Article View: sci.archaeology
Article #978Re: Ashby dishonesty and bias (was: botanical facts
From: Peter Ashby
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1998 00:00
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1998 00:00
38 lines
2610 bytes
2610 bytes
In article <6utphl$8t4$1@whisper.globalserve.net>, yuku@globalserve.net (Yuri Kuchinsky) wrote: > Peter Ashby (p-ashby@nimr.MAPS.mrc.ac.uk) wrote on 29 Sep 1998 21:06:25 GMT: > : In article <6ur3nm$bkn$2@whisper.globalserve.net>, yuku@globalserve.net > : (Yuri Kuchinsky) wrote: > > > > As I said, I only need one good case for a pre-European introduction of a > > > S American plant to Polynesia to prove my general theory. Since we already > > > have kumara, another plant pretty well would seal the case. And here I > > > have two more plants, papaya and pineapple. So I feel I've done enough. > > > > And as I have pointed out you cannot argue this without (at least) > > explaining why your list is restricted. > > My list is not restricted. Then why doesn't it include: trees (available for canoe building but not used), all species of grass, other sundry flowering plants, liverworts and other primitive photosynthesisers, funghi, bacteria, Non flying insects, any other biota I haven't included. If you want to keep claiming the logic in the first paragraph you either have to present evidence for the inclusion of the above in your human introduced list or present reasons/evidence for excluding them. Calling me a liar (evidence not produced) will not allow you to duck the issue Yuri. I am considering appointing myself your scientific conscience, mainly because you seeem to need one to keep you on the straight and narrow. Peter -- Peter Ashby Eukaryotic Molecular Genetics Nat. Inst. Med. Res. London Reverse the spam and remove to email me.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<p-ashby-0210980920440001@mac120.nimr.mrc.ac.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<360EC1D0.56D9@antnov1.auckland.ac.nz> <6ur3nm$bkn$2@whisper.globalserve.net> <p-ashby-2909982211530001@194.83.182.120> <6utphl$8t4$1@whisper.globalserve.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fcea6,4a599aa9a3239f6e X-Google-Attributes: gidfcea6,public X-Google-Thread: 1129f3,b28de784055c948b X-Google-Attributes: gid1129f3,public X-Google-Thread: 10065c,4a599aa9a3239f6e X-Google-Attributes: gid10065c,public X-Google-Thread: 1119a6,4a599aa9a3239f6e X-Google-Attributes: gid1119a6,public From: p-ashby@nimr.MAPS.mrc.ac.uk (Peter Ashby) Subject: Re: Ashby dishonesty and bias (was: botanical facts Date: 1998/10/02 Message-ID: <p-ashby-0210980920440001@mac120.nimr.mrc.ac.uk> X-Deja-AN: 396976751 References: <360EC1D0.56D9@antnov1.auckland.ac.nz> <6ur3nm$bkn$2@whisper.globalserve.net> <p-ashby-2909982211530001@194.83.182.120> <6utphl$8t4$1@whisper.globalserve.net> X-Complaints-To: news@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk X-Trace: niobium.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk 907316115 22608 194.83.182.120 (2 Oct 1998 08:15:15 GMT) Organization: MRC NNTP-Posting-Date: 2 Oct 1998 08:15:15 GMT Newsgroups: sci.archaeology,bionet.general,sci.misc,sci.bio.misc