Article View: sci.astro
Article #3886Re: Now I Understand
From: catchme
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:51
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:51
43 lines
3534 bytes
3534 bytes
Onideus Mad Hatter wrote: > On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 11:46:14 -0800, catchme <someone@somewhere.net> > wrote: > >> Rev Turd Fredericks wrote: >>> Shenan Stanley wrote: >>>> >>> After your assertion that personal experience is "inaccurate (at best)", >>> your whole post has become a meaningless diatribe. >> actually he has eloquently described why every major o/s has the same >> fundamental flaw: feature creep and bug-fix/ patches.....in other words, >> bloatware. >> I can only hope that his follow- up post will be an announcement of a >> new o/s he and/or some friends built from the ground up. > > No, actually he missed a rather large and very important issue and the > fundamental reason as to *WHY* so many people have trouble with their > software. > > Can't guess what it is? > > Let me ask you this...what is your SOFTware running on? > > Yeah, that's right, HARDware. If you're running your software with > shit grade, factory seconds, refurbished garbage that you bought off > eBay or pulled out of some fuckin Dell shit box...yeah...yer gonna be > having all ~sorts~ of trouble gettin that bitch stay up for longer > than five minutes without some kind of system crash. I've found that > a good 9 out of 10 times whatever "problem" a user is having is either > because they're a fuckin idiot with a short between the keyboard and > chair, or they're running their system on shit grade hardware. > hardware and user intelligence are factors to consider, yes, but one has gotta admit that if you were the best god-damn software designer there was and knew whatever your favorite o/s is, inside and out, and had a rig so screaming fast that it would take the mid- market 4 years to catch up, would you still be happy with your o/s, even after you tinkered around with it beyond what the manufacture expressly authorised? Factor in high computer aptitude and training, and solid-state hardware, and you're still left with over-written software- with the exception, perhaps of a few notable linux distros such as Damn Small Linux.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<IG84l.7348$sC4.1098@newsfe04.iad>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post02.iad.highwinds-media.com!newsfe04.iad.POSTED!7564ea0f!not-for-mailReferences:
<Xns9B7AB9C822192fdgdfjhsrtg@207.115.17.102> <ONpv1ZwYJHA.1532@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl> <%Jj3l.360623$1p1.137259@en-nntp-08.dc1.easynews.com> <T2x3l.353$fc3.338@newsfe02.iad> <k2u1l41meio36ug6272klb77sl2q4a0b4a@4ax.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: f74ae,46a91ee0de85fa82 X-Google-Thread: 10bb54,46a91ee0de85fa82 X-Google-Thread: 1050a2,46a91ee0de85fa82 X-Google-Thread: faa3c,46a91ee0de85fa82 X-Google-Attributes: gidf74ae,gid10bb54,gid1050a2,gidfaa3c,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post02.iad.highwinds-media.com!newsfe04.iad.POSTED!7564ea0f!not-for-mail From: catchme <someone@somewhere.net> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: sci.astro,alt.2600,microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support,24hoursupport.helpdesk Subject: Re: Now I Understand References: <Xns9B7AB9C822192fdgdfjhsrtg@207.115.17.102> <ONpv1ZwYJHA.1532@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl> <%Jj3l.360623$1p1.137259@en-nntp-08.dc1.easynews.com> <T2x3l.353$fc3.338@newsfe02.iad> <k2u1l41meio36ug6272klb77sl2q4a0b4a@4ax.com> In-Reply-To: <k2u1l41meio36ug6272klb77sl2q4a0b4a@4ax.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 43 Message-ID: <IG84l.7348$sC4.1098@newsfe04.iad> NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.85.95.59 X-Complaints-To: internet.abuse@sjrb.ca X-Trace: newsfe04.iad 1230051112 24.85.95.59 (Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:51:52 UTC) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:51:52 UTC Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 08:51:36 -0800