Article View: rec.video
Article #5272Re: Advice on Television Repair in SF Requested
From: John Eisenman
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 1998 00:00
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 1998 00:00
53 lines
2865 bytes
2865 bytes
In article <35C77E95.68A@hotmail.com>, marvin_d_c@hotmail.com writes: |> |> you asked for opinions, so here's mine.... |> |> Repairing consumer TVs and VCRs is almost always a waste of your time |> and money. Even IF you can find a reliable repair shop, the cost of most |> repairs will be a significant portion of the cost of a new unit. |> Besides, once you've repaired your 11-year old TV, it will still be 11 |> years old; something else could go wrong with it the next day. Besides |> that, there have been technical improvements during that time, so why |> not take advantage of them? I would guess that that is generally the rule with regard to consumer appliances. |> |> I'd suggest you look around for an inexpensive 25" or even 27" TV, which |> will probably be $200-300 depending on where you shop. For your money, |> you'll get stereo sound, bright picture, full remote control, |> cable-ready, and whatever else. Use it until the digital TVs become |> widely available, then move it to another room and keep it for backup! Well, that's still $200 more than repairing the old set. My eleven year old set includes the features listed above; of course, it was a good deal more expensive at the time. When my set last had problems (2.5 years ago), I did shop around. I was not impressed by the sets in that price range. My old set had a much better picture. Maybe things have improved in the last couple of years, but then, the under $300 27" price range was junk. It seemed that a good set still started at around $500-$600 and went up from there. Maybe it's time to shop again, but I might rather pay another $100 to carry me over the next couple of years until it's time for the new technology. |> |> The only exceptions to the above suggestion are repairing a unit that's |> still in warranty, or repairing one that was EXTREMELY expensive, and is |> still fairly new. Otherwise, buy new!! Mine doesn't fall into the above, but I'd rather not shop around for something new at this time, and I care about quality too much to buy something that might not measure up. -- John Eisenman (jice@sgi.com) Silicon Graphics Computer Systems MS 7U-553 2011 N. Shoreline Blvd. P.O. Box 7311 Mt. View, CA 94039-7311 (650) 933-1551 (650) 932-1551 (fax)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<6q7rds$1m6as@fido.engr.sgi.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<6q6b7i$1b9jk@fido.engr.sgi.com> <35C77E95.68A@hotmail.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f824f,93d6753b642b012d X-Google-Attributes: gidf824f,public X-Google-Thread: f9270,93d6753b642b012d X-Google-Attributes: gidf9270,public From: jice@werx.engr.sgi.com (John Eisenman) Subject: Re: Advice on Television Repair in SF Requested Date: 1998/08/04 Message-ID: <6q7rds$1m6as@fido.engr.sgi.com> X-Deja-AN: 377941160 References: <6q6b7i$1b9jk@fido.engr.sgi.com> <35C77E95.68A@hotmail.com> Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc. Newsgroups: rec.video,ba.general