Re: Vote NO on Prop Eight

Article View: sac.general

Article #241

#241

From: Bill Z.
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2008 18:07

29 lines
3198 bytes

kujebak <kujebak@eudoramail.com> writes:

> On Nov 2, 7:12 pm, nob...@nospam.pacbell.net (Bill Z.) wrote:
>> kujebak <kuje...@eudoramail.com> writes:
>> > On Nov 2, 12:31 pm, nob...@nospam.pacbell.net (Bill Z.) wrote:
>> >> Bogus argument - we weren't talking about who had "the ultimate power
>> >> to decide" but rather whether civil unions are equivalent to marriage
>> >> as a matter of fact.

>> Irrelevant - we were discussing whether or not marriage and
>> domestic partnerships were equivalent, and the California Supreme
>> Court's opinion on that is one of the best ones to go with given
>> the effort the court went to in making its decision.  This is a
>> matter of fact, not a matter of what the voters decide to do.
>>
>> Are you too daft to understand the distinction?
>
> As I said before, I don't give a rats ass about the distinction
> between marriage and domestic partnerships. The only thing
> I care about is the judiciary respecting the will of the voters.
>

I don't care what you give a "rats [sic] ass" about, but if you had no
interest, why did you jump into a discussion about whether domestic
partnerships were equivalent to marriage, which was the *only* point
under discussion?

If you have something unrelated to say, it is far better to start
a new thread.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <87iqr4n0no.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!headwall.stanford.edu!newshub.sdsu.edu!flpi089.ffdc.sbc.com!prodigy.net!flpi088.ffdc.sbc.com!prodigy.com!flpi107.ffdc.sbc.com!nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com.POSTED!79589bed!not-for-mail

References:

<c0c5fef993b772586ad491e239a5debe@dizum.com> <ge88u2$75q$1@snarked.org> <871vy0mekt.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <geahc1$e50$2@snarked.org> <87iqrbt7xu.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <Xns9B4A69D056755ibmsvpalorgl@216.196.97.131> <87wsflna46.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <e78b0c14-03bc-48b7-b0a1-ec88f3717d78@t39g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <87y701pkok.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <a81a5053-2c17-4f56-a868-471588f1c73a@s9g2000prg.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: f824f,af9442ae69b6f64f
X-Google-Thread: 102fd5,af9442ae69b6f64f
X-Google-Thread: 107d03,af9442ae69b6f64f
X-Google-Thread: 10d50a,af9442ae69b6f64f
X-Google-Attributes: gidf824f,gid102fd5,gid107d03,gid10d50a,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!headwall.stanford.edu!newshub.sdsu.edu!flpi089.ffdc.sbc.com!prodigy.net!flpi088.ffdc.sbc.com!prodigy.com!flpi107.ffdc.sbc.com!nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com.POSTED!79589bed!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sac.general,ba.general,ba.politics,la.general,scruz.general
Subject: Re: Vote NO on Prop Eight
References: <c0c5fef993b772586ad491e239a5debe@dizum.com> <ge88u2$75q$1@snarked.org> <871vy0mekt.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <geahc1$e50$2@snarked.org> <87iqrbt7xu.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <Xns9B4A69D056755ibmsvpalorgl@216.196.97.131> <87wsflna46.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <e78b0c14-03bc-48b7-b0a1-ec88f3717d78@t39g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <87y701pkok.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <a81a5053-2c17-4f56-a868-471588f1c73a@s9g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
From: nobody@nospam.pacbell.net (Bill Z.)
Message-ID: <87iqr4n0no.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:/dMOZhoRwAu57YgdSVLgoby3UAM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 29
NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.233.20.69
X-Complaints-To: abuse@prodigy.net
X-Trace: nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com 1225735319 ST000 209.233.20.69 (Mon, 03 Nov 2008 13:01:59 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2008 13:01:59 EST
Organization: at&t http://my.att.net/
X-UserInfo1: [[PAPDCAOPPQR\\XKRHDM^P@VZ\LPCXLLBWLOOAFQATJUZ]CDVW[AKK[J\]^HVKHG^EWZHBLO^[\NH_AZFWGN^\DHNVMX_DHHX[FSQKBOTS@@BP^]C@RHS_AGDDC[AJM_T[GZNRNZAY]GNCPBDYKOLK^_CZFWPGHZIXW@C[AFKBBQS@E@DAZ]VDFUNTQQ]FN
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2008 10:07:39 -0800

Reply to Parent Message