Article View: sci.archaeology
Article #827Re: sailing from Hawaiki (cont.)
From: benlizross
Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 00:00
Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 00:00
48 lines
2776 bytes
2776 bytes
Yuri Kuchinsky wrote: > > benlizross <benlizro@ihug.co.nz> wrote: > > : The question is not whether you can find > : cultural similarities between the NW coast and parts of Polynesia (eg > : the Maori and the Kwakiutl both built large wooden houses and excelled > : at wood carving), but whether those parallels have to be explained by > : some direct historical connection. > > So what is the alternative to direct historical connection? Gosh, Yuri, maybe you should have checked out the alternatives before you started your "I am not a Diffusionist" campaign... As you are no doubt aware, when you are not pretending not to be, alternatives to direct historical connection would include common inheritance from a remote common source in Asia, functional convergence, and sheer coincidence. > : On the third point, as was explained during the earlier exchange: The NW > : coast bark beaters broke down cedar bark into fibres. These fibres were > : then used for a variety of purposes, including twining to make into > : capes etc. Polynesian tapa beaters flattened and spread the inner bark > : of Broussonetia papyrifera and other plants, and bonded pieces together, > : to make a thin, paper-like fabric (tapa, bark cloth). Very little tapa > : was made in NZ, since the bark-cloth plants didn't grow well. The Maori > : twined capes mentioned in the earlier post were probably made from NZ > : flax, but it's possible that some were made from bark. If the twining > : techniques were the same in the two areas, > > Yes, they were. > > : that would be a different matter from the question of bark cloth. > > So if the Maori twined capes were not bark cloth, what were they then? Well, they may not have been bark at all, as I explained. But if they were, it is not up to me to make up a handy name for them. It is up to you not to use the term "bark cloth" for things which are not, in the normal usage of the term, bark cloth. > Any more mindless stonewalling and obfuscation? Any more knee-jerk insults? Ross Clark
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<39206AA0.290F@ihug.co.nz>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<391DD883.343C@ihug.co.nz> <11324-391EDB13-46@storefull-174.iap.bryant.webtv.net> <391F1032.36BC@ihug.co.nz> <8fph1t$bsv$1@news.tht.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 106cdd,29f2751f6f36180f X-Google-Attributes: gid106cdd,public X-Google-Thread: 1129f3,2e7fe8a344c352a5 X-Google-Attributes: gid1129f3,public From: benlizross <benlizro@ihug.co.nz> Subject: Re: sailing from Hawaiki (cont.) Date: 2000/05/16 Message-ID: <39206AA0.290F@ihug.co.nz> X-Deja-AN: 623785439 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <391DD883.343C@ihug.co.nz> <11324-391EDB13-46@storefull-174.iap.bryant.webtv.net> <391F1032.36BC@ihug.co.nz> <8fph1t$bsv$1@news.tht.net> Organization: The Internet Group Ltd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: sci.archaeology,bc.general