Article View: sac.general
Article #268Re: Vote NO on Prop Eight
From: Bill Z.
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 07:43
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 07:43
54 lines
4752 bytes
4752 bytes
kujebak <kujebak@eudoramail.com> writes:
> On Dec 4, 5:41 pm, nob...@nospam.pacbell.net (Bill Z.) wrote:
>> kujebak <kuje...@eudoramail.com> writes:
>> > On Dec 4, 3:46 pm, nob...@nospam.pacbell.net (Bill Z.) wrote:
>>
>> >> If you can't read well enough to understand that, there is really no
>> >> point in talking to you.
>>
>> > This was your last attempt to substantiate your claim.
>> > You failed ;-)
>>
>> Nope - you are just lying again - trying to "declare victory"
>> after having made a fool of yourself. You've continually ignored
>> the facts.
>
> I'm not the button-pushing faggot with a social agenda.
> I don't need to declare victory here. All I have to do is
> to end this inane argument ;-)
Actually, you've just shown that you are a mindless, worthless bigot,
obviously the one with an agenda. Do you call everyone such names for
merely stating the truth? Are you so stupid as to actually think that
statements about transmission rates reflects some sort of "social
agenda"? Let's recapitulate.
1. You made an erroneous claim that HIV transmission was
due "entirely" to one specific sex act.
2. I pointed out that was incorrect and suggested that
you might want to revise the statement (in case some
17 year old kid reads your posts and thinks there is no
risk when that simply isn't the case).
3. You then argued about what should be common knowledge rather
than simply admit that your wording was poor.
4. Then you denied that the risk of infection per sex act (with
someone who is infected) depends on what sex acts you perform,
not what your sexual orientation is, and that it is non-zero for
sexual practices common among heterosexual couples.
5. When shown the data (with some URLs that included citations
to medical publications), you simply denied it and start ranting
about some "gay agenda".
6. Then you started ranting some more and finally reverted to
the sort of behavior what we only excuse among adolescents who
are struggling with hormone problems (as your use of a slur
shows above).
Let's say what the truth is: you are a worthless, mindless bigot
incapable of a rational discussion on a topic that was supposed to be
about risk factors - no more, no less.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<87r64n12zs.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!headwall.stanford.edu!newshub.sdsu.edu!flph200.ffdc.sbc.com!prodigy.net!flph199.ffdc.sbc.com!prodigy.com!flpi107.ffdc.sbc.com!nlpi066.nbdc.sbc.com.POSTED!79589bed!not-for-mailReferences:
<c0c5fef993b772586ad491e239a5debe@dizum.com> <87skp51ac1.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <481100f9-7372-4251-895b-89624c03c29e@s1g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <87tz9lngbp.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <03babf30-8e41-451b-86c0-7a684111527b@g17g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <3v9ej41q4ta6408041cttb7se294dvkt55@4ax.com> <bca0568d-f8a0-44bf-bb79-5890bc10a09e@t39g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <873ah4616l.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <91f832e8-dd9f-45d5-b914-9a5caab06d3e@z27g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <8763lz3fny.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <7b2a2567-72dc-478f-82f7-b301e03c2d61@o4g2000pra.googlegroups.com> <87hc5jmwvm.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <56e404f5-9145-45c5-9be2-5102a00bb1bb@x16g2000prn.googlegroups.com> <87fxl3sdvg.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <3897fccf-35f1-4b9e-8008-ccc5e2dad5da@t26g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <87fxl35rgl.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <1e4b3054-0881-46a9-a65f-7450ea3c5e86@s1g2000prg.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10a89e,af9442ae69b6f64f X-Google-Thread: f824f,af9442ae69b6f64f X-Google-Thread: 102fd5,af9442ae69b6f64f X-Google-Thread: 107d03,af9442ae69b6f64f X-Google-Thread: 10d50a,af9442ae69b6f64f X-Google-Attributes: gid10a89e,gidf824f,gid102fd5,gid107d03,gid10d50a,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8 Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!headwall.stanford.edu!newshub.sdsu.edu!flph200.ffdc.sbc.com!prodigy.net!flph199.ffdc.sbc.com!prodigy.com!flpi107.ffdc.sbc.com!nlpi066.nbdc.sbc.com.POSTED!79589bed!not-for-mail Newsgroups: sac.general,ba.general,ba.politics,la.general,scruz.general Subject: Re: Vote NO on Prop Eight References: <c0c5fef993b772586ad491e239a5debe@dizum.com> <87skp51ac1.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <481100f9-7372-4251-895b-89624c03c29e@s1g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <87tz9lngbp.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <03babf30-8e41-451b-86c0-7a684111527b@g17g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <3v9ej41q4ta6408041cttb7se294dvkt55@4ax.com> <bca0568d-f8a0-44bf-bb79-5890bc10a09e@t39g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <873ah4616l.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <91f832e8-dd9f-45d5-b914-9a5caab06d3e@z27g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <8763lz3fny.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <7b2a2567-72dc-478f-82f7-b301e03c2d61@o4g2000pra.googlegroups.com> <87hc5jmwvm.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <56e404f5-9145-45c5-9be2-5102a00bb1bb@x16g2000prn.googlegroups.com> <87fxl3sdvg.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <3897fccf-35f1-4b9e-8008-ccc5e2dad5da@t26g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <87fxl35rgl.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <1e4b3054-0881-46a9-a65f-7450ea3c5e86@s1g2000prg.googlegroups.com> From: nobody@nospam.pacbell.net (Bill Z.) Message-ID: <87r64n12zs.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:nr3Cp87Zn07YiBIfrBEVYKAjigg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 54 NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.233.20.69 X-Complaints-To: abuse@prodigy.net X-Trace: nlpi066.nbdc.sbc.com 1228462579 ST000 209.233.20.69 (Fri, 05 Dec 2008 02:36:19 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 02:36:19 EST Organization: at&t http://my.att.net/ X-UserInfo1: [[OGS^SGXJWOBFH[OZK@_TDAYZOZ@GXOXZ\@LWQHBATBTSUBYFWEAE[YJLYPIWKHTFCMZKVMB^[Z^DOBRVVMOSPFHNSYXVDIE@X\BUC@GTSX@DL^GKFFHQCCE\G[JJBMYDYIJCZM@AY]GNGPJD]YNNW\GSX^GSCKHA[]@CCB\[@LATPD\L@J\\PF]VR[QPJN Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 23:43:19 -0800