Article View: sci.archaeology
Article #975Re: Ashby dishonesty and bias (was: botanical facts
From: Yuri Kuchinsky
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 1998 00:00
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 1998 00:00
60 lines
2946 bytes
2946 bytes
Jonathan Stone (jonathan@Kowhai.Stanford.EDU) wrote on 30 Sep 1998 17:56:40 GMT: : In article <6utr22$alv$1@whisper.globalserve.net>, yuku@globalserve.net (Yuri Kuchinsky) writes: : |> Coarse is good. Nothing wrong with coarse if it provides clear answers. : But in this case, "coarse" means it doesnt provide clear anwsers. Show it. : Didn't Peter mention genetic drift? What about it? : |> : Besides they are no good for archwological material since proteins do not : |> : survive for very long. Even the sequence of the blood group genes is not : |> : very useful (but better than simple blood groups) since genomic DNA does : |> : not survive in archeological material. : |> : |> This is irrelevant. Again, you're being dishonest. None of these arguments : |> invalidate this research IN ANY WAY WHATSOEVER. : The results? No. the conclusion that they unambiguously support : Heyerdahl? If one goes to the primary sources, It's not clear they : ever did: the resolution and specificity of the blood-group info is : too coarse. (my that sounds achingly familiar by now). You're babbling. : |> : That is why mitochodrial DNA is : |> : used. : |> : |> Used by who and for what? : By people doing DNA surveys. Used for what? : (well, lets not talk about noncoding or : drifting sequences in protists, OK?) You're babbling. : |> : It survives well in old bones (cf Neanderthal results in Nature : |> : recently) and can be easily measured in modern populations. : |> : |> Too bad that it does not support you, though... : Huh? Too bad that mtDNA studies do not support the mainstream Lapita derivation of Polynesians humbug. Is this clear enough for you now? The King is Naked!!! Yuri. Yuri Kuchinsky -=O=- http://www.globalserve.net/~yuku Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away -=O=- Philip K. Dick
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<6v0f9p$q45$2@whisper.globalserve.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<p-ashby-2909981248330001@mac120.nimr.mrc.ac.uk> <6utr22$alv$1@whisper.globalserve.net> <6utrco$4g0$6@nntp.Stanford.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fcea6,4a599aa9a3239f6e X-Google-Attributes: gidfcea6,public X-Google-Thread: 1129f3,716126af31e790df X-Google-Attributes: gid1129f3,public X-Google-Thread: 10065c,4a599aa9a3239f6e X-Google-Attributes: gid10065c,public X-Google-Thread: 1119a6,4a599aa9a3239f6e X-Google-Attributes: gid1119a6,public From: yuku@globalserve.net (Yuri Kuchinsky) Subject: Re: Ashby dishonesty and bias (was: botanical facts Date: 1998/10/01 Message-ID: <6v0f9p$q45$2@whisper.globalserve.net> X-Deja-AN: 396760138 References: <p-ashby-2909981248330001@mac120.nimr.mrc.ac.uk> <6utr22$alv$1@whisper.globalserve.net> <6utrco$4g0$6@nntp.Stanford.EDU> Followup-To: sci.archaeology,bionet.general,sci.misc,sci.bio.misc X-Complaints-To: abuse@globalserve.net X-Trace: whisper.globalserve.net 907264121 26757 209.90.128.8 (1 Oct 1998 17:48:41 GMT) Organization: balanced NNTP-Posting-Date: 1 Oct 1998 17:48:41 GMT Newsgroups: sci.archaeology,bionet.general,sci.misc,sci.bio.misc