🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <7tl2jt$q95$1@news.psyber.com>,
Barry <barry@jasmine.psyber.com> wrote:
>: unconstitutional about the fee? It seems to me that the idea
>: behind the fee is to discourage Californians from buying cars in
>: states with less stringent pollution requirements and
>: transporting them to California.
>
>If one brought in a car from out of state that produced the same
>emissions as a "California car", they would also be penalized.  I
>saw something wrong with this issue.  Additionally, simply
>"taxing" a person for a noncompliant car had zero effect on the
>emissions.  It was just a method to extort money from people IMHO.

If the car is made such as to meet California emission
requiremments it should have a decal saying so under the hood. Then
there's no charge.

-- 
    ********** DAVE HATUNEN (hatunen@sonic.net) ***********
    *                Daly City California                 *
    ******* My typos are intentional copyright traps ******