🚀 go-pugleaf

LeRoy Blue <leroyblue@billon.net> writes:

> On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 14:14:31 -0800, nobody@nospam.pacbell.net (Bill
> Z.) wrote:
>
>>LeRoy Blue <leroyblue@billon.net> writes:
>>
>>> On Thu, 04 Dec 2008 23:43:19 -0800, nobody@nospam.pacbell.net (Bill
>>> Z.) wrote:
>>>
>>>>Actually, you've just shown that you are a mindless, worthless bigot,
>>>>obviously the one with an agenda. 
>>>
>>> OMG! How ironic that is coming from a placard waving homosexuals.
>>
>>Another bigoted idiot who pretends that anyone who posts factual
>>material (in this case merely pointing out that there is more than one
>>way of transmitting a particular virus and that some of those ways
>>also impact heterosexual couples) must be gay. Even funnier, the only
>>"placard waving" was on the part of this bigot and his new-found
>>male(?) friend.  
>>
>>I guess he doesn't have any straight friends or children - most people
>>would want to make sure their friends and children were getting
>>factually accurate information. Instead, he subscribes to the
>>"Arkansas School of Sex Education", named after an Art Hoppe column
>>about sex education where Hoppe very humorously described the first
>>date that his mythical "Cousin Malphasia from Arkansas" went on.  The
>>boy she went out with gave her a kiss, and she said, "Oh no! Now I'll
>>get pregnant".  The boy said, "There's one way to fix it." And he did.
>>Hoppe's wonderful sense of humor aside, it was a serious point: if you
>>don't give people accurate information, they'll pick up what they know
>>from people who know even less than they do and really get themselves
>>into trouble.
>
> Do you find fault with information on HIV/AIDS prevention and control
> published by the U.S Center for Disease Control (CDC)? <snip>

You mean you don't have an answer? I guess you don't have any straight
friends or any children because you show zero interest in the safety
of either.

The issue is merely one of providing factually accurate information.
You don't want someone reading something and taking risks because
of mistakenly thinking there is no risk at all.  I might add that the
the data on the CDC web site agrees with what I posted: otherwise
you'd have no risk at all for heterosexual transmission and that
simply is not the case.

So, why don't you crawl back under a rock and not come back until you
are willing to have an intelligent conversation?