Article View: sci.astro
Article #3819obstructed view?
From: Paul Butler
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 20:56
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 20:56
23 lines
1186 bytes
1186 bytes
It seems that people prefer refractors for viewing the planets, but are
willing to use a telescope with an obstruction (e.g. Newtonians) in
order to gain aperture when viewing far away objects.
1. Why is this?
2. What do people prefer to look through when viewing large far away
objects (nebulae)? Why?
3. Could a reflecting telescope without an obstruction be as good as a
refractor?
4. Is it practical (possible?) to build a parabolic mirror
that is not centered around the trough of the parabola (so that the
primary's focal point is not directly over the mirror)?
5. How is this idea related to the idea of using an aperture stop?
I don't know much about optics or telescopes, so keep it simple.
Thanks,
Paul Butler
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1ivb92INN974@falcon.natinst.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!cs.utexas.edu!natinst.com!natinst.com!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!cs.utexas.edu!natinst.com!natinst.com!not-for-mail From: butler@natinst.com (Paul Butler) Newsgroups: sci.astro Subject: obstructed view? Date: 12 Jan 1993 14:56:02 -0600 Organization: National Instruments, Austin, TX Lines: 23 Message-ID: <1ivb92INN974@falcon.natinst.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: falcon.natinst.com Keywords: telescope refractor reflector