Article View: sci.astro.fits
Article #9BSCALE/BZERO
From: Peter Teuben
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 15:27
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 15:27
28 lines
1695 bytes
1695 bytes
The NOST fits panel report states that for BITPIX < 0 (i.e. when the data is stored in IEEE floating point format) the usage of BSCALE and BZERO not recommended. We never (wanted to) forbid or explicitly state that it should or should not be applied in section 6.3 (though section 5.2.2.5 does state this). The FITS users guide (also published by NOST) does explicitly states that BSCALE and BZERO be applied in the BITPIX<0 case, with the danger of producing overflows/underflows of course (hence the reason that BSCALE and BZERO should not be present). I've indeed noted that the AIPS and MIRIAD readers 'correctly' apply BSCALE and BZERO in the floating point cases, but the problem arose when we imported a FITS file generated by IDL. The idl procedure 'WRITEFITS' seems to write images with BSCALE not 1.0, which has caused some readers to read in the wrong datavalues. Perhaps Wayne Landsman can comment on this. Has anybody seen fits readers which skip BSCALE and BZERO if BITPIX < 0? Peter -- Peter J. Teuben | INTERNET : teuben@astro.umd.edu Astronomy Department | FAX: (301) 314-9067 University of Maryland | MA-BELL : (301) 405-1540 (office) College Park, MD 20742 | (301) 405-1502 (secr.)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<TEUBEN.92Jul28112713@lynx.astro.umd.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!mips!darwin.sura.net!haven.umd.edu!umd5!umd5.umd.edu!teubenShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!mips!darwin.sura.net!haven.umd.edu!umd5!umd5.umd.edu!teuben From: teuben@lynx.astro.umd.edu (Peter Teuben) Newsgroups: sci.astro.fits Subject: BSCALE/BZERO Message-ID: <TEUBEN.92Jul28112713@lynx.astro.umd.edu> Date: 28 Jul 92 15:27:13 GMT Sender: news@umd5.umd.edu Distribution: sci Organization: University of Maryland, Astronomy Department Lines: 28