Thread View: sci.anthropology
2 messages
2 total messages
Started by Ed Conrad
Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:46
EVOLUTIONISTS BLACKBALLED BY ED CONRAD
Author: Ed Conrad
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:46
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:46
189 lines
8775 bytes
8775 bytes
<
<
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/SimplyMagic/Dartboard.jpg
<
Just when I thought my balls, gone black,
And a bit bluish, after Ed's aggravation
But now he's back (He sure ain't dead!)
I'll just have to order some more medication
<
Ed Conrad
> http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/afraid.gif
> http://www.edconrad.com
<
==============================================
>
<
Despite the wild, baseless rhetoric uttered by members of the
Scientific Establishment -- in or out of court -- there is STILL not
one shred of physical evidence confirming that evolution is correct.
Ask for it and you WON'T get it because it simply does not exist.
<
Evolutionists have a pipe dream, maintaining such physical evidence
abounds, and they're doing so not so much to protect an erroneous
paradigm but to protect their vested interests.
>
Let them say a single word that evolution "may not" be correct
and -- Bingo! -- they realize they'd be blackballed from ever again
having a nice soft ass-kissing position within the scientific
community. They'd most likely wind up selling apples on the corner.
<
> http://www.edconrad.com/canals/edisonnewquote.gif
> http://www.edconrad.com/canals/hooton.gif
> http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/krogquote.gif
<
> ===================================
<
> THAT SOB OF AN ED CONRAD
<
> The shoe fits, so I suppose I'll have to wear it:
<
> "An odd individual certainly, often without
> scientific credentials, cantankerous and
> eccentric, yet he possesses certain assets
> that go unnoticed . . . he need not worry
> about losing face with his colleagues for,
> more usually than not, the poor fellow
> has none . . .
<
> "The gifted amateur has no rosy bubble
> to break and is often regarded as a fool
> to begin with: he can afford to dally. His
> livelihood is not dependant upon his success
> or failure and, lacking credentials, he does
> not fear losing what he does not possess."
<
> -- Seth
> ==================================
<
Now let us begin...
<
Maestro, some Conspiratorial Music, please.
<
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/ID/adcrypt.gif
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/SimplyMagic/TightFit.jpg
<
> WHEN SCIENCE MEETS PSEUDOSCIENCE
<
> http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/index.html
> http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/page2.html
> http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/page3.html
> http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/page4.html
> http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/cmon.html
>
> ========================================
>
> THE COVER-UP THAT CAN'T BE COVERED
> (Petrified Coal-Age Bones, Teeth and Soft Organs)
<
< (A golden rule of geology is that coal is a minimum of 280
million years old, dating back to the Carboniferous Period.)
<
> (Many Specimens Found After Web Page Constructed)
<
Photos show a petrified human femur embedded in slate
that was excavated during an open-pit mining operation
in Pennsylvania's anthracite region:
<
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/z8femur.jpg
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/D24x/z7femur.jpg
<
> ========================================
<
PETRIFIED HUMAN FINGER AND TOE
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/FINGER/FINGERSx.jpg
(during Power Point presentation in Switzerland)
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix2/MVC-006S.JPG
<
Two Petrified Human Skulls (one embedded in boulder)
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z11calv.jpg
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/skullb.jpg
<
Handcarved Tool/Weapon Handle (Turned to Anthracite)
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-001S.JPG
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-002S.JPG
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-003S.JPG
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-004S.JPG
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-005S.JPG
>
Other Petrified Specimens
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/newtibia.jpg
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/ID\MVC-005S.JPG
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/z5gall.jpg
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/z9lung.jpg
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/brain/MVC-001S.JPG
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/1tooth.jpg
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/ID/premolar.jpg
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix3/z3dino.jpg
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/ID/MVC-013F.JPG
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Day/MVC-005S.JPG
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/ID\MVC-017S.JPG
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-010S.JPG
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-020S.JPG
<
> SOME FAVORABLE SCIENTIFIC TEST RESULTS
<
Yerkes Regional Primate Research Center
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-008S.JPG
>
American Medical Laboratories
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/ID\MVC-024S.JPG
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/ID\MVC-002S.JPG
<
CATscan on petrified premolar
> http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/graph.gif
<
Scanning Electron Microscopy on petrified tibia
> http://www.edconrad.com/canals/sem.jpg
<
Presence of Haversian canals (Photo of tibia ground section)
> http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/proof1.jpg
<
> =========================================
>
> TIME TO EAT HUMBLE PIE
<
This is the HubbleTelescope's 2004 ultra view photo, one
that was taken of a totally blackened sky as if through an
EIGHT-FOOT STRAW. Result: galaxies upon galaxies upon
galaxies, meaning that our universe is far bigger than we
can even begin to fathom.
>
http://www.spacedaily.com/images/hubble-ultradeep-desk-1024.jpg
> Ed Conrad
> http://www.edconrad.com
<
Man as Old as Coal (and probably a whole lot older)
>
==========================================
>
> (cc) Reuters AP Assocated Press UPI United Press International
> ABC NBC CBS Fox News CNN MSNBC Meet the Press Larry King
> 20/20 60 Minutes Time Newsweek People Life National Enquirer
> Star Jay Leno David Letterman Barbara Walters Chris Matthews Good
> Morning America The Discovery Channel PBS British Broadcasting
> Corp. The History Channel Pravda President George Bush U.S. Senate
> U.S. House of Representatives Gov. Ed Rendell Aaron Brown General
> Accounting Office GAO New England Journal of Medicine Paul Myers
> Andrew Macrae Allan Mann Alan Walker Wall Street Journal U.S. Today
> Reading Eagle Harrisburg Patriot-News Allentown Call Pittsburgh
> Post-Gazette Philadelphia Inquirer Daily News Paleontological Research
> Institute Penn State University University of Pennsylvania McGill
> University Concordia University of California at Berkeley Harvard
> University Johns Hopkins University American Medical Laboratories
> Yerkes Regional Primate Research Center Supreme Court Intelligent
> Design Evolution Charles Darwin Hurricane Wilma American Association
> of Physical Anthropologists Immanuel Velikovsky American Association
> for the Advancement of Science Paleontological Research Institute
> British Museum of Natural History Dover Area School Judge
> John E. Jones III Ediacara University American Journal of Physical
> Anthropology Yearbook of Physical Anthropology Society for Applied
> Anthropology Harvard University Museum of Anthropology Raymond
> T. Rye II Smithsonian Institution National Museum of Natural History
> Good Morning America Today Anderson Cooper New York Times
> Daily News Post Washington Post Times Newsday Newsweek Wall
> Street Journal U.S. Today Avian flu Bird flu David Iain Greig talk.origins
<
< ========================================
<
Re: EVOLUTIONISTS BLACKBALLED BY ED CONRAD
Author: Rick Thorne
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 23:23
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 23:23
83 lines
4964 bytes
4964 bytes
Ed Conrad wrote: > Despite the wild, baseless rhetoric uttered by members of the > Scientific Establishment -- in or out of court -- there is STILL not > one shred of physical evidence confirming that evolution is correct. > Ask for it and you WON'T get it because it simply does not exist. Yes, yes, of course. Scientists are trying to protect their own because there are just sooo many advantages to being an evolutionary scientist! Look at the perks! 1) Top pay - Don't you know? Most of your Fortune 500 people are evolutionary scientists! Warren Buffet - scientist! Orpah Winfrey - scientist! Sam Walton and his heirs - all scientists! That's what Wal-mart is dontchaknow - a place where evolutionary scientists make $1B per day!!! Evolutionary science is how most self-made billionaires make their money - and they want to keep you honest and well-informed creationists out of the cookie jar! 2) Celebrity status - Look at the cover of People Magazine! Who's on the cover: Ben Affleck, Jennifer Aniston, Angelina Jolie, and JLo - all well known evolutionary scientists! Everyone knows that evolutionary scientists get all the chicks! Even the chick evolutionary scientists score with the chicks! You guys who aren't scoring with the chicks - study evolutionary science! It's a veritable sea of babe-itude! 3) Influence in politics - we all know about the influence that evolutionary scientists wield in Washington, and especially among those Republican neocons! Ralph Reed, Pat Robertson, and Jim Dodson don't have nearly the same clout with the Bush Administration that we evolutionists have - why, they're outsiders compared to us! What's that Mr. President - oh I'm sorry, G-man, I'd love to come to dinner in the West Wing with you and the misses, but I'm having a dinner with a cabal of evolutionary scientists! We're busy trying to stonewall Ed Conrad, because by gar he's just the most pressing problem in our shallow, greedy, selfish lives! Sooo, yes, Ed's got us figured out! We evolutionary scientists are liars and elitists because we're jealously guarding our vast fortunes and our enviable fame and damn it, we score with the babes and we want to keep all that to ourselves like the lying hoarding bastards we are! > > TIME TO EAT HUMBLE PIE > < > This is the HubbleTelescope's 2004 ultra view photo, one > that was taken of a totally blackened sky as if through an > EIGHT-FOOT STRAW. Result: galaxies upon galaxies upon > galaxies, meaning that our universe is far bigger than we > can even begin to fathom. Critical Thinking 101 - Final Exam Question 1, Multiple Choice: Follow the logic of the statements below and deduce the most logical conclusion. Premise A: Ed Conrad states that modern science is completely unreliable Premise B: Ed Conrad claims a picture taken with the technology developed by that same science proves his point. What is the most logical conclusion? a) Ed Conrad is right - modern science really sucks ass, and they really need to take him seriously. b) Ed Conrad is right as proven by modern science, which is completely flawed except in its capacity to prove Ed Conrad right c) Ed Conrad is a doof who is dissed by the scientific community he vilifies for all the right reasons. Question time limit: the rest of your life, but please... > > http://www.edconrad.com Q: Are scientists afraid of Ed Conrad? A: Hell no. We just don't have *time* for you. Rick www.ricksongs.com
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads