Thread View: sci.aeronautics
5 messages
5 total messages
Started by Perry Morrison (Dr)
Thu, 21 Jan 1993 07:44
Controlling Airship Lift
Author: Perry Morrison (Dr)
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 07:44
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 07:44
11 lines
780 bytes
780 bytes
Some time back I posted a query about dirigible/blimp control surfaces. Now I have another query- could a helium filled airship control its lift by having some internal heat delivering device such as an electric radiator. I'm aware hot air balloons generate lift by heating the enevelope with LPG flame. Could sufficient expansion be delivered by an electric/non combustion method? cheers Perry Morrison
Re: Controlling Airship Lift
Author: Michael F. Kamprath
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 21:18
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 21:18
26 lines
1818 bytes
1818 bytes
In article <1993Jan21.074446.15421@nuscc.nus.sg> Perry Morrison, swkmorri@nuscc.nus.sg writes: >Some time back I posted a query about dirigible/blimp control surfaces. >Now I have another query- could a helium filled airship control its >lift by having some internal heat delivering device such as an electric >radiator. > >I'm aware hot air balloons generate lift by heating the enevelope with >LPG flame. Could sufficient expansion be delivered by an electric/non >combustion method? > >cheers >Perry Morrison > Lift is not a good choice of words to describe why hot air/helium balloons and dirigibles "fly" -- try buoyancy. Anyways, yes they can, but an electric heater would weigh temendous amount. It would probably weigh less just to bring more helium along for the ride. ====================================================================== |Michael F. Kamprath | The University of Michigan | | kamprath@space-grant.sprl.umich.edu | Aerospace Engineering | | kamprath@engin.umich.edu | Graduate Student | ======================================================================
Re: Controlling Airship Lift
Author: Ken Kobayashi
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 23:55
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 23:55
35 lines
2150 bytes
2150 bytes
kamprath@space-grant.sprl.umich.edu (Michael F. Kamprath) writes: >In article <1993Jan21.074446.15421@nuscc.nus.sg> Perry Morrison, >swkmorri@nuscc.nus.sg writes: >>Some time back I posted a query about dirigible/blimp control surfaces. >>Now I have another query- could a helium filled airship control its >>lift by having some internal heat delivering device such as an electric >>radiator. >> >>I'm aware hot air balloons generate lift by heating the enevelope with >>LPG flame. Could sufficient expansion be delivered by an electric/non >>combustion method? >> >>cheers >>Perry Morrison >> >Lift is not a good choice of words to describe why hot air/helium balloons and >dirigibles "fly" -- try buoyancy. >Anyways, yes they can, but an electric heater would weigh temendous amount. >It would probably weigh less just to bring more helium along for the ride. And thtow away expensive helium when you want to go down? I think the point of the original poster is that if heaters are used the dirigible can go up or down without loss of helium. But if electric heaters are too heavy, how about gas burners, like the ones used on hot-air balloons? Those should be light enough, and it shouldn't be too hard to construct a safe heat-exchange system... I also heard of a design that uses a hydrogen-filled gas-bag nested inside a helium gas chamber. Buoyancy is controlled by inflating (from a tank?) or deflating (releasing into atmosphere) the hydrogen. No helium is lost, and since the hydrogen is surrounded by helium it's not as dangerous as the Zeppelin. I don't think it's ever been actually used though.
Re: Controlling Airship Lift
Author: Andrew Whelan
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 15:52
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 15:52
70 lines
3734 bytes
3734 bytes
In article <kkobayas.727919759@husc.harvard.edu> kkobayas@husc8.harvard.edu (Ken Kobayashi) writes:
>kamprath@space-grant.sprl.umich.edu (Michael F. Kamprath) writes:
>
>>In article <1993Jan21.074446.15421@nuscc.nus.sg> Perry Morrison,
>>swkmorri@nuscc.nus.sg writes:
>>>Some time back I posted a query about dirigible/blimp control surfaces.
>>>Now I have another query- could a helium filled airship control its
>>>lift by having some internal heat delivering device such as an electric
>>>radiator.
>>>
>>>I'm aware hot air balloons generate lift by heating the enevelope with
>>>LPG flame. Could sufficient expansion be delivered by an electric/non
>>>combustion method?
>>>
>>>cheers
>>>Perry Morrison
>>>
>
>>Lift is not a good choice of words to describe why hot air/helium balloons and
>>dirigibles "fly" -- try buoyancy.
>
>>Anyways, yes they can, but an electric heater would weigh temendous amount.
>>It would probably weigh less just to bring more helium along for the ride.
>
>
> And thtow away expensive helium when you want to go down? I think the
>point of the original poster is that if heaters are used the dirigible can
>go up or down without loss of helium. But if electric heaters are too
>heavy, how about gas burners, like the ones used on hot-air balloons?
>Those should be light enough, and it shouldn't be too hard to construct a
>safe heat-exchange system...
Hang on a sec! As Kamprath wrote, the important part here is the bouyancy.
Blimps, like the Goodyear bunch, keep a constant (or nearly so) amount of
helium in the envelope and regulate the volume of the heluim to regulate
the lift. By pumping more air into pockets in the envelope, the pockets
expand, compress the heluim, and lower the bouyancy.
______________________________
/ | | \ ______
/ | | \/ \
/ Air | | Air \ |
/ | | \_____/
\_________/ Helium \__________ / \
\ / |
\ /\______/
\______________________________/
| |
|______|
If you have seen the Goodyear blimps on the ground, there are two
chain-saw sized motors that hang near the gondola and appear to
start randomly. These motors regulate the helium/air ratios.
Back (way back) to Morrison's original question: could heaters be used
to expand the heluim? Yes, but since a source of energy would be needed
to maintain altitude, it would be less practical than regulating the
helium/air ratios.
--
________________________________________________________________________
andrew whelan
aewhelan@icaen.uiowa.edu
university of iowa, idaho city, ohio
________________________________________________________________________
Re: Controlling Airship Lift
Author: Mark Drela
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 03:09
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 03:09
22 lines
1817 bytes
1817 bytes
In article <kkobayas.727919759@husc.harvard.edu>, kkobayas@husc8.harvard.edu (Ken Kobayashi) writes: |> kamprath@space-grant.sprl.umich.edu (Michael F. Kamprath) writes: |> |> >Anyways, yes they can, but an electric heater would weigh temendous amount. |> >It would probably weigh less just to bring more helium along for the ride. |> |> |> And thtow away expensive helium when you want to go down? I think the |> point of the original poster is that if heaters are used the dirigible can |> go up or down without loss of helium. But if electric heaters are too |> heavy, how about gas burners, like the ones used on hot-air balloons? |> Those should be light enough, and it shouldn't be too hard to construct a |> safe heat-exchange system... Heating the helium in a balloon doesn't buy you very much. If the absolute temperature of the helium were doubled (from 0F to a rather toasty 490F, say), the He density would be decreased by a factor of two, but the balloon's lift would increase only 7%. Any of the common plastic balloon envelopes like Nylon would probably combust before then. Mark Drela First Law of Aviation: MIT Aero & Astro "Takeoff is optional, landing is compulsory"
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads