🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sac.general
Article #223

Re: Vote NO on Prop Eight

#223
From: Bill Z.
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 20:56
18 lines
2591 bytes
"A Browne" <Rpalino@mailandnews..com> writes:

>> Anyway, if the majority of the people decide anything, and get the
>> constitution amended, then, whatever it is, is.
>
> First, it's take more than "the majority" to change the constitution..

Via an initiative, it only takes a majority to change the California
State Constitution.  Some people think making it that easy to change
was a mistake.  Proposition 8 takes the wording of the unconstitutional
Proposition 22 and puts it into the state constitution instead of the
family code.  I'm not sure how a judge declares part of the state
constitution to be unconstitutional, unless there is an argument based
on the federal constitution.

As I recall, it takes more signatures to get a constitutional amendment
on the ballot than an ordinary initiative, but that is merely a matter
of cost - the proverbial bar is rather low in either case.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <87bpx0mqk6.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nlpi057.nbdc.sbc.com!prodigy.net!flpi088.ffdc.sbc.com!prodigy.com!flpi107.ffdc.sbc.com!flpi147.ffdc.sbc.com.POSTED!79589bed!not-for-mail
References: <c0c5fef993b772586ad491e239a5debe@dizum.com> <ge88u2$75q$1@snarked.org> <871vy0mekt.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <geahc1$e50$2@snarked.org> <87iqrbt7xu.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <9f0fc340-a744-43d3-83c2-3392ace12879@u29g2000pro.googlegroups.com> <cp8Ok.6914$YU2.347@nlpi066.nbdc.sbc.com> <40a4$49092130$9440b19b$18204@STARBAND.NET> <LWuOk.3409$pr6.3243@flpi149.ffdc.sbc.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10a89e,af9442ae69b6f64f
X-Google-Thread: f824f,af9442ae69b6f64f
X-Google-Attributes: gid10a89e,gidf824f,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nlpi057.nbdc.sbc.com!prodigy.net!flpi088.ffdc.sbc.com!prodigy.com!flpi107.ffdc.sbc.com!flpi147.ffdc.sbc.com.POSTED!79589bed!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sac.general,ba.general,ba.politics,la.general,scruz.general
Subject: Re: Vote NO on Prop Eight
References: <c0c5fef993b772586ad491e239a5debe@dizum.com> <ge88u2$75q$1@snarked.org> <871vy0mekt.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <geahc1$e50$2@snarked.org> <87iqrbt7xu.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <9f0fc340-a744-43d3-83c2-3392ace12879@u29g2000pro.googlegroups.com> <cp8Ok.6914$YU2.347@nlpi066.nbdc.sbc.com> <40a4$49092130$9440b19b$18204@STARBAND.NET> <LWuOk.3409$pr6.3243@flpi149.ffdc.sbc.com>
From: nobody@nospam.pacbell.net (Bill Z.)
Message-ID: <87bpx0mqk6.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:7WpteYXeiOlE3Hf777wkaI6IdaQ=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Lines: 18
NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.233.20.69
X-Complaints-To: abuse@prodigy.net
X-Trace: flpi147.ffdc.sbc.com 1225486066 ST000 209.233.20.69 (Fri, 31 Oct 2008 16:47:46 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 16:47:46 EDT
Organization: at&t http://my.att.net/
X-UserInfo1: Q[RGGSCE@JUYBQH]^JKBOW@@YJ_ZTB\MV@BJ]Q]KEYUNDQUCCNSUAACY@L[ZX__HGFD]JBJNSFXTOOGA_VWY^_HG@FW_HUTHOH]TBPGCO\P^PLP^@[GLHUK@WLECKFVL^TYG[@RMWQXIWM[SDDYWNLG_G[_BWUCHFY_Y@AS@Q[B\APPF@DCZM_PG_VSCPQZM
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:56:41 -0700