Article View: sac.general
Article #228Re: Vote NO on Prop Eight
From: Bill Z.
Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2008 01:42
Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2008 01:42
18 lines
2793 bytes
2793 bytes
kujebak <kujebak@eudoramail.com> writes: > I hope you realize that Proposition 8 is as much a public > backlash against the activist judiciary, as it is about same- > sex marriage. I personally don't care whether gay couples > get to keep their marriage certificates or not, but I'm vo- > ting for the proposition just to straighten out the courts ;-) Do you realize that what you think is an "activist judiciary" on the California Supreme Court contains only one justice who was appointed by a Democrat that all the others were appointed by conservative Republican governors? Do you also realize that Proposition 8 was submitted to the state Sept--Oct 2007, the point where they started to gather signatures? Proposition Eight is not on the ballot because of the decision to allow same-sex marriages - that decision had yet to be made when Proposition Eight was written.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<87vdv63nts.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!news2!nlpi057.nbdc.sbc.com!prodigy.net!flpi088.ffdc.sbc.com!prodigy.com!flpi107.ffdc.sbc.com!nlpi065.nbdc.sbc.com.POSTED!79589bed!not-for-mailReferences:
<c0c5fef993b772586ad491e239a5debe@dizum.com> <ge88u2$75q$1@snarked.org> <871vy0mekt.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <geahc1$e50$2@snarked.org> <87iqrbt7xu.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <9f0fc340-a744-43d3-83c2-3392ace12879@u29g2000pro.googlegroups.com> <cp8Ok.6914$YU2.347@nlpi066.nbdc.sbc.com> <696b82d9-1008-485c-9565-3323ea2b5f92@r37g2000prr.googlegroups.com> <LWuOk.3408$pr6.729@flpi149.ffdc.sbc.com> <53139b7d-6864-432c-8792-34f87c80ea90@d10g2000pra.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10a89e,af9442ae69b6f64f X-Google-Thread: f824f,af9442ae69b6f64f X-Google-Thread: 102fd5,af9442ae69b6f64f X-Google-Thread: 107d03,af9442ae69b6f64f X-Google-Thread: 10d50a,af9442ae69b6f64f X-Google-Attributes: gid10a89e,gidf824f,gid102fd5,gid107d03,gid10d50a,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!news2!nlpi057.nbdc.sbc.com!prodigy.net!flpi088.ffdc.sbc.com!prodigy.com!flpi107.ffdc.sbc.com!nlpi065.nbdc.sbc.com.POSTED!79589bed!not-for-mail Newsgroups: sac.general,ba.general,ba.politics,la.general,scruz.general Subject: Re: Vote NO on Prop Eight References: <c0c5fef993b772586ad491e239a5debe@dizum.com> <ge88u2$75q$1@snarked.org> <871vy0mekt.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <geahc1$e50$2@snarked.org> <87iqrbt7xu.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <9f0fc340-a744-43d3-83c2-3392ace12879@u29g2000pro.googlegroups.com> <cp8Ok.6914$YU2.347@nlpi066.nbdc.sbc.com> <696b82d9-1008-485c-9565-3323ea2b5f92@r37g2000prr.googlegroups.com> <LWuOk.3408$pr6.729@flpi149.ffdc.sbc.com> <53139b7d-6864-432c-8792-34f87c80ea90@d10g2000pra.googlegroups.com> From: nobody@nospam.pacbell.net (Bill Z.) Message-ID: <87vdv63nts.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:ODfsVYyRpDhMDOblBDKLIx2LLyg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Lines: 22 NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.233.20.69 X-Complaints-To: abuse@prodigy.net X-Trace: nlpi065.nbdc.sbc.com 1225589840 ST000 209.233.20.69 (Sat, 01 Nov 2008 21:37:20 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2008 21:37:20 EDT Organization: at&t http://my.att.net/ X-UserInfo1: TSU[@I_AOPPQR\\XKRHDM^P@VZ\LPCXLLBWLOOAFEQR@ETUCCNSKQFCY@TXDX_WHSVB]ZEJLSNY\^J[CUVSA_QLFC^RQHUPH[P[NRWCCMLSNPOD_ESALHUK@TDFUZHBLJ\XGKL^NXA\EVHSP[D_C^B_^JCX^W]CHBAX]POG@SSAZQ\LE[DCNMUPG_VSC@VJM Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2008 18:42:55 -0700