Article View: sci.astro.fits
Article #55Re: World Coordinate System proposal
From: Jonathan McDowell
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 14:22
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 14:22
43 lines
3103 bytes
3103 bytes
From article <1dev6dINNnkp@darkstar.UCSC.EDU>, by sla@umbra.UCSC.EDU (Steve Allen): > [... Does the center of pixel (1,1) have the coordinates (1.0,1.0) or (1.5,1.5)???] > If the astronomical community will be variant in this way it will be > essential to clearly document the definition of a pixel. There will > undoubtedly be some astronomical programmers who cling to the more widely > used CG definitions of pixels, and interoperation of their software with > other software will be difficult if these underlying assumptions are not > made explicit in the documentation. > _______________________________________________________________________________ > Steve Allen | That was the equation! | sla@lick.ucsc.edu > UCO/Lick Observatory | Existence!...Survival must | If the UC were opining, > Santa Cruz, CA 95064 | cancel out programming! -- Ruk | it wouldn't tell me. I agree that clear documentation is crucial. Here at SAO we have always used the "CG" definition (center of bottom corner pixel is at "0.5"); IRAF uses mostly "1.0" but not always; and historically FITS has left it up to the user to include a comment card to document how the coordinate system used by CRPIX is mapped on to the data array. We've run into awful trouble in the past by getting confused about this. I'm happy with the "1.0" choice, but we need to make it as explicit as possible. Make the distinction between the number of a pixel (an integer n-tuple) and the coordinates of its center (a real n-tuple) explicit, even if the choice of convention makes them numerically equal. I hope the standard will use lots of small and simple words and some examples (like: "The first data item in the array section is considered to be the pixel whose number is (1,1,1,...1). The number of the next pixel is (1,1,1,...,2). The coordinate value corresponding to the center of the pixel numbered (1,1,...1) is (1.0,1.0,...,1.0)." .-----------------------------------------------------------------------------. | Jonathan McDowell | phone : (617) 495-7176 | | Harvard-Smithsonian Center for | | | Astrophysics | | | 60 Garden St, MS4 | | | Cambridge MA 02138 | inter : mcdowell@urania.harvard.edu | | USA | inter : mcdowell@cfa.harvard.edu | '-----------------------------------------------------------------------------'
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov10.142207.21098@head-cfa.harvard.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pmafire!news.dell.com!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!ukma!hsdndev!cfa203!mcdowellReferences:
<1dev6dINNnkp@darkstar.UCSC.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pmafire!news.dell.com!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!ukma!hsdndev!cfa203!mcdowell From: mcdowell@head-cfa.harvard.edu (Jonathan McDowell) Newsgroups: sci.astro.fits Subject: Re: World Coordinate System proposal Message-ID: <1992Nov10.142207.21098@head-cfa.harvard.edu> Date: 10 Nov 92 14:22:07 GMT References: <1dev6dINNnkp@darkstar.UCSC.EDU> Organization: Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Cambridge, MA, USA Lines: 43