Article View: sci.aquaria
Article #191dKH to ppm CaCO3 conversion
From: Fernando Pineda
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 13:15
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 13:15
21 lines
1315 bytes
1315 bytes
I was looking at Martin Moe's Marine Reference book and I'm puzzled by his dKH conversion (cf. p. 36) . Sea water should have ~400 ppm Ca+2 ions or equivalently, ~1000 ppm CaCO3. Now if I take his conversion to dKH I either divide ppm CaCO2 by 17.9 or multiply by 0.05 (I'll forgive his approximation 0.05 ~1/17.9). If I follow his prescription and divide by 17.9 this means I would get a dKH for sea water of (1000 ppm CaCO3)/17.9 ~ 56 dKH. From his comments on p. 36 and from other sources it's clear that sea water should have a dKH of less than 7. So what's going on here? I suspect a typo somewhere. I don't think that his conversion is from Ca+2 instead of CaCO3 because this would result in (400 ppm Ca+2)/17.9 ~ 22 dKH which is still too high. Does anyone know what the correct conversion is? Or am I just being stupid here? Fernando Pineda (fernando@aplcomm.jhuapl.edu)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Bw0FIF.2zF@netnews.jhuapl.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!netnews!newsShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.aquaria Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!netnews!news From: fernando@aplcomm.jhuapl.edu (Fernando Pineda) Subject: dKH to ppm CaCO3 conversion Message-ID: <Bw0FIF.2zF@netnews.jhuapl.edu> Sender: usenet@netnews.jhuapl.edu Reply-To: fernando@aplcomm.jhuapl.edu (Fernando Pineda) Organization: Johns Hopkins University/Applied Physics Labs Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 13:15:50 GMT Lines: 21