Article View: sci.astro
Article #3373Re: research grade vs. commercial grade
From: Christopher Gunn
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 17:39
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 17:39
20 lines
1540 bytes
1540 bytes
In article <93021.030722LABBEY@GITVM1.BITNET>, <LABBEY@GITVM1.BITNET> writes: > "Research grade" means that his telescope is just like any other. There are > no grades in telescope quality. No such system exists. Quality varies > from specimen to specimen. I've got packed away somewhere an older (2,3 yrs.) Meade catalog that I remember only hazily, but weren't the 826 and some xxyy scopes in the 10-12" range (where xx=size) old-style "Cave"-style Newtonians with rotating tubes, heavy/heavier mounts, etc? I seem to remember that their weights and costs were a lot more than their Sonotube "Deep Space" Newtonians. Wasn't "research grade" Meade advertising blurb-ese for "not made of cardboard?" (Not being snobby here--I've got a cardboard Coulter.) I have no information about their optics, but I think they had longer and more forgiving focal lengths.... Christopher Gunn Molecular Graphics and Modeling Lab SPAN--KUPHSX::GUNN Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Malott Hall 913-864-4428 or -4495 University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan21.113939.46594@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!srvr1.engin.umich.edu!kuhub.cc.ukans.edu!1k1mgmReferences:
<1993Jan20.211839.27984@zip.eecs.umich.edu> <93021.030722LABBEY@GITVM1.BITNET>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!srvr1.engin.umich.edu!kuhub.cc.ukans.edu!1k1mgm From: 1k1mgm@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu (Christopher Gunn) Newsgroups: sci.astro Subject: Re: research grade vs. commercial grade Message-ID: <1993Jan21.113939.46594@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> Date: 21 Jan 93 11:39:39 CST References: <1993Jan20.211839.27984@zip.eecs.umich.edu> <93021.030722LABBEY@GITVM1.BITNET> Distribution: na Organization: University of Kansas Academic Computing Services Lines: 20