Article View: sci.aquaria
Article #193Re: dKH to ppm CaCO3 conversion
From: Fernando Pineda
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 19:34
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 19:34
75 lines
3588 bytes
3588 bytes
In article <1992Oct12.164047.4357@javelin.sim.es.com>,
krogers@javelin.sim.es.com (K. Rogers) writes:
>
> fernando@aplcomm.jhuapl.edu (Fernando Pineda) writes:
>
> >I was looking at Martin Moe's Marine Reference book and I'm puzzled by
> >his dKH conversion (cf. p. 36) . Sea water should have ~400 ppm Ca+2 ions or
> >equivalently, ~1000 ppm CaCO3. Now if I take his conversion to dKH I either
> >divide ppm CaCO2 by 17.9 or multiply by 0.05 (I'll forgive his approximation
> >0.05 ~1/17.9).
>
> [calculations deleted]
> krogers@javelin.sim.es.com replies
>
> You're confused on the various hardnesses. You're trying to equate
> calcium hardness with carbonate hardness. Both are measured as CaCO3
> by the test kits available. The 17.9 conversion is for carbonate
> hardness. To confuse things even more, total hardness is also
> expressed as equivalent amounts of CaCO3.
>
> Generally speaking, when "hardness" is mentioned with respect to
> seawater, they're refering to carbonate hardness. That hardness is
> some 7 german degrees or 3.5 meq/l in "standard" seawater.
>
> Calcium hardness is measured to insure sufficient calcium for inverts
> to use. As you cited, a value of 1000 mg/l CaCO3 = 400 mg/l Ca ion
> which is a good value to keep. I keep my tank between 400-500 mg/l.
> The Halimeda seems to do better when things are closer to 500 but I
> also find more limestone deposits at those levels as well.
>
> It took me a long time to get the hardnesses straight in my mind, and
> I'm still not sure I have a complete understanding of them.
> --
You bet I'm confused and I'm still confused. Let me pose the question another
way:
The La Motte test kit gives me a reading of ~400 ppm CaC03 for freshly mixed
Instant Ocean. This is what I expect from Moe and Spotte and all the other
references. Now I want to convert this to a dKH so that I can compare to
comments made in Thiel's books. I won't prejudice the answer by suggesting a
way to do it. Just show me a calculation that gives me an answer that's
consistent with Thiel and other sources, or give me a reason why it can't be
done. Then I'll go away enlightened and happy.
P.S.
Here is what the FAQ has to say about it:
The hardness of the water refers to the amount of dissolved
"hard" metallic ions such as calcium and magnesium. This is
measured in dH. and GH. ????
dH - degree of hardness. Usually denotes general hardness. It is
equivalent to 10 mg oxide of calcium or magnesium in 1 liter
of water or 1dH = 17.9 ppm.
KH - carbonate (and bicarbonate) hardness.
GH - total (general) hardness. This is not always equal to the sum
of the carbonate and non-carbonate hardness because of the
differences in the way all of these things are measured.
In general, what you need to know about hardness is the following:
0-4 dH -- very soft
4-8 dH -- soft
8-12 dH -- medium hard
12-20 dH -- hard
above 20 -- liquid rock (Lake Malawi and Los Angeles, Ca.)
Fernando Pineda (fernando@aplcomm.jhuapl.edu)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Bw0x0x.829@netnews.jhuapl.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!netnews!newsReferences:
<1992Oct12.164047.4357@javelin.sim.es.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.aquaria Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!netnews!news From: fernando@aplcomm.jhuapl.edu (Fernando Pineda) Subject: Re: dKH to ppm CaCO3 conversion Message-ID: <Bw0x0x.829@netnews.jhuapl.edu> Sender: usenet@netnews.jhuapl.edu Reply-To: fernando@aplcomm.jhuapl.edu (Fernando Pineda) Organization: Johns Hopkins University/Applied Physics Labs References: <1992Oct12.164047.4357@javelin.sim.es.com> Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 19:34:09 GMT Lines: 75