🚀 go-pugleaf

"Yousef" <me@our.com> wrote in message
news:L9NG9.34913$fk5.2794168@news0.telusplanet.net...
> I have read numerous reports that 9,55 year old Kennewick Man, found
> in Washington state recently, - during a boat race - was caucasion.
>
> I have also heard theories, that before the land bridge in
> the Bering Straight, that North America was caucasion.
>
> That makes sense that if there were humans on North America,
> prior to the land bridge, then they would not be of asian
> decent. As the asian immigration took place somewhere between
> 25,000 and 10,000 years ago.
>
> Kennewick man, died from an arrow into the pelvis. Forensic
> reports show a stone arrowhead lodged there.
>
> If the people of North America did not have bows and arrows, it
> would not have taken long, for tribes, to spread out,
> and essentially wipe out the occupants that being the caucasians
> who lived here at the time.
>
> So, about those North American land claims, and that apartheid
> document that Canadians have enshrined in the constitution.
> (The Indian Act)
>
> I find it null and void, and move that all anscestral land claims
> be shelved, until all the facts are in, in the case.
>
> -*-

Human beings have been nomadic in the past, and if you take things back
almost 10 millennia, its difficult to imagine how all the races could have
remained in their respective "corners" for all that time.  Navaho tribes in
Arizona speak a language similar to tribes in  the Yukon. There is evidence
that Asiatic peoples once inhabited the Scandinavian region.  Caucasians
have been traced back to central Asia, and before that, one could assume
they inhabited somewhere else, such as eastern Asia. The first peoples to
cross the land bridge may well have been Caucasians, but how does that
matter?  Modern land claims that assert that a certain people has inhabited
a particular region since time immemorial are not supported by fact, to say
the least.