🚀 go-pugleaf

So the brain and the soul already are one.

Perhaps what we have at live centre of gravity of brain is stable
singularity, in which there would of course be absolutely no sense at all,
and least of all materially.

Is there a theorem already that any CoG would of neccessity have to be a
void?

Basicly it's Rutherford revisited, since all of objective nature is of
course materially void, not even mentioning its conceptual copies.

The point is rather that nothing seems to be able to actually penetrate the
weak material force field. If you take 2D light particles, that are assumed
not to have any weak material forces, why do they have intercourse with
particles that do? Since it takes two to tango. Theoretically they would
have to be flying straight through them, just as gravity is completely
impartial to charge and vice versa. So either light quanta do have weak
material forces, or there must be a fifth force of universal identity, which
would have to be trans-dimensional and on which it would be possible to
project a centre, dead or alive.

While the existence of centres of 2D quanta may be succesfully established,
no force field, whether in 2D, 3D, or in space, could actually have material
properties, but they do all have centres, whether they be gravity, charge,
weak, strong or other fields, and in case of particular combinations of
these their centres coincide. Which consequently leads us to at least three
more questions as to the centres in, out or of brain, and if these would be
particularly combined. What's so funny about gravity anyway?

Now it would be very interesting to know whether there could be particles,
in whatever dimensional configuration, that are REALLY impartial to any
other type of particles and that would therefore be theoretically impossible
to detect, moreover, of which not just the existence, but even the
assumption would be arbitrary. And if such a particle could, in fact, be
located at live centre of gravity of brain, from which the reason of life
itself would spray as a universal contradiction to its own meaning.

This is not good.