Thread View: sci.astro.fits
2 messages
2 total messages
Started by William Thompson, code 682.1, x2...
Mon, 09 Nov 1992 22:29
World Coordinates
Author: William Thompson, code 682.1, x2...
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 1992 22:29
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 1992 22:29
16 lines
1286 bytes
1286 bytes
After having read the world coordinates proposal, I am still unclear as to how the developers would describe this very simple problem: Given: A slit spectrograph with a single pointing position. The dimensions of the data are two: one spatial coordinate and one spectral coordinate. However, to describe the pointing, two spatial coordinates are needed, as well as the orientation of the slit, and the spectral dispersion and central wavelength. In other words, the data has only two dimensions, but it takes three dimensions to properly describe it. Secondly, it appears that this convention is only relevant to skymapped data--which I admit applies to most astronomical data. However, it's hard to see the relevance to solar images, for example. Bill Thompson
Re: World Coordinates
Author: Bob Hanisch, ST ScI
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 14:47
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 14:47
39 lines
2851 bytes
2851 bytes
In article 9NOV199218295135@stars.gsfc.nasa.gov, thompson@stars.gsfc.nasa.gov (William Thompson, code 682.1, x2040) writes: >After having read the world coordinates proposal, I am still unclear as to how >the developers would describe this very simple problem: > > Given: A slit spectrograph with a single pointing position. The > dimensions of the data are two: one spatial coordinate and one > spectral coordinate. However, to describe the pointing, two > spatial coordinates are needed, as well as the orientation of > the slit, and the spectral dispersion and central wavelength. > In other words, the data has only two dimensions, but it takes > three dimensions to properly describe it. > >Secondly, it appears that this convention is only relevant to skymapped >data--which I admit applies to most astronomical data. However, it's hard to >see the relevance to solar images, for example. > >Bill Thompson The title of the draft probably should have been more restrictive, i.e., "Representation of Sky Projection Coordinate Systems Within FITS" or something like that. At the WCS meeting in Charlottesville in 1988 we decided to tackle this problem first, and that was again agreed upon at the Boston meeting last week. The example cited above is actually not so simple, since things are rarely this straightforward. The dispersion axis is usually not perpendicular to the spatial axis, and indeed is usually curved. The dispersion relation itself is frequently nonlinear. The simple case described above CAN be handled within FITS, and is supported within a number of systems (e.g., radio data cubes are really the same thing -- the dispersion axis is usually the third axis, but this need not be the case). At the Boston meeting there were volunteers to work on adding solar and planetary coordinate systems to the draft. If you are interested in participating in this effort, please contact Winnifred Williams at NOAO (wwilliams@noao.edu), who agreed to coordinate this work. --- Robert J. Hanisch Tel. (410)338-4910 Fax. (410)338-5090 Space Telescope Science Institute NSI: hanisch@stsci.edu [130.167.1.2] 3700 San Martin Drive DECNet: STSCIC::HANISCH [6549::] Baltimore, MD 21218 USA Bitnet: hanisch@stsci
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads