🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.astro.fits
Article #63

Re: VAX R*8 to FITS/IEEE R*8 conversion prob

#63
From: Chris Flatters
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 18:09
24 lines
1889 bytes
In article AA05949@tetra.gsfc.nasa.gov, pence@tetra.gsfc.nasa.gov (William Pence) writes:
>As an aside, I'm sure you are aware that the VAX has 2 different R*8 data 
>representations.  The default D_floating representation which you are probably using
>reserves 8 bits for the exponent and 55 bits for the mantissa.  The G_floating
>representation on the otherhand is similar to the IEEE R*8  representation: both
>have 11 bits for the exponent and 52 bits for the mantissa.  The G_floating
>and IEEE values are still not identical though because the VAX interprets the
>exponent and mantissa numbers as normalized, ("hidden bit normalization") which
>effectively gives you another bit of precision compared to the IEEE value.
>If you were to use G_floating on the VAX, you probably would not notice the
>loss of precision in converting the data back and forth from FITS.

IEEE values are also normalized as long as they are greater than or equal
to 2 ** E_min, where E_min is the minimum exponent.  An IEEE-754 double
has a precision of 53 base-2 digits (identical to VAX G-floating) as long
as E >= E_min (E_min = -1022).  VAX G-floating and IEEE-754 doubles probably
differ in the bias of the exponent (this is the difference between normalized
IEEE singles and VAX F-floats).

Incidentally, if you think about it you will realize that the exponent can
not be normalized.

	Chris Flatters
	cflatter@nrao.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1992Dec17.180912.16963@nrao.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!hri.com!spool.mu.edu!sdd.hp.com!caen!uvaarpa!cv3.cv.nrao.edu!laphroaig!cflatter
References: <9212171630.AA05949@tetra.gsfc.nasa.gov>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!hri.com!spool.mu.edu!sdd.hp.com!caen!uvaarpa!cv3.cv.nrao.edu!laphroaig!cflatter
From: cflatter@nrao.edu (Chris Flatters)
Newsgroups: sci.astro.fits
Subject: Re: VAX R*8 to FITS/IEEE R*8 conversion prob
Message-ID: <1992Dec17.180912.16963@nrao.edu>
Date: 17 Dec 92 18:09:12 GMT
References: <9212171630.AA05949@tetra.gsfc.nasa.gov>
Sender: news@nrao.edu
Reply-To: cflatter@nrao.edu
Organization: NRAO
Lines: 24