Article View: sci.astro
Article #3342Re: Super Polaris vs. Classic C8?
From: Frank Calloway
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1993 14:48
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1993 14:48
26 lines
1678 bytes
1678 bytes
> The Super Polaris is a good mount. I am not very impressed with Celestron > fork mounts, after experiancing a C-8, C-11 & C-14 that are fork mounted. > I find the german equatorial mounts that Celestron are now producing a lot > more stable. > One C-8 was so bad (and it was BRAND NEW) that it was unusable (visually) > over 200X magnification, and since I am mostly interested in > AstroPhotography, this certainly couldn't work - I got rid of it. > So, German Equatorials are the way to go. > Steven Williams - Astronomer. I think Steven's comments are an oversimplification. The Ultima 8 from Celestron is very stable; none of the gross wandering at 200X that Steven has seen in other models. Its fork arms and tripod are massive in comparison to the other C8s. Thus, it depends on which C8 you use. As a counterpoint, I've used the Super Polaris mount on a couple of scopes and thought it was a bit crude compared to the fork mounts. For me, the setting circles were marginally useful and the slow motion controls and clutches felt coarse and cheap. On the other hand, I'd expect the new Celestron German equatorial mounts made by Losmandy to be quite good. Frank Calloway
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1550034@hplvec.LVLD.HP.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!hpscit.sc.hp.com!hplextra!hpfcso!hplvec!callowayReferences:
<1993Jan7.111200.701@lmpsbbs.comm.mot.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: calloway@hplvec.LVLD.HP.COM (Frank Calloway) Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1993 14:48:44 GMT Subject: Re: Super Polaris vs. Classic C8? Message-ID: <1550034@hplvec.LVLD.HP.COM> Organization: Hewlett-Packard Co., Loveland, CO Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!hpscit.sc.hp.com!hplextra!hpfcso!hplvec!calloway Newsgroups: sci.astro References: <1993Jan7.111200.701@lmpsbbs.comm.mot.com> Lines: 26