Article View: sbay.general
Article #450Re: St. James Infirmiry -- end of an era?
From: Geoff Miller
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 1996 00:00
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 1996 00:00
62 lines
2822 bytes
2822 bytes
Earlier I wrote (reasonably enough, I thought): >: Part of the implied contract between restaurant and customer >: is that while he's on the premises, the customer will obtain >: all food and drink from the proprietor exclusively. James Salsman <jps@mti.sgi.com> replies: > I think that is insensitive to people with > pervasive food allergies (e.g., wheat) who > want to enjoy the company of their friends > in the atmosphere of a resturant. <snort> People's allergies aren't the restaurant's problem. They're free to chose another place to enjoy the company of their friends (including somebody's home) if a restaurant's policies aren't to their liking, just like anybody else is. Restaurants have no obligation to accomodate them. And if somebody is allergic to wheat or whatever, then he certainly doesn't have to order any dish containing that substance. Problem solved. Of course, that approach sends the issue zooming back over the rhetorical tennis net at the complainer and firmly establishes it as a matter of personal responsibility, which won't sit well with the more left-leaning folks in the audience, but there it is... Restaurants are businesses, free to establish their own ground rules as they see fit. And customers are free to choose which business to patronize. People can be found who are allergic to damn near anything -- especially _these_ days, when it's apparently hip to be weak^H^H^H^Hsensitive (in _all_ senses of the word). I thought I'd left the world of finicky eaters behind by the time I'd turned eleven or twelve, but these days it seems that everybody's "allergic" to this or has a "sensitivity" to that or "can't eat" the other. Whine, whine, whine. What's all this talk of "sensitivity" I see these days? "Insensitive" has become the latest liberal buzzword, much like "empowerment" was in the 1980s. And it's evidence that women have found their political voice, too; "sensitivity" isn't something that it would occur to most men to speak in terms of. At least, not unless they were trying to get laid... Geoff -- Why be politically correct when you can be right?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<geoffmDtvIAD.JGx@netcom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<DtJnFw.6yz@oriole.sbay.org> <geoffmDtouF8.Hpw@netcom.com> <31D48431.59E2@mti.sgi.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fe8e7,7f160760baac724c X-Google-Attributes: gidfe8e7,public X-Google-Thread: 11582c,4130c4fe39b55048 X-Google-Attributes: gid11582c,public From: geoffm@netcom.com (Geoff Miller) Subject: Re: St. James Infirmiry -- end of an era? Date: 1996/07/01 Message-ID: <geoffmDtvIAD.JGx@netcom.com> X-Deja-AN: 163131132 sender: geoffm@netcom4.netcom.com references: <DtJnFw.6yz@oriole.sbay.org> <geoffmDtouF8.Hpw@netcom.com> <31D48431.59E2@mti.sgi.com> organization: The Arsenal Of Democracy followup-to: sbay.general,ba.food newsgroups: sbay.general,ba.food