🚀 go-pugleaf

Thanks, H.B., for a breath of fresh air...

In article <31E78BE9.E2C@inter.net.il>, H. Brandys says...
>
>Ian L. Renert wrote:
>> 
>> For a variety of reasons, government organisations, primarily within the
>> U.S. are not anxious for the conventional investment manager to become
>> familiar with a legitimate market for irrevocable, unconditional bank
>> obligations.  There is a fear or perception that if too many people come
>> to believe that such a market is TRULY real, that it would cause havoc
>> with the financial markets as large sums would exit the traditional
>> markets for what may be a superior opportunity.
>> 
>> The government likes to repeat a limited number of news stories about
>> investors who have been scammed in this market.  While it is unfortunate
>> for anyone who has been scammed, it is hardly unusual to find scamsters.
>>  They are everywhere to be found.
>> 
>> If you have an interest in understanding what the REAL market for bank
>> instruments is all about, it is there to be read and understood.
>> 
>> Refer to http://www.standbyloc.com
>> 
>> EVERY STATEMENT REFERENCES EITHER A LEGAL PRECEDENT, OPINION, RESEARCH
>> REPORT OR OTHER TYPE OF DOCUMENT ISSUED BY AUTHORITATIVE FIGURES IN LAW,
>> BANKING AND GOVERNMENT.  THERE IS NOTHING TO CHALLENGE - THAT IS, AFTER
>> YOU READ THE RESEARCH.
>
>Under no circumstances get yourselves into such a scheme. From personal 
>experience and from others I learned the hard way. All the experts 
>writing articles are anonymous, all letters are fax or copy or part 
>deleted. For everybody info, the Federal Reserve Bank (you know this 
>little bank in D.C) emphatically announce that there is no term or 
>instrument such as Prime Bank Guarantee.
>There is no reason or logic in the world that a bank will pay more then 
>the interbank rake for a loan it wishes to get. Off balance sheet 
>finance is done in a different way, for example securitisation of: 
>mortgage, car loan, credit card loans etc.