author: Aussie
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 03:27
25 lines
2756 bytes
"Sunny" <wombathouse@yahoo.com.au> wrote in
news:Yzvxo.492$MF5.248@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com: 

> 
> "the unknown flailer" <thuythu@iwon.com> wrote in message 

> BTW  Australia did not have any "Forts" in SVN


Sunny....... you're never going to win with that moron "Snuffy". It's a troll 
of the highest order, *anything* you say, it will counter with its own brand 
of lies and bullshit just to keep you talking to it.

Doing that is the only reason that keeps it alive.

I have also taken out the irrelevant crossposting groups.


-- 
Peter Lucas                            
Hobart
Tasmania
  	
If riding in an airplane is flying, then riding in a boat is swimming..If you 
want to experience the element, get out of the vehicle !
Re: what ''shit' ' Now the difference between colony's down under and on this side of the Pacific. Anthropological thesis
#2404
Author: Spartan613
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 05:43
62 lines
4813 bytes
"the unknown flailer" <thuythu@iwon.com> wrote in message 
news:c4f14262-1fc7-4690-83b6-cad4ed57e0f7@l8g2000yql.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 26, 1:48 am, "Spartan613" <nos...@buggeroff.com> wrote:
> "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in 
> messagenews:8289d62b-ecea-45e6-afe6-371ae50a92c8@u10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
> On Oct 24, 10:29 pm, the unknown flailer <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote:
>
> > On Oct 22, 2:25 am, "Sunny" <wombatho...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>
> > > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in
> > > messagenews:bed1af5a-0b18-4249-b913-aa703d30b17a@p26g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > Ahhhhh I'm cumming, you made my month woman and BTW Peters enough of a
> > > schemer to set up fake accounts to fool
> > > <snip rest of garbage>
>
> > > ** Are you going through a second childhood, or you just a boofhead ?
>
> > Dayum I try to be cement good relations between the U.S. & white trash
> > like the Tas-maniacs and Au-strange-aliens then they get in a snit.
> > 0~;->
>
> But thats to be expected, Australia and Tasmania were English prison
> colony's unlike the U.S. and Canada where
> furs and crops were paramount or the Caribbean Islands where sugar
> cane was king...They had to send working types
> Or indentured servants to North America and slaves to the
> islands....Australia and Tasmania? Debtors from London jails and
> prison guards, neither desirable or industrious stock IMHO. Plus
> Canada had a French English mixture and the U.S.
> French/English/Spanish and we opened our doors to immigrant's and
> received rich diversity...Au & Tas? Pretty well closed
> up, no body of color or with slant eyes was allowed in until only
> recently at the very end of the 20th century....That sick trash down
> there is lucky I'm willing to help them with their emotional problems.
> And the ANZAC? Like most AuTas they talk a good fight but have no ass
> to back it up....The Turks whipped their ass in WW I and Japan was
> going to make a colony of white slaves out of them till they made the
> mistake of attacking Pearl and pissing the U.S. off. So there it is,
>
> I have a Vietnam foot note, they were involved there as part of the
> SEATO pack I believe, Sent their best the SAS----I was not impressed,
> they stayed in their fort
>
> ************
>
> Where was this "fort"?

A old French fighting position left over from their colonial rule,
looked like it had been created by Hollywood for a Beau Gest
movie only smaller like a Chateu.

****

Can you be more specific?

A super-soldier like you would be able to rattle off the MGRS or Lat-Long 
for it, surely?

-- 
"God is not on the side of the big battalions, but of those who shoot the 
best". Voltaire..
Re: what ''shit' ' Now who is Peter Lucas?
#2405
Author: Spartan613
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 05:45
31 lines
2881 bytes
"the unknown flailer" <thuythu@iwon.com> wrote in message 
news:f5ac4a9f-3a31-47ed-948a-7d0b512e5bf5@a36g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 26, 1:48 am, "Spartan613" <nos...@buggeroff.com> wrote:
> you.
>
> --
> "God is not on the side of the big battalions, but of those who shoot the
> best". Voltaire..


The cluck that fabricates that Peter Lucas crap is inclined to add tag
lines also, makes you look like a suspect
I notice you have more than one account also-----tsk tsk tsk. I begin
to understand how Australia was dumb enough
to sign a ANUS agreement with the United States now. Not enough
Prepreation H in the world to cover that mate! ;)P


***********

Are you talking to;

A. Peter Lucas,

B. Me,

C. The voices in your head.

-- 
"God is not on the side of the big battalions, but of those who shoot the 
best". Voltaire..
Re: what ''shit' ' Now if Red China annexe's Australia one Texans opinion ;-)
#2406
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 05:50
72 lines
5166 bytes
On Oct 26, 10:27 pm, Aussie <Aus...@home.upstairs.in.brissie.aus>
wrote:
> "Sunny" <wombatho...@yahoo.com.au> wrote innews:Yzvxo.492$MF5.248@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com:
>
>
>
> > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in message
> > BTW  Australia did not have any "Forts" in SVN
>
> Sunny....... you're never going to win with that moron "Snuffy". It's a troll
> of the highest order, *anything* you say, it will counter with its own brand
> of lies and bullshit just to keep you talking to it.
>
> Doing that is the only reason that keeps it alive.
>
> I have also taken out the irrelevant crossposting groups.
>
> --
> Peter Lucas                            
> Hobart
> Tasmania
>
> If riding in an airplane is flying, then riding in a boat is swimming..If you
> want to experience the element, get out of the vehicle !

Hummmm talking to yourself I see.

1 My understanding of a troll is the poster leaves a egg much like a
bad smell then disappears to laugh while people freak and carry on
about it screaming hollering and bitching.

In that case I can't be considered a troll because I put the egg out
there and then stay around to scramble it for the dummy's involved.

I understand why you were created, Australians are afraid....Its a
white mans fear, loss of status quo----non white, non
Australians are creating power and resourses...Our status is becoming
lower....Going to end up poor second class
citizens. You took on the Hindi because they are considered sub human
right? Well bub India is becoming a
economic powerhouse....You and the other drunken white trash down
there might end up as their employee's.
No Union, squat to shit, carrying honey buckets for the other than
whites <eg>

Yet I notice none of you bad mouth China, Australia's biggest danger,
afraid are you? Like a mouse in snake territory....shhhh don/t attract
their attention----Yet I know you hate them just as bad as you do the
Hindu....Fear does strange things to the mind.
Like the old saying, there are no atheist in fox holes----You begin to
pray to a higher power when in danger,
Atheist or not---Man fears death, enslavement and a multitude of other
things. Its the things they normally do
to people they consider substandard---This is what they fear their
self. The worm turning. Hiding behind this alter
ego will do you no good-------->China has their eye on you! Your white
have round eyes, Talk with a accent, can't speak any of their
dialects. So now you are thinking "Well we have a agreement with the
Americans to protect us.
(((GOT NEWS FOR YOU LOOSER)))  Our President is not white ~ !! woo woo
you are fucked ;->

Although we have had our problems with them in the past China has
embraced Capitalism moderated their views toward the USA and is now is
a trade partner......Looking better than the Australians every day, in
every way.
 Ahhhhhhhh can't say the rest of the world is going to miss you or
your back wards country and the white trash it breeds either. ;)P
Re: what ''shit' ' Now the difference between colony's down under and on this side of the Pacific. Anthropological thesis
#2407
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 06:10
88 lines
5706 bytes
On Oct 27, 12:43 am, "Spartan613" <nos...@buggeroff.com> wrote:
> "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in messagenews:c4f14262-1fc7-4690-83b6-cad4ed57e0f7@l8g2000yql.googlegroups.com...
> On Oct 26, 1:48 am, "Spartan613" <nos...@buggeroff.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in
> > messagenews:8289d62b-ecea-45e6-afe6-371ae50a92c8@u10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
> > On Oct 24, 10:29 pm, the unknown flailer <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Oct 22, 2:25 am, "Sunny" <wombatho...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>
> > > > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in
> > > > messagenews:bed1af5a-0b18-4249-b913-aa703d30b17a@p26g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > > Ahhhhh I'm cumming, you made my month woman and BTW Peters enough of a
> > > > schemer to set up fake accounts to fool
> > > > <snip rest of garbage>
>
> > > > ** Are you going through a second childhood, or you just a boofhead ?
>
> > > Dayum I try to be cement good relations between the U.S. & white trash
> > > like the Tas-maniacs and Au-strange-aliens then they get in a snit.
> > > 0~;->
>
> > But thats to be expected, Australia and Tasmania were English prison
> > colony's unlike the U.S. and Canada where
> > furs and crops were paramount or the Caribbean Islands where sugar
> > cane was king...They had to send working types
> > Or indentured servants to North America and slaves to the
> > islands....Australia and Tasmania? Debtors from London jails and
> > prison guards, neither desirable or industrious stock IMHO. Plus
> > Canada had a French English mixture and the U.S.
> > French/English/Spanish and we opened our doors to immigrant's and
> > received rich diversity...Au & Tas? Pretty well closed
> > up, no body of color or with slant eyes was allowed in until only
> > recently at the very end of the 20th century....That sick trash down
> > there is lucky I'm willing to help them with their emotional problems.
> > And the ANZAC? Like most AuTas they talk a good fight but have no ass
> > to back it up....The Turks whipped their ass in WW I and Japan was
> > going to make a colony of white slaves out of them till they made the
> > mistake of attacking Pearl and pissing the U.S. off. So there it is,
>
> > I have a Vietnam foot note, they were involved there as part of the
> > SEATO pack I believe, Sent their best the SAS----I was not impressed,
> > they stayed in their fort
>
> > ************
>
> > Where was this "fort"?
>
> A old French fighting position left over from their colonial rule,
> looked like it had been created by Hollywood for a Beau Gest
> movie only smaller like a Château.
>
> ****
>
> Can you be more specific?
>
> A super-soldier like you would be able to rattle off the MGRS or Lat-Long
> for it, surely?
>
> --
> "God is not on the side of the big battalions, but of those who shoot the
> best". Voltaire..- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

It was not in III Corps, A French style house in a compound with high
walls around it carrying ramparts...Only 4
enlisted ANZACS there, middle aged, flabby, balding NCO's ~pitiful~
They had a lot of beer though, cases of it
stacked head high all around the room they seemed to prefer as a Mess.
Depending on the ARVNS to guard
their gate &  perimeter U.S, units had to patrol their A.O.. I was not
impressed, could have taken it away from them with my boat crews who
were basicall fishermen and ex Indo China pirates. If thats your best
the ChiCom should be able to take Australia 1 2 3 as easy as that. If
you want a job later start learning some Chinese dialects bub is my
best advice.
Re: what ''shit' ' Now if Red China annexe's Australia one Texans opinion ;-)
#2408
Author: Sunny
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:07
6 lines
2280 bytes
"the unknown flailer" <thuythu@iwon.com> wrote in message 
news:aa38326b-0e96-46b0-86e7-2f3c33f37506@30g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
<snip your bullshit>
Talk to a mirror, it may make some sense in what you spruik
Out
Re: what ''shit' ' Now the difference between colony's down under and on this side of the Pacific. Anthropological thesis
#2409
Author: Sunny
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:16
97 lines
6073 bytes
"the unknown flailer" <thuythu@iwon.com> wrote in message 
news:5c26e3c0-cb2a-4d6d-a17e-4f1397480aa0@t20g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 12:43 am, "Spartan613" <nos...@buggeroff.com> wrote:
> "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in 
> messagenews:c4f14262-1fc7-4690-83b6-cad4ed57e0f7@l8g2000yql.googlegroups.com...
> On Oct 26, 1:48 am, "Spartan613" <nos...@buggeroff.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in
> > messagenews:8289d62b-ecea-45e6-afe6-371ae50a92c8@u10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
> > On Oct 24, 10:29 pm, the unknown flailer <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Oct 22, 2:25 am, "Sunny" <wombatho...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>
> > > > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in
> > > > messagenews:bed1af5a-0b18-4249-b913-aa703d30b17a@p26g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > > Ahhhhh I'm cumming, you made my month woman and BTW Peters enough 
> > > > of a
> > > > schemer to set up fake accounts to fool
> > > > <snip rest of garbage>
>
> > > > ** Are you going through a second childhood, or you just a 
> > > > boofhead ?
>
> > > Dayum I try to be cement good relations between the U.S. & white 
> > > trash
> > > like the Tas-maniacs and Au-strange-aliens then they get in a snit.
> > > 0~;->
>
> > But thats to be expected, Australia and Tasmania were English prison
> > colony's unlike the U.S. and Canada where
> > furs and crops were paramount or the Caribbean Islands where sugar
> > cane was king...They had to send working types
> > Or indentured servants to North America and slaves to the
> > islands....Australia and Tasmania? Debtors from London jails and
> > prison guards, neither desirable or industrious stock IMHO. Plus
> > Canada had a French English mixture and the U.S.
> > French/English/Spanish and we opened our doors to immigrant's and
> > received rich diversity...Au & Tas? Pretty well closed
> > up, no body of color or with slant eyes was allowed in until only
> > recently at the very end of the 20th century....That sick trash down
> > there is lucky I'm willing to help them with their emotional problems.
> > And the ANZAC? Like most AuTas they talk a good fight but have no ass
> > to back it up....The Turks whipped their ass in WW I and Japan was
> > going to make a colony of white slaves out of them till they made the
> > mistake of attacking Pearl and pissing the U.S. off. So there it is,
>
> > I have a Vietnam foot note, they were involved there as part of the
> > SEATO pack I believe, Sent their best the SAS----I was not impressed,
> > they stayed in their fort
>
> > ************
>
> > Where was this "fort"?
>
> A old French fighting position left over from their colonial rule,
> looked like it had been created by Hollywood for a Beau Gest
> movie only smaller like a Ch�teau.
>
> ****
>
> Can you be more specific?
>
> A super-soldier like you would be able to rattle off the MGRS or 
> Lat-Long
> for it, surely?
>
> --
> "God is not on the side of the big battalions, but of those who shoot 
> the
> best". Voltaire..- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

It was not in III Corps, A French style house in a compound with high
walls around it carrying ramparts...Only 4
enlisted ANZACS there, middle aged, flabby, balding NCO's ~pitiful~

**********************************
If they were AATTV (Australian Army Trg Team Vietnam they were not NCOs 
they were Warrant Officers Class 2
(The only NCOs were attached to MATT (Teams) and were based at major ARVN 
Trg establishments

They had a lot of beer though, cases of it

****************************************8
I swapped beer with the US Seabee Unit stationed in Baria, two cases of 
Budweiser for one case of Aussie VB.
(My Coy Comd wanted our troops to drink lower alcohol beer)
BTW We never had re-supplies that included beer while on OPs, not like the 
US Infantry and Cav Units we worked with.
Re: what ''shit' ' Now if Red China annexe's Australia one Texans opinion ;-)
#2410
Author: Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 13:45
27 lines
2836 bytes
the unknown flailer wrote:
> On Oct 26, 2:28 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries"
> <rhondaleak...@earthling.net> wrote:
>> Sunny wrote:
>>> "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in message
>>> news:e0689486-8a99-4842-9d32-9770627ba2f2@k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
>>> On Oct 25, 2:38 am, "Sunny" <wombatho...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>>>> "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in
>>>> messagenews:8289d62b-ecea-45e6-afe6-371ae50a92c8@u10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
>>>> <snip rant>
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>> BTW when are you going to realise that the clown that claims to be
>>> Peter Lucas is not him?
>>
>> He knows, but he doesn't care if it will enable him to stir some
>> shit. He'd a good candidate for auk when the lawsuit is over and the
>> FNVW is able to post again.
>
> No lawsuit to it

You have no idea what I'm talking about, so you confabulate some weird 
nonsense to make you seem (to yourself only) that you do.

You should be aware, however, that some of your remarks border on actionable 
libel, and if you get sued, you'll have no one to blame but yourself. 
Re: what ''shit' ' Now the difference between colony's down under and on this side of the Pacific. Anthropological thesis
#2411
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 16:43
148 lines
9091 bytes
On Oct 27, 2:16 am, "Sunny" <wombatho...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in messagenews:5c26e3c0-cb2a-4d6d-a17e-4f1397480aa0@t20g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
> On Oct 27, 12:43 am, "Spartan613" <nos...@buggeroff.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in
> > messagenews:c4f14262-1fc7-4690-83b6-cad4ed57e0f7@l8g2000yql.googlegroups.com...
> > On Oct 26, 1:48 am, "Spartan613" <nos...@buggeroff.com> wrote:
>
> > > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in
> > > messagenews:8289d62b-ecea-45e6-afe6-371ae50a92c8@u10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
> > > On Oct 24, 10:29 pm, the unknown flailer <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Oct 22, 2:25 am, "Sunny" <wombatho...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>
> > > > > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in
> > > > > messagenews:bed1af5a-0b18-4249-b913-aa703d30b17a@p26g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > > > Ahhhhh I'm cumming, you made my month woman and BTW Peters enough
> > > > > of a
> > > > > schemer to set up fake accounts to fool
> > > > > <snip rest of garbage>
>
> > > > > ** Are you going through a second childhood, or you just a
> > > > > boofhead ?
>
> > > > Dayum I try to be cement good relations between the U.S. & white
> > > > trash
> > > > like the Tas-maniacs and Au-strange-aliens then they get in a snit.
> > > > 0~;->
>
> > > But thats to be expected, Australia and Tasmania were English prison
> > > colony's unlike the U.S. and Canada where
> > > furs and crops were paramount or the Caribbean Islands where sugar
> > > cane was king...They had to send working types
> > > Or indentured servants to North America and slaves to the
> > > islands....Australia and Tasmania? Debtors from London jails and
> > > prison guards, neither desirable or industrious stock IMHO. Plus
> > > Canada had a French English mixture and the U.S.
> > > French/English/Spanish and we opened our doors to immigrant's and
> > > received rich diversity...Au & Tas? Pretty well closed
> > > up, no body of color or with slant eyes was allowed in until only
> > > recently at the very end of the 20th century....That sick trash down
> > > there is lucky I'm willing to help them with their emotional problems.
> > > And the ANZAC? Like most AuTas they talk a good fight but have no ass
> > > to back it up....The Turks whipped their ass in WW I and Japan was
> > > going to make a colony of white slaves out of them till they made the
> > > mistake of attacking Pearl and pissing the U.S. off. So there it is,
>
> > > I have a Vietnam foot note, they were involved there as part of the
> > > SEATO pack I believe, Sent their best the SAS----I was not impressed,
> > > they stayed in their fort
>
> > > ************
>
> > > Where was this "fort"?
>
> > A old French fighting position left over from their colonial rule,
> > looked like it had been created by Hollywood for a Beau Gest
> > movie only smaller like a Château.
>
> > ****
>
> > Can you be more specific?
>
> > A super-soldier like you would be able to rattle off the MGRS or
> > Lat-Long
> > for it, surely?
>
> > --
> > "God is not on the side of the big battalions, but of those who shoot
> > the
> > best". Voltaire..- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> It was not in III Corps, A French style house in a compound with high
> walls around it carrying ramparts...Only 4
> enlisted ANZACS there, middle aged, flabby, balding NCO's ~pitiful~
>
> **********************************
> If they were AATTV (Australian Army Trg Team Vietnam they were not NCOs
> they were Warrant Officers Class 2
> (The only NCOs were attached to MATT (Teams) and were based at major ARVN
> Trg establishments
>
> They had a lot of beer though, cases of it
>
> ****************************************8
> I swapped beer with the US Seabee Unit stationed in Baria, two cases of
> Budweiser for one case of Aussie VB.
> (My Coy Comd wanted our troops to drink lower alcohol beer)
> BTW We never had re-supplies that included beer while on OPs, not like the
> US Infantry and Cav Units we worked with.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Booze? We had plenty, every Co Van had a ration card. 6 fifths and so
many cases of beer and cokes a month.
Had to go into Da Nang to get it at the PX. Always a shot up boat that
needed to go in or one that needed a engine replaced. We took turns,
one team member took all 4 ration cards and bought the supply. Not
being big drinkers, we used most of it in trade. Mainly using Air Cav
helicopters like taxi's. A bottle of Scotch could get front door
service
and a lift just about anywhere. We left some with our SK (Supply NCO)
at HQ to grease the supply line between Branch's. He managed to get us
a E model  M60 for the bow of our primary scout boat and cases of LURP
rations on demand, which was a good deal for all of us but especially
our LT. The guy was from a rich Virginia family....Ivy league school
(Spoiled rotten) Couldn't eat bush tucker or local food without
getting sick and of course C rations were heavy and tended to
constipate-----I felt sorry for the poor thing and often took his turn
eating with the Vietnamese Officers--They had a wicked sense of humor
and tried to feed him dog parts, fish heads, monkey brains, goat
eyeballs, chicken and duck feet and various animal guts as were their
custom...Any thing they considered a delicacy was hand fed to a
honored guest to make sure he got some, plenty of Nuc mom on
everything of course. hahahahahaha I loved watching his expression---
To save face, he had to get it down ~but later~, Talk about projectile
vomit. The boy could slump against one wall and hit the opposite wall
in the team room with vomit. We had were tight little field teams, we
protected him as much as we could but he had a weak
constitution.......Could have been at sea eating in the Ward room on
fine China being waited on hand and foot by Stewards Mates but here he
was with a bunch of ruffians trying to tough it out----You had to
respect that, even though he was doing it for combat command showing
in his service records, helping with promotion---The Navy was tough on
Officers at promotion time---They get passed over twice and they were
out----Cut down the dead wood thats for sure but all you needed was
one asshole on the review board that didn't like you and you got
passed over. Of course enlisted ranks were much easier (stay out of
the brig) get recommended for advancement, pass the written when it
came around. Shit I was E-7 or CPO within 9 years A wonderful little
war in my opinion-----I just didn't like killing....Since I respected
the NVA's
determination, toughness and overall tenacity that made it suck even
more. So I just got out when my terms of service were up and became a
man of peace as you can probably tell  0~;->
Re: what ''shit' ' Now if Red China annexe's Australia one Texans opinion ;-) NOW RL flex's the muscle between her ears
#2412
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 17:39
56 lines
4730 bytes
On Oct 27, 8:45 am, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries"
<rhondaleak...@earthling.net> wrote:
> the unknown flailer wrote:
> > On Oct 26, 2:28 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries"
> > <rhondaleak...@earthling.net> wrote:
> >> Sunny wrote:
> >>> "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in message
> >>>news:e0689486-8a99-4842-9d32-9770627ba2f2@k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
> >>> On Oct 25, 2:38 am, "Sunny" <wombatho...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> >>>> "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in
> >>>> messagenews:8289d62b-ecea-45e6-afe6-371ae50a92c8@u10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
> >>>> <snip rant>
>
> >> <snip>
>
> >>> BTW when are you going to realise that the clown that claims to be
> >>> Peter Lucas is not him?
>
> >> He knows, but he doesn't care if it will enable him to stir some
> >> shit. He'd a good candidate for auk when the lawsuit is over and the
> >> FNVW is able to post again.
>
> > No lawsuit to it
>
> You have no idea what I'm talking about, so you confabulate some weird
> nonsense to make you seem (to yourself only) that you do.
>
> You should be aware, however, that some of your remarks border on actionable
> libel, and if you get sued, you'll have no one to blame but yourself.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Its clear you are a Peter Lucas groupie, one of these perverted
Australians is hiding behind the Peter Lucas mask.
And the creator of the persona is a passive aggressive, they are easy
to crack.There is a method to my madness----I have two persons of
interest in the investigation. I see you too are fond of using other
peoples quotes as tag lines, its a form of plagiarism you know...Not
for money but from lack of talent or original thought on the thief's
part. Sue? Let them try it
from across the International date line, or perhaps come here----Texas
really will arrest some of them for buggery and the other perverted
fetish's they display. Not to mention First Amendment rights protect a
lot of my views. I see you posting on the legal group and also the fat
groups----Got a problem hauling your big caboose around sweetie?
<grin> These Ozzies also take their hatred of Indians and and  other
indigenous peoples and the Peter Lucas persona to other groups. Sooooo
jump on your broom and fly your bitchy self away RL DZ style politics
and fear tactics just don't work on me, never did on the DZ, won't
here. Oh and watch stealing talented thinkers quotes. It doesn't make
you look intelligent, just immature with no original thought of your
own!. The advice as always is free. 0~;-*
Re: what ''shit' ' Now if Red China annexe's Australia one Texans opinion ;-)
#2413
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:43
12 lines
2645 bytes
On Oct 27, 2:07 am, "Sunny" <wombatho...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in messagenews:aa38326b-0e96-46b0-86e7-2f3c33f37506@30g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
> <snip your bullshit>
> Talk to a mirror, it may make some sense in what you spruik
> Out

As the song goes "I feel pretty", no need to look in a mirror and only
intellectuals would understand my reasoning and droll
humor.Intellectuals seem to be in short supply down under. But as long
as it pisses the self important and/or trashy personality's off it
works for me.  0~;-)
Re: what ''shit' ' Now if Red China annexe's Australia one Texans opinion ;-)
#2414
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:59
49 lines
4196 bytes
On Oct 27, 8:45 am, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries"
<rhondaleak...@earthling.net> wrote:
> the unknown flailer wrote:
> > On Oct 26, 2:28 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries"
> > <rhondaleak...@earthling.net> wrote:
> >> Sunny wrote:
> >>> "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in message
> >>>news:e0689486-8a99-4842-9d32-9770627ba2f2@k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
> >>> On Oct 25, 2:38 am, "Sunny" <wombatho...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> >>>> "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in
> >>>> messagenews:8289d62b-ecea-45e6-afe6-371ae50a92c8@u10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
> >>>> <snip rant>
>
> >> <snip>
>
> >>> BTW when are you going to realise that the clown that claims to be
> >>> Peter Lucas is not him?
>
> >> He knows, but he doesn't care if it will enable him to stir some
> >> shit. He'd a good candidate for auk when the lawsuit is over and the
> >> FNVW is able to post again.
>
> > No lawsuit to it
>
> You have no idea what I'm talking about, so you confabulate some weird
> nonsense to make you seem (to yourself only) that you do.
>
> You should be aware, however, that some of your remarks border on actionable
> libel, and if you get sued, you'll have no one to blame but yourself.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Dream on woman, can't squeeze blood from a turnip and hurt feelings
have no place in the law. A lot of what I say
is covered by free speech. Ambulance chasers might take a case for a
fee but you and your Peter Lucas fan club
would be bled dry....If the lower court didn't throw it out as a
nuisance case, Appeals court would chunk any judgment
on the First Amendment alone. Then the counter suit for legal fee's.
And some crude Australian from across the pond
wants American justice? Bring the bank whanker. tsk tsk tsk go back to
watching the soap opera's, Divorce court and Judge Judy woman....In
the real world your dreams of grandeur &  profit aspirations don't
fly. You young people are really show your naiveté. A total lack of
good sense, say are you now or have you ever been a blond? ROFL ;)P
Re: what ''shit' ' Now RED ALERT AUSTRALIA ;-)
#2415
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 19:33
16 lines
2938 bytes
On Oct 27, 2:07 am, "Sunny" <-----my main straight man ;-)
snip his injured friends of America spiel

Whoa bub, get on the horn to Krispis and the other whankers......Our
Secretary of State is headed for China for talks.
Is it to protect our Friend Australia? Dunno, Foreign leaders in the
Middle East and Europe call her the bag lady because of her matronly
appearance and dress but don't be fooled she is a tough minded old
girl. Might speak up for yawl but then again she might trade you off
to get Favored trading partner status for the U.S. I know my buddy
Sunny is thinking "No worry mate, we sent troops to Vietnam and
support the US Military effort in other ways." I myself being a old
Veteran thank your country for that gesture. But this is a
female....They tend to have a "What have you done for us lately"
attitude.....I pray for you my drunken brothers, may God be merciful
0~;-*
Re: what ''shit' ' Now if Red China annexe's Australia one Texans opinion ;-)
#2416
Author: Aussie
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 21:09
32 lines
2879 bytes
"Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> wrote in
news:8iqp96F23qU1@mid.individual.net: 

> the unknown flailer wrote:

> 
> You have no idea what I'm talking about, so you confabulate some weird 
> nonsense to make you seem (to yourself only) that you do.
> 
> You should be aware, however, that some of your remarks border on
> actionable libel, and if you get sued, you'll have no one to blame but
> yourself. 
> 
> 



You can't get blood from a stone..... and you can just tell by the bullshit 
it comes out with that the major asset it has in its life is its computer and 
internet access.

I really don't know why people continue to talk to it.



-- 
Peter Lucas                            
Hobart
Tasmania
  	
If riding in an airplane is flying, then riding in a boat is swimming..If you 
want to experience the element, get out of the vehicle !
Re: what ''shit' ' Now if Red China annexe's Australia one Texans opinion ;-)
#2419
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 22:59
36 lines
3821 bytes
On Oct 27, 4:09 pm, Aussie <Aus...@home.upstairs.in.brissie.aus>
wrote:
> "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhondaleak...@earthling.net> wrote innews:8iqp96F23qU1@mid.individual.net:
> > the unknown flailer wrote:
>
> > You have no idea what I'm talking about, so you confabulate some weird
> > nonsense to make you seem (to yourself only) that you do.
>
> > You should be aware, however, that some of your remarks border on
> > actionable libel, and if you get sued, you'll have no one to blame but
> > yourself.
>
> You can't get blood from a stone..... and you can just tell by the bullshit
> it comes out with that the major asset it has in its life is its computer and
> internet access.
>
> I really don't know why people continue to talk to it.
>
> --
Its like getting drunk and doing Jackass things, you know midget
throwing....Jumping over the Bon Fire, trading punches,
lighting farts etc etc etc....I don't expect a woman to understand-----
They got emotions, feelings and shit like that. Besides
it gives me a chance to hoorah the Aussies about Red China and give
them something to think about besides how much beer is left and who's
getting the next one.. Peter is something we have in common (dumb
shit) If our rough talk offends you go back to the kitchen or go iron
and stay out of it, Just don't open and read it. You will never
understand our dumb stuff. And no one is getting sued over Political
views, local or International in the state of Texas. The Peter creator
could do time in Texas for pedophile talk and a few other things if he
was ever caught. Give up and go away. I haven't had to do what a woman
told me or watched what I said since my momma died last century. ;)P
Re: what ''shit' ' Now if Red China annexe's Australia one Texans opinion ;-)
#2428
Author: Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 02:19
29 lines
2639 bytes
Aussie wrote:
> "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> wrote in
> news:8iqp96F23qU1@mid.individual.net:
>
>> the unknown flailer wrote:
>
>>
>> You have no idea what I'm talking about, so you confabulate some
>> weird nonsense to make you seem (to yourself only) that you do.
>>
>> You should be aware, however, that some of your remarks border on
>> actionable libel, and if you get sued, you'll have no one to blame
>> but yourself.
>>
>>
>
>
>
> You can't get blood from a stone..... and you can just tell by the
> bullshit it comes out with that the major asset it has in its life is
> its computer and internet access.

Some states have criminal libel laws.

http://volokh.com/2010/06/08/about-200-criminal-libelslander-convictions-in-virginia-from-2001-to-2008/

> I really don't know why people continue to talk to it.

I want to gag it.
Re: what ''shit' ' Now the difference between colony's down under and on this side of the Pacific. Anthropological thesis
#2430
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 03:05
23 lines
3102 bytes
On Oct 26, 1:54 am, "Spartan613" <nos...@buggeroff.com> wrote:
>thuythu working the muts
> *I say again.  ~NOT IMPRESSED~ Let Red China have Australia and
> *Tasmania too, why should we care? ;-P
>
> You'd care fuckin' heaps if the Commies get their hands on our mountains of
> uranium.
>
> Fuckwit.
>
I love this guy, he's closer to the PRC than Texas is, no chance of a
ChiCom cruiser, missile boat and/or troop transports heaving to of the
Texas coast----If China needs Nuclear power let them have it, can't do
any worse job of it or be more careless than the Australian Government
was...Maybe they can send a delegation over to help yawl keep from
radiating Kangaroo's & Sheep herders---NOK is the one to beware of,
they have missiles that reach Australia and are quite crazy.
These stinking Americans and Australians are Allies yes? Well we can't
strike the U.S. so lets pop one on Australia
just to show the Capitalist pigs in America. Thing to do Spartan is
immigrate west where they can't reach you or else build a fall out
shelter in your back yard! Bwooooooo ha ha ha ;)P
Re: what ''shit' ' Now if Red China annexe's Australia one Texans opinion ;-)
#2431
Author: Aussie
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 03:11
56 lines
3533 bytes
"Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> wrote in
news:8is4ufF1u7U1@mid.individual.net: 

> Aussie wrote:
>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> wrote in
>> news:8iqp96F23qU1@mid.individual.net:
>>
>>> the unknown flailer wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> You have no idea what I'm talking about, so you confabulate some
>>> weird nonsense to make you seem (to yourself only) that you do.
>>>
>>> You should be aware, however, that some of your remarks border on
>>> actionable libel, and if you get sued, you'll have no one to blame
>>> but yourself.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> You can't get blood from a stone..... and you can just tell by the
>> bullshit it comes out with that the major asset it has in its life is
>> its computer and internet access.
> 
> Some states have criminal libel laws.
> 
> http://volokh.com/2010/06/08/about-200-criminal-libelslander-
convictions-
> in-virginia-from-2001-to-2008/ 



Unfortunately, shit-4-brains lives in Texass, IIRC.


> 
>> I really don't know why people continue to talk to it.
> 
> I want to gag it.
> 


The best way to gag it, is killfile it and never 'talk' to it again.

Its not going to stop its puerile shit as long as it has an "audience" to 
play to.


-- 
Peter Lucas                            
Hobart
Tasmania
  	
If riding in an airplane is flying, then riding in a boat is swimming..If 
you want to experience the element, get out of the vehicle !
Re: what ''shit' ' Now if Red China annexe's Australia one Texans opinion ;-)
#2433
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 03:17
49 lines
3398 bytes
On Oct 27, 10:11 pm, Aussie <Aus...@home.upstairs.in.brissie.aus>
wrote:
> "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhondaleak...@earthling.net> wrote innews:8is4ufF1u7U1@mid.individual.net:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Aussie wrote:
> >> "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhondaleak...@earthling.net> wrote in
> >>news:8iqp96F23qU1@mid.individual.net:
>
> >>> the unknown flailer wrote:
>
> >>> You have no idea what I'm talking about, so you confabulate some
> >>> weird nonsense to make you seem (to yourself only) that you do.
>
> >>> You should be aware, however, that some of your remarks border on
> >>> actionable libel, and if you get sued, you'll have no one to blame
> >>> but yourself.
>
> >> You can't get blood from a stone..... and you can just tell by the
> >> bullshit it comes out with that the major asset it has in its life is
> >> its computer and internet access.
>
> > Some states have criminal libel laws.
>
> >http://volokh.com/2010/06/08/about-200-criminal-libelslander-
> convictions-
> > in-virginia-from-2001-to-2008/
>
> Unfortunately, shit-4-brains lives in Texass, IIRC.
>
>
>
> >> I really don't know why people continue to talk to it.
>
> > I want to gag it.
>
> The best way to gag it, is killfile it and never 'talk' to it again.
>
- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Gee I think she loves me ;-)
Re: what ''shit' ' Now if Red China annexe's Australia one Texans opinion ;-)
#2434
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 03:22
30 lines
3106 bytes
On Oct 27, 9:19 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries"
<rhondaleak...@earthling.net> wrote:
> Aussie wrote:
> > "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhondaleak...@earthling.net> wrote in
> >news:8iqp96F23qU1@mid.individual.net:
>
> >> the unknown flailer wrote:
>
> >> You have no idea what I'm talking about, so you confabulate some
> >> weird nonsense to make you seem (to yourself only) that you do.
>
> >> You should be aware, however, that some of your remarks border on
> >> actionable libel, and if you get sued, you'll have no one to blame
> >> but yourself.
>
> > You can't get blood from a stone..... and you can just tell by the
> > bullshit it comes out with that the major asset it has in its life is
> > its computer and internet access.
>
> Some states have criminal libel laws.
>
> http://volokh.com/2010/06/08/about-200-criminal-libelslander-convicti...
>
> > I really don't know why people continue to talk to it.
>
> I want to gag it.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Take a pill woman ~ smootchie bootchie
Re: what ''shit' ' Now the difference between colony's down under and on this side of the Pacific. Anthropological thesis
#2439
Author: Spartan613
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 08:36
107 lines
6481 bytes
"the unknown flailer" <thuythu@iwon.com> wrote in message 
news:5c26e3c0-cb2a-4d6d-a17e-4f1397480aa0@t20g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 12:43 am, "Spartan613" <nos...@buggeroff.com> wrote:
> "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in 
> messagenews:c4f14262-1fc7-4690-83b6-cad4ed57e0f7@l8g2000yql.googlegroups.com...
> On Oct 26, 1:48 am, "Spartan613" <nos...@buggeroff.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in
> > messagenews:8289d62b-ecea-45e6-afe6-371ae50a92c8@u10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
> > On Oct 24, 10:29 pm, the unknown flailer <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Oct 22, 2:25 am, "Sunny" <wombatho...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>
> > > > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in
> > > > messagenews:bed1af5a-0b18-4249-b913-aa703d30b17a@p26g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > > Ahhhhh I'm cumming, you made my month woman and BTW Peters enough of 
> > > > a
> > > > schemer to set up fake accounts to fool
> > > > <snip rest of garbage>
>
> > > > ** Are you going through a second childhood, or you just a boofhead 
> > > > ?
>
> > > Dayum I try to be cement good relations between the U.S. & white trash
> > > like the Tas-maniacs and Au-strange-aliens then they get in a snit.
> > > 0~;->
>
> > But thats to be expected, Australia and Tasmania were English prison
> > colony's unlike the U.S. and Canada where
> > furs and crops were paramount or the Caribbean Islands where sugar
> > cane was king...They had to send working types
> > Or indentured servants to North America and slaves to the
> > islands....Australia and Tasmania? Debtors from London jails and
> > prison guards, neither desirable or industrious stock IMHO. Plus
> > Canada had a French English mixture and the U.S.
> > French/English/Spanish and we opened our doors to immigrant's and
> > received rich diversity...Au & Tas? Pretty well closed
> > up, no body of color or with slant eyes was allowed in until only
> > recently at the very end of the 20th century....That sick trash down
> > there is lucky I'm willing to help them with their emotional problems.
> > And the ANZAC? Like most AuTas they talk a good fight but have no ass
> > to back it up....The Turks whipped their ass in WW I and Japan was
> > going to make a colony of white slaves out of them till they made the
> > mistake of attacking Pearl and pissing the U.S. off. So there it is,
>
> > I have a Vietnam foot note, they were involved there as part of the
> > SEATO pack I believe, Sent their best the SAS----I was not impressed,
> > they stayed in their fort
>
> > ************
>
> > Where was this "fort"?
>
> A old French fighting position left over from their colonial rule,
> looked like it had been created by Hollywood for a Beau Gest
> movie only smaller like a Ch�teau.
>
> ****
>
> Can you be more specific?
>
> A super-soldier like you would be able to rattle off the MGRS or Lat-Long
> for it, surely?
>
> --
> "God is not on the side of the big battalions, but of those who shoot the
> best". Voltaire..- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

It was not in III Corps, A French style house in a compound with high
walls around it carrying ramparts...Only 4
enlisted ANZACS there, middle aged, flabby, balding NCO's ~pitiful~
They had a lot of beer though, cases of it
stacked head high all around the room they seemed to prefer as a Mess.
Depending on the ARVNS to guard
their gate &  perimeter U.S, units had to patrol their A.O.. I was not
impressed, could have taken it away from them with my boat crews who
were basicall fishermen and ex Indo China pirates. If thats your best
the ChiCom should be able to take Australia 1 2 3 as easy as that. If
you want a job later start learning some Chinese dialects bub is my
best advice.

*********

Dumb cunt, aren't you?

I asked you where the place was, and you tell me where it wasn't.

You then proceed to tell me about who was living there. Another question I 
didn't ask and have no interest in.

So not only are you as dumb as dog-shit, you're in all likelihood a liar as 
well.

Now, what are you?

(Hint: look up the top there).

-- 
"God is not on the side of the big battalions, but of those who shoot the 
best". Voltaire..
Re: what ''shit' ' Now if Red China annexe's Australia one Texans opinion ;-)
#2440
Author: Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 12:41
55 lines
3415 bytes
Aussie wrote:
> "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> wrote in
> news:8is4ufF1u7U1@mid.individual.net:
>
>> Aussie wrote:
>>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> wrote in
>>> news:8iqp96F23qU1@mid.individual.net:
>>>
>>>> the unknown flailer wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> You have no idea what I'm talking about, so you confabulate some
>>>> weird nonsense to make you seem (to yourself only) that you do.
>>>>
>>>> You should be aware, however, that some of your remarks border on
>>>> actionable libel, and if you get sued, you'll have no one to blame
>>>> but yourself.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> You can't get blood from a stone..... and you can just tell by the
>>> bullshit it comes out with that the major asset it has in its life
>>> is its computer and internet access.
>>
>> Some states have criminal libel laws.
>>
>> http://volokh.com/2010/06/08/about-200-criminal-libelslander-
>> convictions- in-virginia-from-2001-to-2008/
>
>
>
> Unfortunately, shit-4-brains lives in Texass, IIRC.
>
>
>>
>>> I really don't know why people continue to talk to it.
>>
>> I want to gag it.
>>
>
>
> The best way to gag it, is killfile it and never 'talk' to it again.

That won't happen, actually. Several of us have made that suggestion in the 
past.

There was a guy in sci.space.history who was killfiled en masse, so he 
posted and replied to himself. Snuffy is just as crazy as he was.

> Its not going to stop its puerile shit as long as it has an
> "audience" to play to.

No, it's just not going to stop, period. 
Re: what ''shit' ' Now the difference between colony's down under and on this side of the Pacific. Anthropological thesis
#2441
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 12:55
129 lines
7261 bytes
On Oct 28, 3:36 am, "Spartan613" <nos...@buggeroff.com> wrote:
> "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in messagenews:5c26e3c0-cb2a-4d6d-a17e-4f1397480aa0@t20g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
> On Oct 27, 12:43 am, "Spartan613" <nos...@buggeroff.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in
> > messagenews:c4f14262-1fc7-4690-83b6-cad4ed57e0f7@l8g2000yql.googlegroups.com...
> > On Oct 26, 1:48 am, "Spartan613" <nos...@buggeroff.com> wrote:
>
> > > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in
> > > messagenews:8289d62b-ecea-45e6-afe6-371ae50a92c8@u10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
> > > On Oct 24, 10:29 pm, the unknown flailer <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Oct 22, 2:25 am, "Sunny" <wombatho...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>
> > > > > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in
> > > > > messagenews:bed1af5a-0b18-4249-b913-aa703d30b17a@p26g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > > > Ahhhhh I'm cumming, you made my month woman and BTW Peters enough of
> > > > > a
> > > > > schemer to set up fake accounts to fool
> > > > > <snip rest of garbage>
>
> > > > > ** Are you going through a second childhood, or you just a boofhead
> > > > > ?
>
> > > > Dayum I try to be cement good relations between the U.S. & white trash
> > > > like the Tas-maniacs and Au-strange-aliens then they get in a snit.
> > > > 0~;->
>
> > > But thats to be expected, Australia and Tasmania were English prison
> > > colony's unlike the U.S. and Canada where
> > > furs and crops were paramount or the Caribbean Islands where sugar
> > > cane was king...They had to send working types
> > > Or indentured servants to North America and slaves to the
> > > islands....Australia and Tasmania? Debtors from London jails and
> > > prison guards, neither desirable or industrious stock IMHO. Plus
> > > Canada had a French English mixture and the U.S.
> > > French/English/Spanish and we opened our doors to immigrant's and
> > > received rich diversity...Au & Tas? Pretty well closed
> > > up, no body of color or with slant eyes was allowed in until only
> > > recently at the very end of the 20th century....That sick trash down
> > > there is lucky I'm willing to help them with their emotional problems.
> > > And the ANZAC? Like most AuTas they talk a good fight but have no ass
> > > to back it up....The Turks whipped their ass in WW I and Japan was
> > > going to make a colony of white slaves out of them till they made the
> > > mistake of attacking Pearl and pissing the U.S. off. So there it is,
>
> > > I have a Vietnam foot note, they were involved there as part of the
> > > SEATO pack I believe, Sent their best the SAS----I was not impressed,
> > > they stayed in their fort
>
> > > ************
>
> > > Where was this "fort"?
>
> > A old French fighting position left over from their colonial rule,
> > looked like it had been created by Hollywood for a Beau Gest
> > movie only smaller like a Château.
>
> > ****
>
> > Can you be more specific?
>
> > A super-soldier like you would be able to rattle off the MGRS or Lat-Long
> > for it, surely?
>
> > --
> > "God is not on the side of the big battalions, but of those who shoot the
> > best". Voltaire..- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> It was not in III Corps, A French style house in a compound with high
> walls around it carrying ramparts...Only 4
> enlisted ANZACS there, middle aged, flabby, balding NCO's ~pitiful~
> They had a lot of beer though, cases of it
> stacked head high all around the room they seemed to prefer as a Mess.
> Depending on the ARVNS to guard
> their gate &  perimeter U.S, units had to patrol their A.O.. I was not
> impressed, could have taken it away from them with my boat crews who
> were basically fishermen and ex Indo China pirates. If thats your best
> the ChiCom should be able to take Australia 1 2 3 as easy as that. If
> you want a job later start learning some Chinese dialects bub is my
> best advice.
>
> *********
>
> Dumb cunt, aren't you?
>
> I asked you where the place was, and you tell me where it wasn't.
>
> You then proceed to tell me about who was living there. Another question I
> didn't ask and have no interest in.
>
> So not only are you as dumb as dog-shit, you're in all likelihood a liar as
> well.
>
> Now, what are you?
>
> (Hint: look up the top there).
>
> - Show quoted text -

I was there, you apparently weren't.....Australia didn't have a big
presence, Thank God drunk as they were. Setting around their compound
shit faced before noon....No wonder the old bastards didn't get
outside the compound much. Ah well the
war was lost---A few ANZAC troops could make no difference anyway
drunk or otherwise. Now yawl expect us to keep China out of Australia?
Lots of luck.  Don't even know where all the ANZAC presence was, III
Corps one of you said. Bzzzt wrong but I'm sure where ever the rest of
ANZAC was they were drunk and stumbling around. Just another burden
for some American fighting man to carry. .;-P
Re: what ''shit' ' Now who is Peter Lucas?
#2444
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:34
44 lines
3736 bytes
On Oct 27, 12:45 am, "Spartan613" <nos...@buggeroff.com> wrote:
> "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in messagenews:f5ac4a9f-3a31-47ed-948a-7d0b512e5bf5@a36g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
> On Oct 26, 1:48 am, "Spartan613" <nos...@buggeroff.com> wrote:
>
> > you.
>
> > --
> > "God is not on the side of the big battalions, but of those who shoot the
> > best". Voltaire..
>
> The cluck that fabricates that Peter Lucas crap is inclined to add tag
> lines also, makes you look like a suspect
> I notice you have more than one account also-----tsk tsk tsk. I begin
> to understand how Australia was dumb enough
> to sign a ANUS agreement with the United States now. Not enough
> Preparation H in the world to cover that mate! ;)P
>
> ***********
>
> Are you talking to;
>
> A. Peter Lucas,
>
> B. Me,
>
> C. The voices in your head.
>
> --
Who cares as long as I have some Australian cornered and crying. And
about that fall out shelter you need in your back yard, that will only
work for a NOK missile attack. The NOK don't have the resources for a
mass Amphibious landing or Air assault. Wouldn't do it anyway because
the American and South Korean Army's are setting right on the 38th
parallel, they need the troops at home. If its the ChiCom coming the
bomb shelter is no good because they are going to send troops in to
stick a bayonet up your backside and move you along to the re
education camp to learn the new form of Government in Canberra....I'll
be setting in my Rocking Chair out on the front porch here in Texas
with my 30/30 leaning against the rail, a drink of some kind in my
hand--Thinking of you all....Gee we aught to go down there and save
those sissy's but I got to watch the still pressure and guard the
garden against varmints! ;-) YeeeeeeHA
Re: what ''shit' ' Now if Red China annexe's Australia one Texans opinion ;-) & RL's time of the month
#2445
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:44
47 lines
3718 bytes
On Oct 27, 8:45 am, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries"
<rhondaleak...@earthling.net> wrote:
> the unknown flailer wrote:
> > On Oct 26, 2:28 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries"
> > <rhondaleak...@earthling.net> wrote:
> >> Sunny wrote:
> >>> "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in message
> >>>news:e0689486-8a99-4842-9d32-9770627ba2f2@k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
> >>> On Oct 25, 2:38 am, "Sunny" <wombatho...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> >>>> "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in
> >>>> messagenews:8289d62b-ecea-45e6-afe6-371ae50a92c8@u10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
> >>>> <snip rant>
>
> >> <snip>
>
> >>> BTW when are you going to realise that the clown that claims to be
> >>> Peter Lucas is not him?
>
> >> He knows, but he doesn't care

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Never truer words
written~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~




>
> You have no idea what I'm talking about, so you confabulate some weird
> nonsense to make you seem (to yourself only) that you do.
>
> You should be aware, however, that some of your remarks border on actionable
> libel, and if you get sued, you'll have no one to blame but yourself.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

TALK ABOUT? All you do is set around and bitch woman, if you don't
like what you are reading (((DON'T OPEN IT)))

Dasn't do that huh------We might talk about you. I've been around a
long time RL, I remember when you and that damn Russian were sexing
each other up, I remember when you broke your Fumar cause you can't
land worth a shit.
That why you ride a broom now Witchie poo? ;-*
Re: what ''shit' ' Now if Red China annexe's Australia one Texans opinion ;-)
#2446
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:47
58 lines
3713 bytes
On Oct 27, 10:11 pm, Aussie <Aus...@home.upstairs.in.brissie.aus>
wrote:
> "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhondaleak...@earthling.net> wrote innews:8is4ufF1u7U1@mid.individual.net:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Aussie wrote:
> >> "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhondaleak...@earthling.net> wrote in
> >>news:8iqp96F23qU1@mid.individual.net:
>
> >>> the unknown flailer wrote:
>
> >>> You have no idea what I'm talking about, so you confabulate some
> >>> weird nonsense to make you seem (to yourself only) that you do.
>
> >>> You should be aware, however, that some of your remarks border on
> >>> actionable libel, and if you get sued, you'll have no one to blame
> >>> but yourself.
>
> >> You can't get blood from a stone..... and you can just tell by the
> >> bullshit it comes out with that the major asset it has in its life is
> >> its computer and internet access.
>
> > Some states have criminal libel laws.
>
> >http://volokh.com/2010/06/08/about-200-criminal-libelslander-
> convictions-
> > in-virginia-from-2001-to-2008/
>
> Unfortunately, shit-4-brains lives in Texass, IIRC.
>
>
>
> >> I really don't know why people continue to talk to it.
>
> > I want to gag it.
>
> The best way to gag it, is killfile it and never 'talk' to it again.
>
>
> --
> Peter Lucas                            
> Hobart
> Tasmania
>
> If riding in an airplane is flying, then riding in a boat is swimming..If
> you want to experience the element, get out of the vehicle !- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

She can't----I have the President of your fan club in the palm of my
hand. ;-)
Re: what ''shit' ' Now the difference between colony's down under and on this side of the Pacific. Anthropological thesis
#2394
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:49
108 lines
6354 bytes
On Oct 28, 3:36 am, "Spartan613" <nos...@buggeroff.com> wrote:
> "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in messagenews:5c26e3c0-cb2a-4d6d-a17e-4f1397480aa0@t20g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
> On Oct 27, 12:43 am, "Spartan613" <nos...@buggeroff.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in
> > messagenews:c4f14262-1fc7-4690-83b6-cad4ed57e0f7@l8g2000yql.googlegroups.com...
> > On Oct 26, 1:48 am, "Spartan613" <nos...@buggeroff.com> wrote:
>
> > > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in
> > > messagenews:8289d62b-ecea-45e6-afe6-371ae50a92c8@u10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
> > > On Oct 24, 10:29 pm, the unknown flailer <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Oct 22, 2:25 am, "Sunny" <wombatho...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>
> > > > > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in
> > > > > messagenews:bed1af5a-0b18-4249-b913-aa703d30b17a@p26g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > > > Ahhhhh I'm cumming, you made my month woman and BTW Peters enough of
> > > > > a
> > > > > schemer to set up fake accounts to fool
> > > > > <snip rest of garbage>
>
> > > > > ** Are you going through a second childhood, or you just a boofhead
> > > > > ?
>
> > > > Dayum I try to be cement good relations between the U.S. & white trash
> > > > like the Tas-maniacs and Au-strange-aliens then they get in a snit.
> > > > 0~;->
>
> > > But thats to be expected, Australia and Tasmania were English prison
> > > colony's unlike the U.S. and Canada where
> > > furs and crops were paramount or the Caribbean Islands where sugar
> > > cane was king...They had to send working types
> > > Or indentured servants to North America and slaves to the
> > > islands....Australia and Tasmania? Debtors from London jails and
> > > prison guards, neither desirable or industrious stock IMHO. Plus
> > > Canada had a French English mixture and the U.S.
> > > French/English/Spanish and we opened our doors to immigrant's and
> > > received rich diversity...Au & Tas? Pretty well closed
> > > up, no body of color or with slant eyes was allowed in until only
> > > recently at the very end of the 20th century....That sick trash down
> > > there is lucky I'm willing to help them with their emotional problems.
> > > And the ANZAC? Like most AuTas they talk a good fight but have no ass
> > > to back it up....The Turks whipped their ass in WW I and Japan was
> > > going to make a colony of white slaves out of them till they made the
> > > mistake of attacking Pearl and pissing the U.S. off. So there it is,
>
> > > I have a Vietnam foot note, they were involved there as part of the
> > > SEATO pack I believe, Sent their best the SAS----I was not impressed,
> > > they stayed in their fort
>
> > > ************
>
> > > Where was this "fort"?
>
> > A old French fighting position left over from their colonial rule,
> > looked like it had been created by Hollywood for a Beau Gest
> > movie only smaller like a Château.
>
> > ****
>
> > Can you be more specific?
>
> > A super-soldier like you would be able to rattle off the MGRS or Lat-Long
> > for it, surely?
>
> > --
> > "God is not on the side of the big battalions, but of those who shoot the
> > best". Voltaire..- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> It was not in III Corps, A French style house in a compound with high
> walls around it carrying ramparts...Only 4
> enlisted ANZACS there, middle aged, flabby, balding NCO's ~pitiful~
> They had a lot of beer though, cases of it
> stacked head high all around the room they seemed to prefer as a Mess.
> Depending on the ARVNS to guard
> their gate &  perimeter U.S, units had to patrol their A.O.. I was not
> impressed, could have taken it away from them with my boat crews who
> were basicall fishermen and ex Indo China pirates. If thats your best
> the ChiCom should be able to take Australia 1 2 3 as easy as that. If
> you want a job later start learning some Chinese dialects bub is my
> best advice.
>
> *********
>
> Dumb cunt, aren't you?
>
 Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Better than being Australian and living without a clue. 0~;->
Re: what ''shit' ' Now concerns for Pacific Rim peace and solving Peters sanitary dilemma
#2396
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:28
13 lines
2183 bytes
On Oct 22, 9:18 am, Krypsis <kryp...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>
>
> At 73, I qualify as "there half a century ago" as well. So what?
>
> Krypsis- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Beautiful------Well being Austalian you were probably so drunk you had
no idea where "there" was. If you found any loose wool in your drawers
I wouldn't be surprised. Damn what a Whanker....I bet the Queens proud
0~;-*
Re: what ''shit' ' Now the difference between colony's down under and on this side of the Pacific. Anthropological thesis
#2397
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:31
22 lines
2869 bytes
On Oct 25, 2:38 am, "Sunny" <wombatho...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in messagenews:8289d62b-ecea-45e6-afe6-371ae50a92c8@u10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
> <snip rant>
> I have a Vietnam foot note, they were involved there as part of the
> SEATO pack I believe, Sent their best the SAS----I was not impressed,
> they stayed in their fort and bad mouthed the USMC
> <snip>
>
> Your involvement in SVN was .....................?
> Read some History, instead of inventing your own.
> As well as SASR we had a Task Force of 6000 Infantry (Rotated 9 Bns each 3
> years) and The AATV (Trg Team)
> Your US Commander gave us the main responsibility for 3 Corps area (look
> it up on a Map)
> I was an Infantry Coy CSM with 8 Bn RAR on combat operations in SVN
> 1969-1970 and worked with a lot of US Army, Navy Engineers, Artillery, and
> Air Force.
 Kind of important for a private weren't you?      (((((((((((NOT
IMPRESSED)))))))))))
Re: what ''shit' ' Now if Red China annexe's Australia one Texans opinion ;-)
#2398
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:46
37 lines
3625 bytes
On Oct 25, 6:04 pm, "Sunny" <wombatho...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in messagenews:e0689486-8a99-4842-9d32-9770627ba2f2@k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
> On Oct 25, 2:38 am, "Sunny" <wombatho...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>
> > "the unknown flailer" <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote in
> > messagenews:8289d62b-ecea-45e6-afe6-371ae50a92c8@u10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
> > <snip rant>
> > I have a Vietnam foot note, they were involved there as part of the
> > SEATO pack I believe, Sent their best the SAS----I was not impressed,
> > they stayed in their fort and bad mouthed the USMC
> > <snip>
>
> You believe wrong it is the ANZUS pact, Australia is not part of SEATO
>
>
>
> > Your involvement in SVN was .....................?
>
> 3 times during the 1960's the last ending July 1970 And this
> philosophy of mine about the PRC annexing Australia is valid.
> <snip>
> Why am I not surprised that you would twist out of ANZUS.
>
> BTW when are you going to realise that the clown that claims to be Peter
> Lucas is not him?

Doesn't matter does it, we took the thread away from his creator? The
mook has to struggle to get a post in edge wise.
And we got your ANUS covered mutton eater, eyes front! "Anchors away
my boys, Anchors away" We are pulling into an Australian port, keep
your flap buttoned,  up and your billfold under your jumper. Don't tie
your kerchief with a slip knot----ANZAC will be lurking about in the
Alleyways begging for beer and looking for fights. Dumber than a bunch
of Marines woo woo Stand Navy down the field and whip them all, Whip
them all ~ they can't fight!.  0~;->
Re: what ''shit' ' Now the sheepmens fear
#2399
Author: the unknown flailer
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:57
19 lines
2776 bytes
On Oct 27, 10:05 pm, the unknown flailer <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote:
> On Oct 26, 1:54 am, "Spartan613" <nos...@buggeroff.com> wrote:>thuythu working the muts
> > *I say again.  ~NOT IMPRESSED~ Let Red China have Australia and
> > *Tasmania too, why should we care? ;-P
>
> > You'd care fuckin' heaps if the Commies get their hands on our mountains of
> > uranium.
>
> > Fuckwit.

I struggle to understand why the U.S. should care about Red China
getting a mountain of uranium. Although their style of Government is
Communist, it is a stable Government that encourages Capitalism. You
Whankers are paranoid. Of course,
being that close and not having slant eyes nor a strong Army could be
unnerving I reckon, have another beer and don't worry about it. Texas
isn't.. <g>
Page 1 of 2 • 83 total messages
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads