re: no. of stars in M87

Article View: sci.astro.hubble

Article #4

From: I. Neill Reid
Date: Sat, 05 Sep 1992 17:15

18 lines
1222 bytes

>From: Rune.Johansen@nta.no (Rune Henning Johansen FBA)

>In an article translated from English to Norwegian it was mentioned
>that Hubble took some pictures of the galaxy M87. According to the
>article this galaxy consists of two "billoner" stars. Since a
>Norwegian "billion" is thousand times greater than an English
>"billion" I wonder if there might be a translation error. So my
>question is simply: How many stars is there in M87?

> - Rune

 10**9 is an American billion - I certainly always thought of a
billion as a million million until I started working in astronomy.
But about 10**12 sounds right since big ellipticals can have masses of
more than 10**12 solar masses, and since your average star (that's 
averaging everything) is about 0.5 M(sun) there's the billion.

 Neill Reid - inr@accles.caltech.edu

Technical Details

Message-ID: <Bu47xB.An2@rice.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!rice!bounce-back

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: sci.astro.hubble
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!rice!bounce-back
From: inr@eccles.caltech.edu (I. Neill Reid)
Subject: re: no. of stars in M87
Message-ID: <Bu47xB.An2@rice.edu>
Originator: uk1@spacsun.rice.edu
Lines: 21
Sender: news@rice.edu (News)
Organization: California Institute of Technology
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 1992 17:15:11 GMT
Approved: uk1@spacsun.rice.edu