🚀 go-pugleaf

kujebak <kujebak@eudoramail.com> writes:

> On Nov 3, 10:07 am, nob...@nospam.pacbell.net (Bill Z.) wrote:
>> kujebak <kuje...@eudoramail.com> writes:
>> > On Nov 2, 7:12 pm, nob...@nospam.pacbell.net (Bill Z.) wrote:
>> >> kujebak <kuje...@eudoramail.com> writes:
>> >> > On Nov 2, 12:31 pm, nob...@nospam.pacbell.net (Bill Z.) wrote:
>> >> >> Bogus argument - we weren't talking about who had "the ultimate power
>> >> >> to decide" but rather whether civil unions are equivalent to marriage
>> >> >> as a matter of fact.
>> >> Irrelevant - we were discussing whether or not marriage and
>> >> domestic partnerships were equivalent, and the California Supreme
>> >> Court's opinion on that is one of the best ones to go with given
>> >> the effort the court went to in making its decision.  This is a
>> >> matter of fact, not a matter of what the voters decide to do.
>>
>> >> Are you too daft to understand the distinction?
>>
>> > As I said before, I don't give a rats ass about the distinction
>> > between marriage and domestic partnerships. The only thing
>> > I care about is the judiciary respecting the will of the voters.
>>
>> I don't care what you give a "rats [sic] ass" about, but if you had
>> no interest, why did you jump into a discussion about whether
>> domestic partnerships were equivalent to marriage, which was the
>> *only* point under discussion?
>>
>> If you have something unrelated to say, it is far better to start a
>> new thread.

> Because that's not all what this thread is about. This thread is
> about all the pros and cons of Prop. 8, not just the ones you are
> personally interested in. In 24 hours we shall see who the fool is
> ;-)

No, it was all the thread you replied to was about, and BTW the fool
is *you* regardless of how the vote turns out - the vote cannot change
the facts and you tried to pretend otherwise.  What a vote can do is
to make a decision that ignores the facts, which can lead to a bad
decision (depending on what specifically is ignored).

BTW, threads are not simply all posts with the same subject line, and
what you jumped into was a discussion about a specific topic: whether
marriage was equivalent to domestic partnerships.  It isn't.  If you
wanted to talk about something else, you should have replied to
someone talking about what you now claim you are interested in.