Article View: sci.astro
Article #3938Re: Now I Understand
From: jmfbahciv
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 13:50
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 13:50
48 lines
3583 bytes
3583 bytes
Bluuuue Rajah wrote: > "philo" <philo@privacy.net> wrote in > news:WbmdnV8eb4a2HdDUnZ2dnUVZ_gKdnZ2d@ntd.net: > >> "Bluuuue Rajah" <Bluuuuue@Rajah.> wrote in message >> news:Xns9B7AB9C822192fdgdfjhsrtg@207.115.17.102... >>> Everybody rightly criticizes Micro$tiff for selling a crappy OS, and >>> Linux is obviuosly better, if you have the time and the expertise to >>> use in it, but until this week I didn't understand exaclty why >>> Windows is such a POS. >>> >>> When I had to uninstall the Google toolbar because Google installed >>> an update tht I didn't ask for, which overrode IE5's ctrl-f command, >>> the reason beame clear. Windows' install/uninstall method causes >>> bugs to accumulate, if programs are not ununstalled in precise the >>> reverse order of which they were installed. >>> >>> The problem is that terrible method of saving old copies of system >>> files, like .ini files, as backups, to be restored when software is >>> uninstalled. So the more apps you uninstall, out of order, the >>> buggier your system becomes, until you finally have to reinstall the >>> OS. >>> >>> Linux apparently doesn't have anything resembling this problem, which >>> makes me wonder, how did the Linux designers (Torvald?) handle this >>> problem, and can we learn anything from their solution to help >>> minimize the problem with Windows? >>> >>> Your thoughts? >> >> I've been using Linux almost as long as I've been using Windows. >> >> Linux is not immune from it's own problems... >> and unless one is very familiar with Linux...the problems can >> sometimes be harder to sort out. >> >> That said, with a little bit of common sense, Windows should not >> require a re-install. >> I run mainly Win2k and XP and they have both been running 99% + >> trouble free for *many* years. > > You're living in a fantasy world. Everybody knows that Windows slowly > accumulates bugs. They've known almost from day one, when people > started griping about what a POS it was. Every OS accumulates bugs. That's reality, son. /BHA
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<gilh5b2f50@news1.newsguy.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx01.iad.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!69.16.185.16.MISMATCH!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!spln!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!news1References:
<Xns9B7AB9C822192fdgdfjhsrtg@207.115.17.102> <WbmdnV8eb4a2HdDUnZ2dnUVZ_gKdnZ2d@ntd.net> <Xns9B7B39348C4E1fdgdfjhsrtg@207.115.33.102>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: f74ae,46a91ee0de85fa82 X-Google-Thread: 10bb54,46a91ee0de85fa82 X-Google-Thread: 10b271,46a91ee0de85fa82 X-Google-Thread: 1050a2,46a91ee0de85fa82 X-Google-Thread: faa3c,46a91ee0de85fa82 X-Google-Attributes: gidf74ae,gid10bb54,gid10b271,gid1050a2,gidfaa3c,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx01.iad.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!69.16.185.16.MISMATCH!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!spln!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!news1 From: jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv@aol> Newsgroups: sci.astro,alt.2600,sci.physics,microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support,24hoursupport.helpdesk Subject: Re: Now I Understand Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 08:50:20 -0500 Organization: NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $19.95 Lines: 48 Message-ID: <gilh5b2f50@news1.newsguy.com> References: <Xns9B7AB9C822192fdgdfjhsrtg@207.115.17.102> <WbmdnV8eb4a2HdDUnZ2dnUVZ_gKdnZ2d@ntd.net> <Xns9B7B39348C4E1fdgdfjhsrtg@207.115.33.102> NNTP-Posting-Host: p14d1bfbfff0000002fc46f361770e711fdc051d236402064.newsdawg.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.8.1.13) Gecko/20080313 SeaMonkey/1.1.9 In-Reply-To: <Xns9B7B39348C4E1fdgdfjhsrtg@207.115.33.102>