Article View: sci.aeronautics
Article #710Re: Aerodynamic centers of various airfoils
From: Al Bowers
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 19:34
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 19:34
45 lines
2892 bytes
2892 bytes
In article <1993Jan20.232439.14173@bmerh85.bnr.ca> mkfeil@bcrki9.bnr.ca (Max Feil) writes: >As I understand it, the aerodynamic center of all airfoils is very >close to the 25% chord point when operated subsonically. My question >is: Just how far does it vary for the different kinds of airfoil >sections, eg. conventional; flat (sometimes used for fins/stabs); >reflexed; laminar flow (high point at 50%); etc. I believe that this is a result of lifting lione theory, that the AC will always be at 25% chord. >As an example, in data I have the a.c. of NACA 2412 ranges between >23.9% and 24.7% at reynold's numbers between 3.1E6 and 8.9E6 (this is >a semi-symmetrical airfoil). All the other airfoil's that I have data >for are also within a percent or two of 25%, but none of these are >exotic. Even the more exotic airfoils (eg. supercriticals, GAWs, Eppler, Wortman, Liebeck, Drela types, etc) behave in this way. I think as long as you maintain reasonably attached flow on the airfoil, it should hold. If you do something stupid, like a cusp on the trailing edge that is so strong that it never attaches the flow, then I'd expect it to not be well behaved. >Another question: In supersonic flow the a.c. is at 50% chord, as a >result of (as I understand it) fairly equivalent shock wave effects at >the leading and trailing edge. How far does this vary among airfoils? >What does the transition (trans-sonic) area look like when comparing >the a.c.'s of different airfoils? I think this is explained by Busemann's theory. And in most of the cases I have seen, it behaves very close to the theory as well. This was the idea behind unstable aircraft. If you make the CG farther back so that the aircraft has a negative static margin subsonically, then supersonically, the static margin will be less positive than if you has a subsonically stable aircraft. This should reduce your transonic trim drag and give better supersonic performance. Unfortunately, you also incur problems with high alpha recovery and trim drag at subsonic conditions. -- Al Bowers bowers@rigel.dfrf.nasa.gov NASA F-18 High Alpha Research Vehicle, Lead Aero NASA, Dryden Flight Research Facility, Edwards, California
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<BOWERS.93Jan21113416@rigel.dfrf.nasa.gov>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!ames!news.dfrf.nasa.gov!rigel.dfrf.nasa.gov!bowersReferences:
<1993Jan20.200017.11567@news.arc.nasa.gov> <1993Jan20.232439.14173@bmerh85.bnr.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.aeronautics Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!ames!news.dfrf.nasa.gov!rigel.dfrf.nasa.gov!bowers From: bowers@rigel.dfrf.nasa.gov (Al Bowers) Subject: Re: Aerodynamic centers of various airfoils In-Reply-To: mkfeil@bcrki9.bnr.ca's message of Wed, 20 Jan 93 23:24:39 GMT Message-ID: <BOWERS.93Jan21113416@rigel.dfrf.nasa.gov> Sender: news@news.dfrf.nasa.gov (Usenet news) Organization: NASA Dryden, Edwards, Cal. References: <1993Jan20.200017.11567@news.arc.nasa.gov> <1993Jan20.232439.14173@bmerh85.bnr.ca> Distribution: sci.aeronautics Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 19:34:20 GMT Lines: 45