🚀 go-pugleaf

LeRoy Blue <leroyblue@billon.net> writes:

> On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:54:51 -0800, nobody@nospam.pacbell.net (Bill
> Z.) wrote:
>
>>LeRoy Blue <leroyblue@billon.net> writes:

>>
>>Look moron, it is not a "fallacy" to point out that you were misusing
>>statistics. All you had to do to avoid criticism is to provide
>>accurate and appropriate numbers.  For some reason, you can't do that
>>and instead continually exaggerate, which is not necessary.  If you
>>had been honest, you'd have said that 48% of the cummulative AIDS
>>cases since the start of the epidemic are known to have resulted from
>>male-to-male sexual contact.  It's 48% instead of 70% due to the 48%
>>number including women, and more straight women than straight men are
>>infected.  You can also admit that male-to-male sexual contact includes
>>not only homosexuals - bisexuals, straight guys who "experiment", and
>>rape victims (e.g., in prison) are all in that category.
>>
>>Why do you have to lie so much?  If you simply told the truth, you'd
>>still have rates that would make most readers nervous.  All your
>>exagerations do is to reduce your credibility to zero, as do your
>>paranoid delusions about "Dogma".
>
>
> As usual you refuse to acknowledge the truth about male homosexuals
> and their knowing and willful spread of HIV/AIDS in the us. Homosexual
> males account for 70% of all AIDS case among males in the US and 50%
> of all cases male and female.

Well, you are still being dishonest because (a) the "male-to-male
sexual contact" catagory includes more than just homosexuals and
(b) nobody knows if people in  "male-to-male sexual contact AND
IV drug use catagory" got it from sex or from drug use (specifically,
what the percentages are).

As I said, there is really no reason for you to lie about it (your
70% BTW, required some round-up with worst-case assumptions).

Why not just admit what the actual numbers are?  That isn't asking
a lot from you.

<rest ignored>.