🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <geoffmDtvyIt.IwI@netcom.com>,
Geoff Miller <geoffm@netcom.com> wrote:
>
>>: People's allergies aren't the restaurant's problem.  
>>: They're free to chose another place to enjoy the
>>: company of their friends (including somebody's home)
>>: if a restaurant's policies aren't to their liking, just
>>: like anybody else is.  Restaurants have no obligation
>>: to accomodate them.  And if somebody is allergic to wheat
>>: or whatever, then he certainly doesn't have to order any
>>: dish containing that substance.  Problem solved.  

And this I agreed with, although I can see a case to
be made for requiring a restaurant to disclose ingredient
lists to customers who request them to allow the customer
to make a rational decision as to whether or not he
wishes to patronize that establishment.

But then you went on to make a gratuitous slap at those
who really do have food allergies, implying that they
are (a) PC, (b) weak, (c) liberal, (d) faking, and (e)
trying to get laid.

Now I personally do fit into some of those categories,
but they really seem to have nothing to do with how I
react to certain foods. And I see no reason to make the
implications you were making as they in no way work to
advance your point. Guess you were just trying to get
laid.


-- 
Dave Eisen                               Sequoia Peripherals: (415) 967-5644
dkeisen@netcom.com                       FAX:                 (415) 967-5648
       There's something in my library to offend everybody. 
          --- Washington Coalition Against Censorship