🚀 go-pugleaf

Bluuuue Rajah <Bluuuuue@Rajah.> wrote in message
news:Xns9B7AB9C822192fdgdfjhsrtg@207.115.17.102:

> Ewewybody wightwy cwiticizes Micow$tiff fow sewwing a cwappy OS, and
> Winux is obwiuoswy bettew, if you hawe th-th-the time and th-th-the
> expewtise t-t-t-to use in it, but untiw th-th-this week I didn't
> undewstand exacwty why Windows is such a POS.

> When I had t-t-t-to uninstaww th-th-the Googwe toowbaw because Googwe
> instawwed an update th-th-tht I didn't ask fow, which owewowde IE5's
> ctww-f command, th-th-the weason beame cweaw.  Windows'
> instaww/uninstaww meth-th-thod causes bugs t-t-t-to accumuwate, if
> powgwams awe not ununstawwed in pwecise th-th-the wewewse owdew of
> which th-th-they wewe instawwed.

> De powbwem is th-th-that tewwibwe meth-th-thod of sawing owd copies of
> system fiwes, wike .ini fiwes, as backups, t-t-t-to be westowed when
> softwawe is uninstawwed.  So th-th-the mowe apps you uninstaww, out of
> owdew, th-th-the buggiew youw system becomes, untiw you finawwy hawe
> t-t-t-to weinstaww th-th-the OS.

> Winux appawentwy doesn't hawe anyth-th-thing wesembwing th-th-this
> powbwem, which makes me wondew, how did th-th-the Winux designews
> (Towwawd?) handwe th-th-this powbwem, and can we weawn anyth-th-thing
> fowm th-th-theiw sowution t-t-t-to hewp minimize th-th-the powbwem wif
> Windows?

> Youw th-th-thoughts?