Re: That Great Pulsar Timing Flame War

Article View: sci.astro

Article #3586

#3586

From: MARC PAUL JOREF VAN LOO
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1993 08:51

11 lines
974 bytes

  There exists no decent derivation of the
  gravitational radiation of a binary pulsar.
  Yu's objection to this derivation is correct.
  But I found out recently that it is not new:
  Read the 16th lecture of Buchwald's book
  17 simple lectures on GR. (1982).

  If you still maintain after reading this book
  that gravitational radiation (or GR in general)
  is a clear and undebatable subject, you must
  be very hard-headed.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1993Jan7.085151.13461@nuscc.nus.sg>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!newsserver.jvnc.net!newsserver.technet.sg!nuscc!nusunix2.nus.sg!scip2124

References: <1993Jan5.224539.11613@s1.gov>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: sci.astro,sci.physics
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!newsserver.jvnc.net!newsserver.technet.sg!nuscc!nusunix2.nus.sg!scip2124
From: scip2124@nusunix1.nus.sg (MARC PAUL JOREF VAN LOO)
Subject: Re: That Great Pulsar Timing Flame War
Message-ID: <1993Jan7.085151.13461@nuscc.nus.sg>
Sender: usenet@nuscc.nus.sg
Organization: National University of Singapore
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
References: <1993Jan5.224539.11613@s1.gov>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 08:51:51 GMT
Lines: 12

Reply to Parent Message